i am upgrading my ram, should I get 2gig or 4 gigs....I have read that anything over 2gig with xp is a waste as there becomes some problems with xp and 3 gigs and over. where im going to be using dual channels, i figure 2 is better...
-
Depends on your needs, and habits. If you multitask alot and use bunch of memory intensive programs, like photoshop, then you will need that 4 gb on XP. Otherwise, 2 gb is more than enough ram on windows XP.
However, a benefit of 4 gb is the future prove aspects of it, if you ever decided to use some memory intensive program, or tasks, or move to Vista, you will see some benefit. So, If 4 gb is cheaper or around the cost of 2 gb around where you live, I would recommend picking up 4 Gb. -
To the OP: unless you plan on upgrading to a 64 bit operating system, stick with 2GB. -
I'm still on 512MB of RAM with Windows XP. Everything is still fast, mostly because I replaced Norton with NOD32. Unfortunately, I can't find another 512MB stick DDR-333 RAM anywhere (max capacity of 1GB over two 512MB sticks).
-
-
As an opinion I think 2GB should be just fine for XP.
-
-
Yeah. 2 GB is the best bet for XP. 1 is standard, but 2 is best.
-
-
For a x86 system, I'd say 2 GB of RAM is the sweetspot; XP and Vista.
-
2GB is great for XP. I wouldn't think you need more.
-
Memory sticks are so cheap now that maxing out your system wouldn't hurt.
-
-
It might set you back $13. As far as cables go can't you just move aside or carefully disconnect then reconnect?
ram and xp
Discussion in 'Windows OS and Software' started by kojack, Feb 12, 2008.