The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Acer Aspire Timeline 5810TG or Acer Aspire 5738Z?

    Discussion in 'Acer' started by lunarsea, Oct 15, 2010.

  1. lunarsea

    lunarsea Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Hi,

    I'm looking to purchase a laptop and I've narrowed it down to the Acer Aspire Timeline 5810TG and the Acer Aspire 5738Z.

    The Timeline has a bigger hard drive, longer battery life, and better specs overall, however, one thing I am worried about is the processor speed.

    The 5738Z has a Intel® Pentium® Dual Core (T4300, 2.1Ghz 800Mhz 1MB L2 cache ) whilst the Timeline has a Intel® ULV Core 2 Duo (ULV SU9400, 3 MB L2 cache, 1.4GHz, 800MHz FSB).

    I know the Core2Duo are the more modern version and are supposed to run faster, but is the slow CPU speed of 1.4GHz going to make the computer much slower than the Dual Core 2.1GHZ?

    Sites like cpubenchmark.net seem to think so, as they have ranked the 1.4GHZ really poorly, even though it is Core 2 Duo and has an impressive 3mb cache.

    Does anybody know, in reality, which CPU will run the computer faster and if there will be much of a difference?

    I want to use the computer mainly for internet work-related activities (multi-window firefox, word, outlook express/windows live mail, dreamweaver, all running at once etc) as well as listening to music/watching movies, and I want to know which of the two will be better suited.

    Thanks very much for your help. :)
     
  2. downloads

    downloads No, Dee Dee, no! Super Moderator

    Reputations:
    7,729
    Messages:
    8,722
    Likes Received:
    2,231
    Trophy Points:
    331
    There's a benchmark list of all mobile CPUs on notebookcheck that has both of these. It looks like you are right and T4300 is significantly faster in every benchmark compared to SU9400.
    You haven't mentioned that you need very long battery life in your requirements- so T4300 seems to be a better choice for general usage and more future-proof too.
     
  3. Phil

    Phil Retired

    Reputations:
    4,415
    Messages:
    17,036
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    455
    Cross posting is against the forum rules. Please respect them.