Hello!
1810TZ-413G32N has pentium dual core SU4100 @ 1.3GHz
1810T-734G32N has core 2 duo SU7300 @ 1.3GHZ
I read somewhere on this forum (sry, forgot where) that Passmark bench gives SU4100 840 points and SU7300 got 890 -- which is (by my opinion) minor difference. Both feature VT and support x64
But price difference is almost 100 euros -- 450 vs. 550, all other stuff the same.
I gladly pay more, but I rly don't see any benefit.
Please, enlighten me![]()
-
Are you sure about VT support in SU4100?
http://ark.intel.com/Compare.aspx?ids=43568,42791,36697 -
No VT support in SU4100!
But no, 100EUR extra is too much for 7300 IMO -
Which one consumes less power ?
-
They both have a max TDP of 10W.
-
-
I just bought both: I wanted the T!
1810T SU7300 @ $599
1810TZ - SU4100 @ $549
T came with SU7300, 3 Mb Cach, 4 Gb Mem, supports VIT
TZ has SU4100, 2 Mb Cach, 3 Gb Men, does not support VIT
I wanted the T and kept missing it and didn't think I would get it so I bought the TZ.
Then I finally got the chance to get it and gave the TZ to my daughter.
Rich
Aspire 1810 - SU4100 vs SU7300 - worth 100 EUR difference?
Discussion in 'Acer' started by sponka, Dec 22, 2009.