I am considering purchasing an Acer 2012WLMI and I have laid out the pro's and con's as far as I could tell from never having seen one. If anyone has any personal experiences they would like to chip in that would be great, especially if I have got something wrong in my research. Thanks!!!!
Acer Aspire AS2012WLMi (ChiefValue)
Pentium M 1.5GHz
XP Pro
512 x2 DDR 300
60GB 4200
DVD+/-RW
WLAN b/g
15.4" WXGA TFT (1280 x 800)
64MB Radeon 9700
8 Cell Lithium Ion Battery
up to 300 minutes
6.6 lbs
14.2 W x 10.7" D x 1.1" - 1.3"
1 Year
3 USB, 1 FW, S-video TV, IR
4-in-1 card reader
$1,439
Advantages: One of the best overall technical specs in its range. Nice video card. Good rated battery life and a DVD burner (nice but not needed) with other nice touches such as a IR port and a 4-in-1 card reader
Disadvantages: Has not been examined in person and purchased through ChiefVaule with 30 exchange or 15% return. Both RAM slots filled and relatively slow processor, keyboard layout buries home and end under a function key (but keeps menu button down low). Keyboard placement is also reputed to be placed in a strange location and to be 'recessed' though I am not sure what this means.
-
-
Check out the review that I did on my 2012WLMi, it's been posted on the main page of the site (http://www.notebookreview.com/)
If you have any questions that you would like answered, you can post them in the discussion thread for the review and I will do my best to answer.
- Odie -
Well I have mine coming tomorrow. I will be using it for multimedia (alot of audio encoding, real time processing, using Nuendo 2 and a few real time effects) so I'll be able to give a more performance based review some time tomorrow evening after I've had a chance to work with it. I know it's not quite the powerhouse that the original laptop I ordered was (1501LCe w/Athlon64 3000+) but the overall feature set sounds amazing, and I've heard very good things about the Centrino/Pentium-M processor despite it's ludicrously low clock speeds.
www.soundclick.com/chimpspanner
http://chimpspanner.heavenlymediaservices.com -
Thanks for the replies. I will go check out your review Odie and look forward to your chimp. It is going to take a bit of a leap of faith to pluck $1500 down on a machine that it looks to be impossible to return in the US.
-
Because I'm getting this laptop as "compensation" for a persistently faulty 1501LCe, and I had to decide on which model I wanted to replace it with last night, so I could accept the offer this morning, I did alot of frantic reading about the Pentium M processor (which, lets face it, is the only part of this laptop that you really wanna know about in as much as how suitable it will be for you).
My main problem was that I had nothing to really gauge the P-M against, and it was very difficult to find some concrete figures on how exactly this thing performs. But I'm getting a fairly clear picture of the kind of results I can expect...
I'm currently using a desktop AthlonXP 2000+ as a temporary measure until my laptop comes. I'm using it for audio recording, MIDI sequencing (which is intense multimedia work), and is what I'll be using the laptop for. The AthlonXP2000+ runs at 1.67Ghz, with 256KB L2 Cacheand a 266Mhz FSB. So far, it handles pretty much everything I want it to, although admittedly I don't have much CPU overhead. So once things get busy...there's not much power to play with. But it's still more than acceptable.
Compare that to the P-M 1.5Ghz which has 64KB of on-die Cache (someone correct me if I'm wrong) and 1MB of level 2 Cache, combined with a 400Mhz FSB. Although the "on paper" clock speeds are comparable 1.5/1.67, the fact that the P-M has four times the L2 Cache and a FSB almost twice the speed of the machine I'm running now, *should* put it streets ahead. And this doesn't take into account all the other numerous features that the P-M utilises to get the most out of what precious few Megahertz it hasSo I'm guessing as a rough estimate...the P-M 1.5 should...and I say *should* perform around a 2.4Ghz and upwards. I know some people say that a 1.5x multiplier is a high estimate, but look at the AthlonXP 2000+. According to the rating on that chip, with a 266Mhz FSB and 256KB of L2 Cache, it would seem to perform at a factor of 1.3 times it's clockspeed. I think that's right, I'm a little tired so someone stop me if I'm spouting numbers.
Aaanyway, this is not to sway your decision. If anything it's to re-assure ME that the laptop I've gone for will cut itbut I really think it will. Once I get using it, I will let you know how it performs as soon as I know. But the crux of it would seem to be, don't let the absurdly low clock speed bug you too much. AMD have proved that clock speed isn't everything. I believe the same is true here.
But we'll see!
**Edit: and hey, I didn't even touch on the fact that it's widescreen , has graphics far far superior to "more powerful" P4/P4M powered Acers, most of which have intergrated graphics chips and share system memory for video. DVDRW, 4-in-1 card reader, larger than usual HDD....obviously you know all this already, but I think the features alone outweigh any cutbacks on raw power
Ahh can't wait...
www.soundclick.com/chimpspanner
http://chimpspanner.heavenlymediaservices.com -
I just saw that www.newegg.com has the Acer 2012WLmi for $1399 (shipping INCLUDED). They also have the 15% restoking fee but are a far more respectable vendor.
I am also considering the 2012WLmi and newegg.com is my ONLY choice for that laptop.
e-Machines laptops rock -
hey brokejumper and zlatanov, im currently in the middle of deciding between the 2012 and the toshiba M30, have you guys ordered/received your notebooks yet? would like to know your opinions...
thanks -
<blockquote id='quote'> quote:<hr height='1' noshade id='quote'>Originally posted by kamiazim
Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015 -
<blockquote id='quote'> quote:<hr height='1' noshade id='quote'>Originally posted by kamiazim
Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2015 -
Hi. I checked the review of the 2012 and I compared it to my 1501LMi.
The P-M 1,5Ghz takes some 2:21 mins:secs with superPI, where the Athlon64 3000+ scores 1:55. So, roughly you need an P-M 1,7Ghz to match the Athlon64 3000+ which runs at 1,8 Ghz. SuperPI wise ofcourse. My desktop AMD 2400+ (fsb = 266) takes 2:25 mins to complete the 2 million iterations, just a bit slower than P-M@1,5.
Now, the radeon 9700 of the 2012 scores around 22000 in aquamark, so does the 9600 of my laptop and I guess this is due to the faster processor. The 9600pro of my desktop scores around 25000.
comparison of 4 laptops with various P-M/P4/AMD64 processors: http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/chart_comparison.asp?aid=117001&prodid=20379&prodid=22227&prodid=21801&prodid=21762
==============================
1.
Gigabyte 7DXR+, Athlon XP 2400+, AMD cooler
512DDR Ram, 200GB + 80GB WD JB + 40GB WD BB + 40GB IBM DeathStar-ready to die (click click clicks).
DVD , CDRW, 350Watt HEC AMD approved PSU, 1000VA Mustek UPS
212G Allied Data wireless PCI adapter
Prolink PixelView PlayTV Pro card (sucks)
Soundblaster live! Value
Running XP Pro & Linux
2. Laptop
Acer Aspire 1501LMi, Athlon 64 3000+ DTR, Ati 9600 (M10), 512 DDR333, 60GB hard disk, WinXP / WinXP 64 bit beta
Help with Acer 2012WLMI - Pro's and Con's
Discussion in 'Acer' started by brokejumper, Jul 28, 2004.