I have an Acer Extensa 2000, and an Acer Aspire 3630.
The Extensa is a 2.8ghz, 1.5 gigs memory, 80 gig hd, and an SD-R6112 DVD RW.
The Aspire is a 1.6 ghz, with 40gig hd,and 768 megs of ram, don't remember what DVDRW brand.
Extensa has all the latest updated drivers, as does the Aspire, but the Aspire runs faster than my Extensa. Whatever I thought was the problem (lack of hd space, not enough ram etc etc) I fixed, but it's still running slower than the Aspire.
Example: Using CloneDVDMobile to make avi for my PPC. It only takes 1 hour to do it with the Aspire, but after over 3 hours, only 50% completed with the Extensa.
All benchtesting comes back as normal for CPU and SODIMM speed, as does the PCI bus speeds.
What else can I do to speed the system up?
-
tried any benchmarking tools? ie, SuperPI, PCMark etc to see what results each system throws up? Maybe the Extensa needs a format
-
thats because Pentium M is faster than Pentium 4!!!
-
-
All tests show the Extensa and it's hardware are running up to specifications. -
use older Extensa drivers and try 3dmark2001se also try to dissable HT on P4.
what memory ur Extensa has? what speed? -
I am dling the 3dmark2001se now. I don't know about going back to older drivers, but if nothing else works, I will give that a try too. Thanks for the tips.
Edit: I installed 3dmark, and got error message. I am running with DirectX 9 and the error says it needs DX8 -
what gpu does ur Extensa has? if its an old one i would suggest going back to dx8.1 (because older gpu wont support dx9 features) also older drivers help alot and may improve system performance.
what speed is ur Ram and HDD? -
Speed of processor doesnt matter, my 2.8GHZ P4 desktop did that superPi thing in 5 minutes and a 1.6GHZ Laptop with Pentium M did it just under 2 minutes. Its how the core is not the speed as seen in previous AMD v Intel battles.
Why is my Extensa 2000 slower than my Aspire 3630?
Discussion in 'Acer' started by Nowonmai, Oct 22, 2006.