The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    Why is my Extensa 2000 slower than my Aspire 3630?

    Discussion in 'Acer' started by Nowonmai, Oct 22, 2006.

  1. Nowonmai

    Nowonmai Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I have an Acer Extensa 2000, and an Acer Aspire 3630.

    The Extensa is a 2.8ghz, 1.5 gigs memory, 80 gig hd, and an SD-R6112 DVD RW.

    The Aspire is a 1.6 ghz, with 40gig hd,and 768 megs of ram, don't remember what DVDRW brand.

    Extensa has all the latest updated drivers, as does the Aspire, but the Aspire runs faster than my Extensa. Whatever I thought was the problem (lack of hd space, not enough ram etc etc) I fixed, but it's still running slower than the Aspire.
    Example: Using CloneDVDMobile to make avi for my PPC. It only takes 1 hour to do it with the Aspire, but after over 3 hours, only 50% completed with the Extensa.

    All benchtesting comes back as normal for CPU and SODIMM speed, as does the PCI bus speeds.
    What else can I do to speed the system up?
     
  2. sionyboy

    sionyboy Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    100
    Messages:
    535
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    tried any benchmarking tools? ie, SuperPI, PCMark etc to see what results each system throws up? Maybe the Extensa needs a format
     
  3. applx

    applx Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    -2
    Messages:
    133
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    thats because Pentium M is faster than Pentium 4!!!
     
  4. Nowonmai

    Nowonmai Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I did say benchtesting was done. And new harddrive. Everything freshly installed. :)
     
  5. Nowonmai

    Nowonmai Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I understand and know PentM is faster, but what can I do to boost performance of Extensa. I really don't think the 1.6 ghz Aspire should be over 7x faster than 2.8ghz. Also, we have an older HP Compaq 1.2 ghz laptop, and it also runs faster.

    All tests show the Extensa and it's hardware are running up to specifications.
     
  6. applx

    applx Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    -2
    Messages:
    133
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    use older Extensa drivers and try 3dmark2001se also try to dissable HT on P4.
    what memory ur Extensa has? what speed?
     
  7. Nowonmai

    Nowonmai Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    As I originally posted the Extensa is a 2.8ghz, 1.5 gigs memory. Hyper-threading doesn't appear to be enabled in the BIOS.

    I am dling the 3dmark2001se now. I don't know about going back to older drivers, but if nothing else works, I will give that a try too. Thanks for the tips.

    Edit: I installed 3dmark, and got error message. I am running with DirectX 9 and the error says it needs DX8
     
  8. applx

    applx Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    -2
    Messages:
    133
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    what gpu does ur Extensa has? if its an old one i would suggest going back to dx8.1 (because older gpu wont support dx9 features) also older drivers help alot and may improve system performance.
    what speed is ur Ram and HDD?
     
  9. vitalinstinct

    vitalinstinct Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Speed of processor doesnt matter, my 2.8GHZ P4 desktop did that superPi thing in 5 minutes and a 1.6GHZ Laptop with Pentium M did it just under 2 minutes. Its how the core is not the speed as seen in previous AMD v Intel battles.