The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.

    M15x 3D Mark Review - Can you help me?

    Discussion in 'Alienware M15x' started by Vaeryl, Jul 14, 2015.

  1. Vaeryl

    Vaeryl Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Hi friends!

    I just acquired a Alienware m15x (early 2011), with a i7 720qm, GTX 680m 4GB, and 8Gb RAM.

    The first thing I did was test it on 3D Mark, but I think the score was very poor.

    Can you check it and tell me if its a normal score to a m15x with this configuration?

    The link is:

    http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/7760658


    If you guys think I can do a better test with another tool, feel free to say, and I will do it!



    Thanks!
     
  2. chopsy

    chopsy Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    57
    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    41
    It's a normal score. You need to change your cpu to a i7 920xm or 940xm if you want better performance. Also you need a 240W PSU and a right angled adaptor if you are upgrading your cpu.
     
  3. Alienware-L_Porras

    Alienware-L_Porras Company Representative

    Reputations:
    3,658
    Messages:
    6,874
    Likes Received:
    969
    Trophy Points:
    281
    Seems notmal to me. The processor might be the reason why the score doesn't go higher as said above.
     
  4. Vaeryl

    Vaeryl Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Friends, I just updated my VGA drivers to the lastest version (couldn't do it earlier because I didin't know I had to change the .inf files to install a new driver).

    See the new results:

    http://www.3dmark.com/sd/3197423


    Do you think I can get a VERY greater score changing my processor? How much % we're talking about?

    By the way, whats a "right angled adaptor"??


    Thanks!
     
  5. chopsy

    chopsy Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    57
    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    41
    That graphics score..what the fu..... :vbeek: :vbeek:
    Your gtx 680m is highly overclocked. Better check your temps while gaming or benching.

    Changing your processor will mostly double your combined score.

    This is a right angled adaptor: http://forum.notebookreview.com/threads/any-m15x-users-want-my-l-angled-pin-adapter.773765/
     
  6. Vaeryl

    Vaeryl Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Hi friends!

    New score after I bought a Samsung 128GB SSD 580 EVO and make a fresh install of Windows 7 Home Premium:

    http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/7864217


    btw, this test was made on a 23'' Full HD screen, the other tests were made on the m15x screen (1600x900).

    Chopsy, I dont think my VGA is overclocked, its reaching the stock clock of 758Mhz.

    Talking about temps.... I made a stress test with Fur Mark, and saw that, always my vga reach 90 celsius, its underclocks and never go beyond this temp. Its a normal behavior?


    Thx!
     
  7. Vaeryl

    Vaeryl Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    6
  8. deadsmiley

    deadsmiley Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    1,147
    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    702
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Yep, that's pretty good. The 920XM is your next upgrade. You have enough RAM.

    My framerates doubled in CS:GO when I just upgraded the CPU to a 920XM. It was pretty much unplayable at low settings until I got the 920XM. This is with the stock GT 240M.
     
  9. chopsy

    chopsy Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    57
    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    41
    My bad, I did not look at the test you ran, just at the score. I thought it was the 3dmark11 default bench. Those are great results after the right angled adaptor. Get a 920xm as deadsmiley says and a 240W PSU and enjoy your new beast!
     
  10. kosti

    kosti Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    2,162
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Can I ask what this right angled adapter is? Lol, I've been away from these forums for a while.
     
  11. TqM

    TqM Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Its simply an adapter that fits on your power cable so that it enters your laptop at a right angle instead of straight.

    Right angle adapters add no additional performance inherently. However some people pull the center pin on their adapters to disable communication between their laptop and PSU so that there is no power regulation by the laptop of the PSU.
    Additionally the right angle adapter helps lower stresses on the motherboards power adapter and your cable so that they last longer.
     
  12. kosti

    kosti Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    596
    Messages:
    2,162
    Likes Received:
    466
    Trophy Points:
    101
  13. King of Interns

    King of Interns Simply a laptop enthusiast

    Reputations:
    1,329
    Messages:
    5,418
    Likes Received:
    1,096
    Trophy Points:
    331
    I read earlier you tested with furmark? I really recommend NOT to use that tool. It simply is not a useful benchmarking/stress test tool.
    It is well known to simply heat the vrm's to melting point and cause gpu failure. Really dangerous software and no indication of real world gaming gpu usage.

    Glad you are enjoying the 680M. The 4GB version you have is still a competent card. I have the 2GB version and it struggles with lack of vram in most AAA titles that comes out now. I recommend clocking your card to 900mhz and bump your vram to 1000mhz for decent gains with zero need for extra voltage and little to no extra heat. After that you can test the limits of what your card can do. Most 680M's hit between 930-1000mhz on stock voltage on the core and between 1100-1200mhz on the vram.

    900/1000 is a good start from stock 760/900 that SLV7 vbios gives you. Tweak that baby and it can get close to the 780M/880M thanks to that 4GB :)
     
  14. Vaeryl

    Vaeryl Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    6
    King of Interns, Its really sad to read your advice about Furmark only now. I burned my m15x battery using this f******* tool. Forgot that the PSU cable was not connected and run Furmark, after 3 seconds, the laptop turned off and the battery never more charged. I have to buy other.

    About the clocks: I will try it and run 3D Mark again. Must check the temps too, its going to 83ºc when playing.

    UPDATE: With the core at 900Mhz and the memory clock ate 1000Mhz, I really had an excelent gain in performance, BUT, playing Battlefront on ULTRA settings, I had 89C temp on VGA :eek: Its 3C more than the stock clocks, but I think its very hot :(
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2015