The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    *OFFICIAL* M17x Benchmarks RESULTS *Part 2*

    Discussion in 'Alienware' started by the3vilGenius, Oct 11, 2009.

  1. cookinwitdiesel

    cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher

    Reputations:
    4,365
    Messages:
    11,264
    Likes Received:
    263
    Trophy Points:
    501
    I just did one run of the dual vs quad stuff john. will do a more thorough battery of runs this weekend though
     
    cookinwitdiesel, Jan 29, 2010
    #2851
  2. Mandrake

    Mandrake Notebook Nobel Laureate NBR Reviewer

    Reputations:
    4,976
    Messages:
    12,675
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    466
    What do you mean? I did post benchmarks with the T9900 and the QX9300.
     
    Mandrake, Jan 29, 2010
    #2852
  3. Johnksss

    Johnksss .

    Reputations:
    11,531
    Messages:
    19,450
    Likes Received:
    12,808
    Trophy Points:
    931
    and both of your cpus are above 2.0 ghz correct?
    try down clocking your qx to 2.0 ghz or the t9900
     
    Johnksss, Jan 29, 2010
    #2853
  4. Kade Storm

    Kade Storm The Devil's Advocate

    Reputations:
    1,596
    Messages:
    1,860
    Likes Received:
    202
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Yup. Your last test did not run properyly, because your average is too high. This has been a common problem with many ATi users.
     
    Kade Storm, Jan 29, 2010
    #2854
  5. rolex1

    rolex1 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    18
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Are you sure its not due to the resolution being 1280x1024 with medium settings?
     
    rolex1, Jan 29, 2010
    #2855
  6. rolex1

    rolex1 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    18
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The Q9000 is the reason for those scores..
    Your i7 is far more powerful..
    Anyway..
    The sole purpose of these benchmarks was to compare the Q9000 to the QX9300 while both processors are running at relatively the same speed(around 2.5ghz)

    [​IMG]

    Getting closer to that 14,000!

    Since I've maxed my FSB and MEM frequency to 1333..Can someone with a QX9300+4870CF lower their processor clock to 2.49/2.500Ghz and run 3dMark06 and post their score?
     
    rolex1, Jan 29, 2010
    #2856
  7. BatBoy

    BatBoy Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    7,395
    Messages:
    7,964
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    206
    BatBoy, Jan 30, 2010
    #2857
← Previous page