The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous pageNext page →

    Asus UL30JT

    Discussion in 'Asus' started by Hihi, Jan 9, 2010.

  1. dirtymaf

    dirtymaf Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    39
    Messages:
    62
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I've been looking at the N82 as well. I've been comparing these two machines and am coming to the conclusion that slightly larger, heavier machine is worth it since it will have the 335M, faster proc. and Optimus. I'm hoping the initial reviews for battery life are positive for this model.

    I will probably be looking at this Acer as well now. That's what happens when you wait too long to get new tech to market, it can end up obsolete before it even hits the shelf.
     
  2. joni99

    joni99 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    acer - Intel® Core i7-620M processor = (Watt) 35

    Intel® Core i5-430M/i5-520M/i5-540M processor = (Watt) 35

    6-cell battery pack


    asus - Intel Core i7 620UM = (Watt) 18

    Intel Core i5 520UM = (Watt) 18

    8-cell battery pack

    Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 = (Watt) 10


    asus twice the battery acer twice the performance ?
     
  3. ojt

    ojt Newbie

    Reputations:
    10
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
  4. lackofcheese

    lackofcheese Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    464
    Messages:
    2,897
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Yeah, I should've also said I was looking for upper-midrange graphics cards.
    The CPU isn't the only device that eats power; once you start to factor those in it isn't a factor of two anymore. Still, while ASUS' 10-hour claim seems reasonable, I'd expect 6/7 from the Acer, not 8. We'll find out once they get released and reviewed, I guess.
     
  5. nvikram

    nvikram Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    http://purplejunction.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/failurerates.png

    This from a company called SquareTrade that runs failure rates every year. These results are from 2009. HP is the worst with about 25% failure rate. Asus is the best with about 15% failure rate. Acer has a failure rate of about 23% and is the third worst. I'm not saying that Asus is the end all be all, but as a student, I need a laptop with a great battery (5+ hours) and I need it to last, so I'm officially torn with all these options.
     
  6. a2bucks

    a2bucks Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Thanks! Always good to back up my thinking of which laptop I'm going to buy. I'm patiently waiting to see the release date and pricing of the UL/PL30JT and then deciding between either of them and the VT.
     
  7. fscussel

    fscussel Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Man, I believe you just found my next notebook!! really, it's almost the same weight as this UL30JT but with MUCH more powerfull components... I will just wait for a review to see if the ergonomics (temperature, trackpad, keyboard) are good for daily use and i'm ready to go...
     
  8. sn_85

    sn_85 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    People will believe anything as long as it comes in a simple bar graph. Nevermind that they never published anything about testing parameters so the numbers could be skewed. That's like saying the HP Probook 5310m sucks and has a 23% fail rate but oh wait in our "study" we never received one that was broken, those numbers are all from low end HPs that were broken. Squaretrade sells warranties, you ever think that factors in some?
     
  9. a2bucks

    a2bucks Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    True on what you say. However, this is not the first source I've heard about problems with HP.
     
  10. praneeth

    praneeth Sanath Jaya Suriya!!!

    Reputations:
    38
    Messages:
    881
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Looks like Asus wants to sell a few more of the UL30vt which are still popular and selling well. Why start selling a new model while the existing UL30 is selling so well?
     
  11. DukeTheGold

    DukeTheGold Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    I did my share of research on laptops, but I am really wary about buying laptops from HP and particularly Acer. One of the reasons why HP products have such high failure rate is because it is the company that used to sell the most laptops in the market and the majority of it is low end laptops. Hence the high failure rate. I'd still trust HP's high end laptops with premium build, if the price is right.

    As for Acer, to be honest I'd never buy a laptop from them because of all the horror stories I have heard. Even for upper range laptops, I get the feeling that they malfunction more than they should over time. You will find very few Acer fans compare to the rest of the brands.

    Asus, on the other hand, has a very good reputation. There is a good reason why they are willing to dish out a 2 year warranty instead of the standard 1 year.
     
  12. nvikram

    nvikram Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Don't forget that Asus also comes with one year of accidental damage protection.
     
  13. helderlima

    helderlima Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    For me and all my friends, HP notebooks have 100% failure rate. I´m not kidding.
     
  14. fscussel

    fscussel Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I hope that doesn't occours with ACCER's
     
  15. EateryOfPiza

    EateryOfPiza Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I second this. If you add in repeat failures (ie the laptop died again after they got it back from warranty repair), the rate jumps up to 150%. :D
     
  16. slumpey326

    slumpey326 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  17. Ghost26

    Ghost26 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    nice ! thanks for the link. Well at leat we know it might be for this month or April...

    I noticed the Ethernet connection is only 10/100 for UL30JT ... a detail for some, but a real need for me with frequent data transfer ... If this is really the case, it would be the only bad thing about this laptop :(

    Nothing on a UL33JT as expected on CES ... The U33JC will have less battery life... Bamboo looks cool... but I would have preferred a ULV CPU for it... :(
     
  18. slumpey326

    slumpey326 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I see the pl30jt only has one processor option while the ul30jt has three.
     
  19. EateryOfPiza

    EateryOfPiza Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Yeah, this is disheartening. I hope a reseller like xoticpc can take the PL30JT and allow customization.
     
  20. slumpey326

    slumpey326 Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    11
    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I just want to know when the pj30jt or ul30jt are available, I thought some said possibly the 15th of march
     
  21. Ghost26

    Ghost26 Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    We still don't have a confirmed release date, but it's between Now and the end of April.
     
  22. YESHHHH

    YESHHHH Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    26
    Messages:
    272
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    If this is any indication, we could possibly see the UL30JT go on Amazon.com preorder on March 9 or March 10 :D.
     
  23. praneeth

    praneeth Sanath Jaya Suriya!!!

    Reputations:
    38
    Messages:
    881
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    The U30JC went on Energy Star with a market date of Jan 21st or something like that. It's yet to see light of day although available for pre-order through a couple of gray market channels.

    So, yes it could be March 9th or 10th but it could also be April or even May. :confused:
     
  24. joni99

    joni99 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    we waited enough

    March 10-15
    :yes:
     
  25. ckthepilot

    ckthepilot Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    220
    Messages:
    1,044
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Where did you get that date from? o_O

    I'm thinking April/May :)
     
  26. Miguel86

    Miguel86 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
  27. Pivot

    Pivot Newbie

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    In the description in the image it says "Smudge-proof satin-brushed aluminium LCD and palm rest" so that would mean that it's indeed aluminium.
     
  28. joni99

    joni99 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
  29. nvikram

    nvikram Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    For over two months, we've been asking the exact same question. Welcome to the club :)
     
  30. nvikram

    nvikram Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I know everyone's been saying that the GT 310M is a entry-level graphics card, but in case your like me and can't really picture what that would feel like. A guy with a UL30VT-A1, which has a GT 210M (Same card, shaders a little slower and less RAM) has posted some gaming videos which are pretty good. If anything the GT 310M will perform probably 2-5fps higher.

    Starcraft 2 Beta: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-_DBd6Xc_M

    Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_rGIkHWjmw

    Borderlands: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hpt45yKPfAU
     
  31. 09ine

    09ine Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    1
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I am completely confused now, some people a couple pages back said the PL30JT is the UL30JT, did they not know what they were talking about or has that been disproven?
     
  32. MasterEvilAce

    MasterEvilAce Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    14
    Messages:
    71
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    it's the same but with additional business-oriented features
     
  33. Santino12

    Santino12 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Ok, here is the underlying question that matters most - how will the UL30JT / PL30JT compare to the UL30VT-A1 in performance? Specifically, I'm referring to processor performance, as I'm not concerned about the graphics other than the fact that they will enable me to watch 1080 streaming video seamlessly.

    UL30VT-A1: SU7300 - 1.3GHz --> 1.76GHz
    PL30JT / UL30JT (lower end): i5-520UM - 1.06 --> 1.86
    UL30JT (mid range): i7-620UM - 1.06 --> 2.13
    UL30JT (top): i7-640UM - 1.2 --> 2.26

    Can anyone answer how these processors would compare in performance? Is it a simple calculation of 1.86 / 1.76 = 5.6% increase, or is there more to the calculation?

    I've wasted the last several months of my life researching the UL30, then the UL30VT, then the UL30JT, and now the PL30JT, and I need to make a decision. Couldn't even open I-tunes on my Inspiron 6000 yesterday...

    Thank you.
     
  34. finnboy000

    finnboy000 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    The westmeres are definitely faster than the older gen core2s. So there is more to it than just a simple calculation as you mentioned :D This chart at Anandtech's gives you a little hint of the performance improvement over the previous gen http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3704&p=7 check the core2duo E8600 and i5 661 (core2 and a westmere). The entire article might be good reading if you are not familiar with the westmere architecture and the benefits it has (hyperthreading that aws introduced already with Nehalem, turbo boost, high level of integration and extremely low power leakage).
    I think it is irrelevant to compare SU7300 to i7620UM/640UM, they are the most efficient mobile computing when released. They are very low energy but still pack a considerable degree of computing power. If they manage to pack the ul30jt with nVidia optimus this package will be unbeatable in terms of performance/battery life.
     
  35. finnboy000

    finnboy000 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
  36. VenomXv

    VenomXv Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    13
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    Which one will give the user a longer battery life? The SU7300 or the i5-520UM, i7-620um, etc? Thanks!
     
  37. finnboy000

    finnboy000 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I wonder if they will make a ul30Js model. It should have a 160Gb ssd according to their naming scheme. Would be nice, even though it will bump up the price considerably and if they pack in a cheap, crappy ssd it won't be a good deal.
     
  38. finnboy000

    finnboy000 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    The i7 620UM/640UM/i5 520UM have all the same TDP value of 18W while the SU7300 has a TDP of 10W but we must not to forget that the newer processors pack memory controller, pcie controller and most importantly the IGP on die with the CPU. I read somewhere that someone had calculated that the power consumption of the SU7300+chipset+IGP was something like 23W and the i7 620UM etc. had 21W so it should consume less energy. On the other hand the ul30jt has discrete graphics but so does the ul30vt...and the jt has nVidia optimus (just checked it, they announced it somewhere..) which means that it'll be very efficient graphics wise. The jt has also slightly larger battery (vt has 5600mAh, jt has 5800mAh) so I could say that the battery should last as long as the vt's or even longer (about 9-10h of light browsing according to some reviews).
     
  39. praneeth

    praneeth Sanath Jaya Suriya!!!

    Reputations:
    38
    Messages:
    881
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Well, if the published numbers are an indication the battery lives for the new models are definitely less. Published 10hrs vs 12hrs. As Tom's Hardware noted in their tests the new chips are quite power efficient but they are considerably more powerful than the last generation and that will take up some battery life. Also Optimus is really a convenience feature when comparing to a hard switch that completely switches off the graphics card. At best it will give same battery life as the physical switch and in most cases it will be marginally less battery life because the computer is switching back and forth (rather than being forced to run without the GPU for the entire time if there was a physical switch).

    Obviously, 10 hrs is still a lot of battery life.
     
  40. joni99

    joni99 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    5
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Very interesting ! Good to know :)
     
  41. finnboy000

    finnboy000 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I haven't been fortunate enough to come across this information, thank you for telling me this! I agree, 10hrs is a lot.
    I agree on the super energy saving occasions but Optimus might be more efficient in involving hw acceleration for optimal user experiance (read: gaming) compared to previous technologies in graphics switching. It will shut down the discrete gpu even when running a 3d program, if the extra power is not needed (for example menus in a 3d game). With no real third party reviews or tests it is very difficult to say anything more about Optimus' energy efficiency.
    I am pretty sure that there is a way to force the optimus use only IGP when the user wants the ultimate battery life.
     
  42. EateryOfPiza

    EateryOfPiza Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    24
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Thanks to hardware assisted HD decoding, any processor, even an Atom, paired with a modern graphics card from either AMD or Nvidia can decode h.264 1080p video flawlessly.
     
  43. yus9

    yus9 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    166
    Messages:
    410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    These new Acers were discussed here a few pages back.
    A quick update...

    "Acer Will Launch Calpella Platform Notebooks At The End Of March 2010, Says CEO
    DIGITIMES [Friday 5 March 2010] Linky
    3820T Specs at Acer
     
  44. g0at

    g0at Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    At least that's less nebulous than the dates we had before.

    Still, what's the price?!
     
  45. lackofcheese

    lackofcheese Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    464
    Messages:
    2,897
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Well, Lenovo's Y460 is $1200 for the HD 5650 model, so I would expect the Acer at $1000 or so.
     
  46. Bronsky

    Bronsky Wait and Hope.

    Reputations:
    1,653
    Messages:
    9,239
    Likes Received:
    247
    Trophy Points:
    231
    I hope your right but i'll be that the I7-620M/HD 5650 will be more. $1,400?
     
  47. lackofcheese

    lackofcheese Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    464
    Messages:
    2,897
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    I would expect a basic Core i3/HD 5470 model at $800 or less.
    Hopefully, there ought to be a Core i5/HD 5650 model around $1000.
    For a model with the i7-620M, you might be looking at closer to $1200, but I wouldn't bother.
     
  48. YESHHHH

    YESHHHH Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    26
    Messages:
    272
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    How come? Not worth the +$200?
     
  49. lackofcheese

    lackofcheese Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    464
    Messages:
    2,897
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    Well, all the i7-620M has going for it over the i5-520M is ~15% faster clock speed. Wikipedia states $225 for the 520M and $332 for the 620M, but I would expect additional manufacturer markup on higher-end CPUs.

    The upgrade might be worth it to some people, but not me.
     
  50. namezox1

    namezox1 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Acer 3820TG or Asus UL30JT?
     
← Previous pageNext page →