Under-clocking worked great. So far, no more throttling while playing over an hour of games (which used to throttle every 10 minutes or so). It even kept CPU temps below 85 (previously were over 95 quite often). VID is now 1.05, stable and no impact on performance.
Thanks for the good direction, Seeker.
-
-
-
Would it be foolish to do a 650/1100 OC? Would the 650 preserve some battery under light load versus 750MHz? -
-
hey seeker did u try disabling hpet? bcause many forums suggested that disabling hpet reduced the micro shutter in many games?
-
-
Also, start with your mem clocks, and get them as high as they go without artifact errors in OCCT, then worry about your core clocks afterwards.
I don't think that battery life difference between 650 and 750 core would be too much, as you probably won't be gaming on battery too often, and as long as your power play settings are set to maximize battery life when unplugged, your BIOS won't pick the OC clocks anyways. The OC clocks should only become active when plugged in and playing a game. All other times it should remain stock. -
^ Good information. I see you're at 813/1067. I'm curious how you came about those numbers.
I want to bump my OC up a bit more since sometimes when I'm playing games, the FPS gets in the 10 range and its impossible to play. -
-
^ Haha I see. Care to share??
-
-
Oh duh. Sure I'll try that out. Was thinking of going with 1100 but baby steps.
-
This is eminently achievable with a soft-mod (which I currently have in place) - but this means that the card is functioning with only partial FirePro capabilities (not all the 3D stuff is properly unlocked with my soft-mod, which is a very basic version - other soft-mods described on forums elsewhere manage to unlock practically all the FirePro capabilities)...
The problem with it is that you must use unsigned drivers etc, and place your windows in "test mode" - this is all fine, and the watermark is easily removed, but then, there is the inconvenience of having to manually OK all the windows updates - just in case windows decides to update your videocard driver (in which case, the card will revert back to being a plain old mobility Radeon!)...
The theory is that BIOS-modding the DeviceID will make Windows install the FirePro drivers - and this should not be a problem, seeing that the hardware is all there and capable of it (the soft-mods and benchmarks using them prove this is true)...
Unfortunately, there seems to be a mechanism in place that prevents the GPU from booting up when the BIOS has been changed in that way... I don't know how/why this is the case... I've temporarily given up the chase, but may try a different DeviceID (i.e. the one for M5725, if I can find it) in the future... Will report back on findings... There is no laptop model that uses the M5725, though, that I can find... -
conscriptvirus Notebook Evangelist
just curious but how do u get the bios from the dell site? it's in a .exe form and i dont know how to get bios itself.
-
cheers,
dave -
Update re: trying to BIOS alter the DeviceID - I tried changing the DeviceID from 9488 to 9489 (Firepro M5750 - which is apparently directly based on the Mobility 4670)...
Result: Epic FAIL...
Same 6-beeps issue on startup, I still haven't gotten around to finding out what the startup beep code means, but I figure that that won't be helpful in any case...
Oh well ;p Stick with soft-modding!
cheers,
dave -
There are better instructions somewhere.. thought it was here, but maybe I'm just blind. -
Brendanmurphy Your Worst Nightmare
Temps overclocked, with MX4 artic paste and zalman after 3 hours of starcraftBefore i changed paste gpu was in 80c range.
-
-
-
Hi seeker_moc.
I'm considering OC my gt425m on my xps 14, still reading the thread trying to figure out the basic procedures, never done anything like this before.
Meanwhile, it would be nice if you can make a modded bios for xps 14 with gt425m so I can jump right ahead into it -
-
-
phlash16.exe /x /s bios-file
* change the bios-file to the actual BIOS file, e.g. 1645.WPH. -
Do you know why we're using 300/800 running at 1.2v clocks when external screen is connected? I'm having some issues with the new screen and trying to figure out where the problem is.
-
-
(taken from my Studio 1557)
The one you currently use should be fixed already like this:-
I ask because I want to get a visual confirmation. That's all.Last edited by a moderator: Feb 6, 2015 -
-
-
-
So I was playing bulletstorm and my performance was terrible no matter how low i set my settings. I opened AMD GPU Clock Tool to check the speed and for some reason it would not go past 300/300. I was on High Performance power plan, too. I had to manually set it to 750/1000 to get it to run nicely. Is there a reason why its doing this? Its not too hot or anything. I think it may be doing this in other games but i thought it was lag.
-
- Set the external screen as primary/main display. I can't remember whether it will work properly in extended mode (internal screen become secondary display) or not but I remember the flickering stop when setting the external screen as the only display in Control Panel (e.g. show desktop only on 2).
- Only overclock GPU clock in BIOS.
I chose option no. 2 on my Studio 1557. -
Last edited by a moderator: Feb 6, 2015
-
-
-
Still can play games or watching movies on the external screen.
The other workaround I found which work for me is whenever I work with external monitor in extended mode, I turn off PowerPlay. When PowerPlay off, on my notebook the core & memory clock will stayed at 500MHz & 800MHz respectively. This way external screen won't flicker & I'm able to concentrate on my work.
However, the PowerPlay trick maybe only work on my notebook since the "Default Clock" doesn't change (still stock clock), only "GPU Clock" are overclocked.Last edited by a moderator: Feb 6, 2015 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
Alright, thanks.
-
Quick question: what's the cause of artefacting with overclocking? It's definitely not temperatures (when I tried faster O/C settings, I got artefact already with temp low 70's - on the other hand, the temp can go up to 80+ with lower O/C settings, i.e. 750/900, and no artefact turns up)...
Is it likely that the culprit is memory, or the GPU clock?
cheers,
dave -
-
Thanks Seeker - I'll play around with the clocks then, but not looking particularly good for my particular card - 750/900 is very stable and artefact free... But 780/940 gives me artefacts... 800/1000 gave me a bit of instability as well...
I'll play around, then come up with some sort of working combo! Looks like mine's the least o'c-able of the 4670's out there, at present... (I'm still waiting on the 130W adapter though, which is on the way - previous owner of the laptop I don't think was greatly into gaming, and has a desktop anyway, so they didn't bother with it... It's on the way now, though... And, perhaps, that will enable more o'c than with the 90W...)
cheers,
dave -
-
-
-
^ Yeah, I'm planning on swapping my odd with a hdd tray so I'll upgrade my thermal paste while I have it apart.
BIOS modding for GPU OC fun and profit!!
Discussion in 'Dell XPS and Studio XPS' started by seeker_moc, Sep 30, 2010.