3DMark 11

Here is mine, specs in Sig.
5850 oc'ed to 960/1135
Score: 2790
Result

 

Result

overclocked to 825/1650/1450

 

M15x -- 820QM/5850M o/c to 900/1100 -- P2555

Result

​

 

Blah, so did I.

Nice OC!

Are those longterm stable? Did you play with your voltage at all?

 

Ya I can play on those voltages (hasn't crashed in a game yet anyway). I haven't played with my voltages at all. Just keeping with the stock for now. I'm getting a very playable FPS in the games I play and I dont really want to fry something with a bad vbios flash. Plus when i tried to see if overvolting it was possible, I couldn't seem to find a program that it would work with...NiBiTor doesn't work (since the last time I tried it anyway).

 

Now you mention it it does look low considering the i5-520m quite a fast dual core processor. What's causing this? Oh well I'll try it again soon to see if it changes.

 

Here's my results (AMD phenom2 N930, ATI HD 5650 overclocked to 725/1000)

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/63683;jsess...dm11/63683?key=MrZHr90mAE5kYP3SxfcxmzR369LjJv

Hey looks like I'm winning against your i5 520M Cakefish .




edit: I too have the letterbox issue (or maybe its supposed to be like that?).

 

I own an acer notebook with i5 430m, 4gb of Ram and HD5650 (clocked 650/850) my final score is P1173

 

3DMark Score
P1454
Graphics score
1301
Physics Score
4158
Combined Score
1332

Result

 

I'm beginning to suspect that my specific machine has trouble with DX11. I need some way to confirm...

 

Ha, looks like I was right! I downloaded the DiRT 2 demo to test my DX11 performance. The demo wouldn't play for some reason, but it did install something involving DirectX.

Yesterday's result: Result

P538

Today's result: Result

P1059

So basically my problem with DX11 cut the result in half. Wow.

Now if only my CPU were cool enough to allow me to OC.

 

do you guys think a single gpu laptop will be able to break 3k?

 

Maybe an HD 6970M (likely OC'd) paired with an i7-2920XM will be able to.

 

I think a 470M/920-940XM might do 3K. Tech17 got over 13K (GPU=10,894) in Vantage with that setup in a Sager 8690. With that, plus the PhysX boost and the increased tessellation performance, it ought to break 3K in 3dMark11.

 

Did the Dx11 update also improve your system's actual ingame performance in non-Dx11 games? I'm wondering about this because your physics got boosted a lot even though it's CPU lol.

 

3DMark 11 doesn't use PhysX for physic test, it uses Bullet phyiscs engine for physics test (CPU only)

 

first test ran...

p2488
Results
e3334
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/23185

side note...amd is getting murdered in 3dmark11

 

Oh yeah, big time. My physics test framerate is only 3/4 of what equivalent i5 CPU users are getting.

 

what is your physics score?

 

2097 ;_;

my results are here

 

well thats interesting....2k....mine happens to be about 7k with 920xm

 

P2057 with my GX740 no oc's.

Good? Bad? Regular?

ps. Max temps on AMD GPU Clock Tool
TSS0 = 70c
TSS1 = 76c
TSS2 = 70c

 

OK, my first run of 11 with no OC or anything changed AT ALL including pastes or mods...

(Basic Edition 3dMark 11 using AMD 10.11 / CAP 3)

P3909

Graphics 3848
Physics 4886
Combined 3310

Gpu test 1 19.81fps
Gpu test 2 18.75fps
Gpu test 3 22.9fps
Gpu test 4 10.92fps

Physics test 15.51fps
Combined test 15.4fps

Not too bad methinks for my spec (see below) , did one more run and came out at P3921....

Gonna try and uninstall/reinstall CAP profiles as CAP 4 is out and release notes say improved crossfire for 3dmark 11....might give some more points eh? - will see...wouldnt mind breaking 4k....

Available here: Rage3D Exclusive - New AMD Catalyst Application Profile 10.11 #4 - Rage3D Discussion Area

 

mine was around 7300 with the 940

 

Yeah the AMD CPU is showing up as being really anemic in these tests, there has to be a way of overclocking it other than pin mod (which might not work depending on what PLL it has).

 

AMD CPUs have been inferior to i7 arch since the day it came out. Only when you do hugely multithreaded stuff (video encoding) on a 6-core Thuban does it beat a 4-core i7. The uarch is barely changed since K8, and 3800+ X2 were outpaced by the first Conroe waaaaay back when.

Shows the K8 was well designed though, way back when it was. Let's see if their genuinely new CPUs (Dozer) can really shine. Especially if they OC well... anything would be better than what's capable with SB (except of course the pay-more-for-identical-CPU tweakable versions)

I'm just thread crapping because I only have a G92-based DX10-capable GPU

 

where do you get this program? Interested to see what score i get with my G73.
I think i'll have a heart attack when i see my score from what i'm seeing here

Panther214

 

Result

P1348 with mobility 5650

 

Wow! Nice OC.

 

P2037 3DMarks (going to try turbo mode now)

 

3DMark Score
P2056
Graphics score
1945
Physics Score
2887
Combined Score
2051
GraphicsTest1
10.07 FPS
GraphicsTest2
9.78 FPS
GraphicsTest3
11.78 FPS
GraphicsTest4
5.36 FPS
PhysicsTest
9.17 FPS
CombinedTest
9.54 FPS

 

its a bit of a test to say the least!

 

Thanks, I can run the card at a little over 780Mhz core if I want to, but at 800 the system completely uses stability. I also get artifacts at about 980 on the memory so I can't get to 1Ghz...

 

Result

 

nice score Gatelel. was that oc'ed or stock????

 

its my 5850m, the rest is the same. I have the clocks at 800 / 1100

 

Result

3DMark Score
P2383

Graphics score
2319

Physics Score
2757

Combined Score
2397

 

http://3dmark.com/3dm11/142398

3DMark Score
P4694

Graphics score
4858
Physics Score
4628
Combined Score
3814
GraphicsTest1
25.0 FPS
GraphicsTest2
23.4 FPS
GraphicsTest3
28.64 FPS
GraphicsTest4
13.94 FPS
PhysicsTest
14.69 FPS
CombinedTest
17.74 FPS

 

i tried runnin the test a little while ago and my NP8850 went loopy. i got to the combined GPU + CPU test. it started up for a few seconds then the screen went black for about 30 seconds. all of a sudden my caps lock, num lock, and scroll lock lights started flashing, along with a BEEP BEEP BEEP sound. my lights flashed and the beeping went on for about a min then my laptop shut off. during the whole time, i was feeling the air coming out of my exhaust and it was pretty cool. nothing out of the norm.

should i be worried? i did have a weird driver crash about a week or 2 ago. after the crash my screen was acting really strange. there were tears and artifacts everywhere. i barely made it out enough to download a new driver off of the nvidia site, and do a driver delete/install. everything returned back to normal after that.

 

stock or over clocked?

 

New score: 4757

3DMark Score
P4757
Graphics score
4923

Physics Score
4664<------------Core i7-720QM sucks! I'd have broken 5k if I had a 920xm
Combined Score
3894
GraphicsTest1
25.22 FPS
GraphicsTest2
24.16 FPS
GraphicsTest3
29.0 FPS
GraphicsTest4
14.01 FPS
PhysicsTest
14.81 FPS
CombinedTest
18.12 FPS

 

I had the same thing happen to me today as well. I have almost the exact same comp/setup as you except 2x320gig hard drives and just a blue-ray reader.
Everything was running stock settings for me, nothing tweeked or anything.

 

Still, thats a heck of a score with a 720qm....noticed quite a large OC on the gpu's and different driver this time? - is that a modded desktop driver?

 

i run ati overdrive auto tune and got this result with 795/ 1190

Result

 

hmmm...that's odd. mine is pretty much stock as well. no OC'ing and the only thing i've changed since i received my laptop was it's GPU and wifi drivers. i got both from their official sites.

 

Updated to CAP 4 and absolutely no difference whatsoever...so much for improved crossfire performance....same point score for me and infact, sometimes, less.....

Any chance ive done something wrong....i just saved the CAP 4 to desktop and ran it....thats it!

Anyone else noticed no improvement with this set of profiles?

 

Just to be clear, i did have the latest drivers from the nvidia website.

I reran the test twice since the first time didn't work, and it succesfully completed both times.

Here are the results:

3DMark Score
P2367
Graphics score
2171
Physics Score
4779
Combined Score
2198
GraphicsTest1
9.44 FPS
GraphicsTest2
9.81 FPS
GraphicsTest3
13.53 FPS
GraphicsTest4
7.05 FPS
PhysicsTest
15.17 FPS
CombinedTest
10.22 FPS

 

1 day old M15x, gtx460m. Looking for some overclocked scores, mine is completely stock..... ati 5850 scores are definitely way better so far, i really need to overclock it to see what it can really do!

processor
Intel Core i7 Mobile
Processor clock
1862 MHz
Physical / logical processors
1 / 8
# of cores
4
Graphics Card
Graphics Card
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
# of cards
1
SLI / CrossFire
Off
Memory
1536 MB
Core clock
570 MHz
Memory clock
1250 MHz
Driver name
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460M
Driver version
8.17.12.5964
Driver status
Not FM Approved
General
Operating system
64-bit Windows 7 (6.1.7600)
Motherboard
Alienware
Hard drive model
Memory
8192 MB
Module 1
4096 MB Samsung 9 @ 667 MHz
Module 2
4096 MB Samsung 9 @ 667 MHz
Detailed scores
3DMark Score
P1573
Graphics score
1413
Physics Score
4600
Combined Score
1390
GraphicsTest1
6.49 FPS
GraphicsTest2
6.69 FPS
GraphicsTest3
8.55 FPS
GraphicsTest4
4.34 FPS
PhysicsTest
14.61 FPS
CombinedTest
6.47 FPS
Settings

 

Nope, the score didn't improve with newer drivers or if it did, it was very small.

I didn't notice any improvement with CAP 4 either. Just another empty AMD promise.

 

Well i kinda thought that may be the case........improved performance...my butt....