3DMark05 for various notebooks

Do a thread search for some overclocking threads. . . there are a lot of them. HyperMemory is enabled automatically.

 

first let me say im not trying to start a flame here but im a little confused.i was looking at the 05 scores listed on the first page of this thread,and i must say they all seem low for the hardware involved. for example (2.8 GHz AMD FX-60, nVidia 7900 GTX 256Mb, 17" 1680x1050, 2GB, 2x100GB 7200rmp, 5kg, 1h) that machine with an fx60,and a 7900gtx scores a bit lower than my desktop with an opteron 144 and 2x7600gs cards in an sli. the desktop version of the 7900gtx a single card smokes mine easy. are the notebook versions of these high end cards really crippled or what.

 

Hi Folks,

I have an Xi1546 (2.0GHz, 1GB, 2 x 100GB) that came with XP Home. I've had to install XP Pro for work, which as it turns out is not supported by FSC , and since then I've had the dreaded BSOD with "Stop errors" / "IRQL less or equal than", especially while gaming. I suspect it's the FSC version of the catalyst driver, and I would like to install the 6.6 Catalyst Driver, but it won't let me

DH Mod Tool does not support the X1800 yet .... any ideas?

BTW, I get 3079 on 3DMark 06 .... haven't run 05 yet.

Chrz,

TReBeL

 

I had the same problem.
Try updating the ati drivers through the device manager and don't update with the automatic options, but "choose" which drivers you would like to install. Then you can choose the x1800 from the list. It worked for me....

swank

 

Thanks for the great topic but there is something you need to consider, u wrote:

"-- Most portable for gaming: Asus W3J -- very good gaming capabilities, it's thin and light (2.2kg)"

Shouldn't the Asus A8Jm be a better protable gaming notebook judging by the better scores, specs and overall value (score/price) than the Asus W3? Also taking into consideration the fact that it (AJ8m) weighs only 200g (2.4kg) more than the W3 and is almost the same size!

 

hmmmm.......6021 on a Toshiba P105-S9312 with a 256mb 7900GS

 

Yes, the desktop versions of these cards are usually not comparable to their notebook equivalents (this has been true for quite a while.... sort of like how the ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 was not the same thing as a desktop Radeon 9700).

-Zadillo

 

Hrmm, is that right? So it actually scores lower than the previous P105-S912? I wonder why that would be. Only thing I can think of is that the P105-S9312 has a 200 gig 4200RPM HD, but it also has more RAM factory installed, and a 2GHz Core Duo instead of 1.83 GHz. You'd think that would count for something.

 

I don't think it had much to do with the hard drive. I have updated drives and it scored much higher, can't remember what it was off the top of head. Will re-test and post back later.

 

You can add my score to the table if you want. My score and spec are in my sig, i didnt see the pathetic go7300 in the chart lol!

 

I just ran a test w/ 3Dmark05 on my E1705 and got 6241. Seems decent. Stock out the box system:

Inspiron 9400/E1705 Notebook: Intel Core Duo Processor T2300 (1.66GHz/667MHz FSB

System Price : $1,189.00
Free shipping

Operating System-
Genuine Windows XP Media Center 2005

Memory-
1 GB DDR2 SDRAM 533MHz (2 DIMMs)

Hard Disk Drive-
100 GB EIDE Hard Drive (5400 RPM)

Video-
256MB NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS

Base-
Inspiron 9400/E1705 Notebook: Intel Core Duo Processor T2300 (1.66GHz/667MHz FSB)

Media Bay-
8x DVD +/- RW w/dbl layer write capability

Network Interface Card-
Intel Pro Wireless 3945
Bluetooth Wireless Card

NoteBook Screen-
17 inch UltraSharp Wide Screen UXGA Notebook Screen

Previously Ordered New

Misc
Base Assembly
9 Cell Battery
90W AC Adapter

 

Dell 9400

T2500
100GB 5400RPM
1GB 533 2DIMM
nVidia 7900GS
WIN XP MCE

3D MARK 05 ==>> 6325

 

Mine beats urs 8) of course, mines OC'd too 450/1100

 

Just noticed that the Gateway M285-E and Toshiba M7-117 Tablet PC's are 2.8kg each. Doh!

This gotta be the biggest prank you can do to your employees - making them carrying around on their arms all day! I'd quit that job if I were in their position...

 

Nobody has integrated x1150? I'm looking for a notebook with it (hp nx6325) and it would really help me to choose between integrated or dedicated graphic card

 

Ok My new Laptop::
SONY VAIO AR11S
17" wxga double lamp xblack 1920x1200
T2500 (2.0ghz core duo)
weight: 3.8Kg
Battery: 1hr 30min
1gig ddr2 800
Geforce 7600GT go 256 meg
Hard Drive: 2x 100gig 5400rpm
HDMI
Motion Eye web cam
wifib/g and bluetooth 2
On Digital TV Receiver
Blue Ray Disc Player/Burner
WinXP MCE
Cost £1784 (SAME MODEL IN USA WITH BLUERAYBURNER/PLAYER is $2199)
3Dmark 05 = 4902 at stock 5877 overclocked at 600/725

 

I was bored so I overclocked my go7300 to see what I can get;

Dell E1505
T2300 2GB OCZ 667MHZ
Go7300 433/739 Dell driver



Perfectly stable and it stays 5C cooler than a stock X1300(which was giving me a problem with my firewire soundcard).....

 

i'm new to the whole benchmarking scene, what resolution are you supposed to use when you benchmark? 1024x768? are you supposed to turn down all the settings for your video card to the lowest/performance before you start?

 

I'd Like to see some marks for the X1600. I'm looking at getting an MSI 1039 but wonder if that card is any better than the x700 that comes in the 1029?

 

We use the standard test in 3DMark05, 1024x768 resolution. If you download the free version, that is the only thing you can run.

 

Hey guys ill throw my score in.

System in sig

3dmark05

NON OC
core 350 mem 350 Score - 3058

OCed
core 480 mem 361 Score - 3601

Respectable scores but had to be OCed. Im kinda disapointed as are most HEL80 users about this underclocked GPU business. Comparable systems are getting 3500 out of the box

I am still pleased with the comp thou as chaz has pointed it out it throws down just fine on new games ( runs FEAR great )

 

Ok, got my new e1705 on Tuesday and was finally able to sit down and play with it today.

Dell Inspiron e1705:

Intel Core Duo T2400 (1.83 GHz)
1GB 533 2DIMM
nVidia 7900GS 256M

3DMark05 stock: 6290
3DMark05 w. LaptopVideo2Go 84.63: 6322

Haven't gotten around to OC'ing it yet, will post once I get that.

 

Hey guys!

Amilo M1437G:

1.73 Ghz Sonoma
1.5 GB DDR2 400 MHz
80 GB 5400 rpm, 8 MB cache
X700 128 MB mobility DDR1 overlcocked to 372:330 (stock:351/297)

2805 3dmark05 points. Stock is 2560.

Charlie

 

Hey i just ran 3D Mark 05 on a Qosmio F30 that has the 7600 128mb and it scored 3700 marks!! That is very high for a 7600 with jst 128mb as iv heard people with the HP 8000 with the 7600 256mb only scoring 3500!... Can anyone take a guess at the reason for this?? I think its coz the Qosmios have great drivers in them (Qosmio Engine) but could be wrong..

 

Could just be luck and the way the systems are set up. Tbh, I dont think Qosmio engine has a thing to do with it, they're usually just slightly tweaked/rebranded manufacturer drivers anyway.

Entire system setup DOES have an effect in 3Dmark, and no one system is the same.

 

I got a 3352 Out of box, stock drivers.

Is this any good?

Anything I can do to up this score besides overclocking?

 

My X1400 scored 1911 points in 3DMark 05 with catalyst 7.2 drivers in Vista Home Premium. I guess it would be slightly higher than that in XP.

 

I'd like to link to a great thread, which is based on this one but unlike this one which got a bit old it has all the current information about recent powerful notebooks:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=99051

 

Great thread man! This will help a lot

I'd be great if u put the G1 in this too, ~1800 and an 05 score of 4989. Thanks. (specs in sigg)