3dMark06 Scores

All Default settings:

Desktop: 5988
Laptop: 844

 

Core 2 Duo T7400
ATI FireGL 5250
2GB 667 ram

3dmark06 - 1677

 

uhhh. My notebook comes at the end of the week. (specs below)

But from similar systems ive seen on this post, im guessing it will come out to be about 4200-4300 (3Dmark 06')

[*i'll update this when i get the chance to test it]

 

well im waiting for new drivers (ones actually made for it) before i submit my results

 

Hi all long time lurker first time poster Nothing to special about this.

36Mark 06: 428
(CPU score: 301)
Ibuypower Battalion
Athlon 64 x3200+
1gig ram
80gig 7200rpm HD
|1280x800| WXGA
Ati Mobility 9600/9700! (w00! feel the burn!)

I'm trying to decide between the Toshiba satalite with the 7900gs and the ASUS G2 for an upgrade, What do think..? ASUS only boasts an x1600 but it's considerably cheaper.

I don't know what do you all think?

 

I got 2500 something with a go 7600

 

question-I have a mac book pro, 2.33 GHz, 2 gigs, ati x1600 oced to 482/482. I used two different drivers-ATI Catalyst 7.2, and Omega 3.8.330. Using the ATIs, I got 2143, however, it ran with less than the standard res. instead of 12xx by 800, it was 12xx by 7xx (don't remember exactly ) with the omegas, it got 2079, but with full resolution. so my question (finally) is which drivers I should use. also, I was wondering if these results are typical, or if I'm running slower than I should be.

w/ATI drivers
SM 2.0 670
SM 3.0 885
CPU 2033

 

3DMark06 score: 3056

ATI catalyst 7.2 and cpu + gfx are running stock speeds.

 

T7400
1GB RAM
X1400

I received 1106 3D marks using ATI Catalyst 7.2 and GPU @ 515/445

 

How the heck did you do that?

I have more ram and a better cpu and i got 3485.....

edit:

2nd time got 3530 after enabling all tests.


but still how did you score over 200 more?

nevermind figured it out you set your card to high performance not high quality

 

Thats well within the tests margin of error. Plus driver differences may cause it.

 

I got 4545 with an Nvidia GeForce 7900 gs 256mb. Laptop specs in my sig. Is this score any good?

 

Horrible, horrible score. Sell your laptop immediatly. It may explode.. No, really: http://www.gotwavs.com/0028375953/WAVS/Movies/Bruce_Almighty/itsgood.wav

 

Don't kid yourself, you know its real good... you overclocked to get it that high . And please dont say you didnt. I know what a 7900gs can handle, and thats an overclock. Congrats though, its a good score no matter how you got it.

 

G1's Vidia 7700 (OC'd) gets a 2600 (ish) [AT 1680x1050]

I dont remember the exact one...i went by 05 marks. (rig specs in siggh)

 

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/resultanalyzer.jsp?projectType=14&XLID=0&UID=8873379
5485 3dMark06

Killernotebook Executioner
T7400 cpu
7950 GTX
PC-5300 2 gigs ram

 

Do you have a screen? I have a Core 2 Duo desktop at 2.6Ghz, 2Gb Ram and an X1800XT - and I can only get 4,700 on 3dmark06, even though this machine is incomparably better then your laptop...

When I had a Desktop 7900gs, much more powerful then the Go version even if overclocked, I only got 4,200....

 

the notebook 7900gs CAN reach those scores i've seen a lot of those 3dmark06 images arround the 4500 points with that 'go 7900gs'.

 

integrated ATI 1150.. 208 with AcerFerrari 1003.. lolz!!

 

I got 3603 with my Inspiron 9400 T5600 (1.83), 2 GB 553Mhz, 160 GB HDD (5400), 7900 GS

Since my previous laptop was a Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook with an integrated card I have to admit that I'm still fairly new at this and I'd like to ask whether this is a good score or not. I'm running Vista Home Basic btw.

 

3D Mark 05: 3793

 

The accuracy of actually testing a systems abilities by 3dmark is very much in question. Granted all benchmarks are just that, only "benchmarks" and can only simulate real world performance at best. However, 3dmark has been getting worse with each new generation, to the point that it should really be more of a burn-in test and a very rough idea of the actual performance of the system being tested.

 

Holy crap, I wish my new laptop (Compal IFL90, pre-ordered) was here already... My aging desktop athlon-xp 2000 cpu, 1.5gb ram, ati radeon 9800 gives me:

3DMark Score 346 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 163 Marks
SM 3.0 Score N/A
CPU Score 540 Marks

Detailed Test Results

Graphics Tests
1 - Return to Proxycon 1.368 FPS
2 - Firefly Forest 1.349 FPS

CPU Tests
CPU1 - Red Valley 0.173 FPS
CPU2 - Red Valley 0.27 FPS

 

See sig for score~

 

is that score at stock clocks?

 

I gotta 2042 score, is that good or bad. (remember the clock settings)

 

2000 3dmark06 points is very nice for an X1400! Actually very close to a 7600Go!

 

3dMark06 Scores for my 2 laptops ...

MacBook Pro, Windows XP/Bootcamp 1.3, 8600M ("overclocked" ... to factory defaults of 475/700), 1280x1024 - 4050.
Dell XPS Gen 2, Windows XP, GeForce Go 7600 Ultra, 1280x1024 - 1018.

Guess which one is gathering dust? *grin*

 

~5600 3DMark 06
XPS M1710
7900gs
2 gigs 667 ram

I'm at work but I'll post a link to the 3dmark page later. My card is at a very high, but stable overclock (I believe its at 580/790, but I'll double check later). I might push it even more tonight just to see what I get .

 

My FZ... M8400 GT

3Dmark 05 : 4249
3Dmark 06 : 2510

 

Wow im amazed. OC'ing must really help

 

lo. i got a problem.

i used to have Core DUo T2400 , 1GB DDr2 and 7600GO . it did ~1660p in 3dmark06 and CPU score was ~1500p.

now i upgraded it to T7400 . 3dmark06 score droper by 100 to 1560p and CPU score went to 900p. :S

every driver , patch and bios is latest version. NHC and powermizer running at max performance . everything the same as before but it just seems that one core is not running :S

tho when i open wprime or UT3demo , both cores goes to 100% ...


anyone else has this problem?

what i can do ?

 

Toshiba X200-15K 8700M GT clock core/shader/memory ; 770/1840/970
Got 6161... Nice eh?

 

I just finished running two 3dmark06 tests on my Lenovo Thinkpad T61p (specs below).

The first test, with 169.04 drivers on standard settings got me 3533.

The second result, with 169.04 drivers on max settings got me 3944.

Not bad for a Quadro FX570m, eh?

 

How high would you recon I would be able to OC these babies without damaging them=

 

ASUS C90s (In Sig)

Overclocked GPU @ 515, 490
CPU in overclocking mode @ 2.50ghz

3DMark06 Score: 4713
Picture: http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2329/picjb4.png

 

D3mon you need to set the resolution to 1280x1024.

 

3DMark06= 3679
3DMark05= 5775
3DMark03= 11,764

 

EDIT: Huge image is pretty obnoxious. I got 4502 on Basic settings, OC of 550/800 with max temp of 87.

Eh, I wish I could do better.

17" and 8600M GT with ample ventilation in a cold room should be pushing higher clocks than that.

 

Area-51® m5550
Intel® Core™ 2 Duo Processor T7200 2.0GHz 4MB Cache 667MHz FSB
256MB NVidia® GeForce™ Go 7600
2GB Dual Channel DDR2 SO-DIMM at 667MHz - 2 x 1024MB
80GB SATA 1.5Gb/s 7,200RPM 8MB Cache
Windows Vista Home Premium 32bit (Clean Install)

3Dmark06-1739
CPU Score-1690
SM 2.0-708
SM 3.0-552

I Guess those are my scores,...Not happy with the results but i was able to play Crysis on medium settings...just wished theres was an upgrade for my 3d card like maybe an 7950 512mb but for under $500. ok i'm getting off the topic those are my scores...

 

i just o/c and tried again and this time i got better results 2162
and cpu 1792 it looks better than before but i'm new at this o/c thing what
are the con sequenses? i overclocked it from 450/350 to 510/410,...is this safe?

 

normal on 169.04 driver - around 3100 (temp=45~40C)
oced on 169.04 driver to 550/450 - around 3900 (temp=45~55C):O!!
should i overclock more?? but when i ran the show artifacts on the ati tools at 600. i could notice some poping on it...

 

Vostro1500 2gig RAM, 8600GT , Core 2 Duo 7300
3DMark 06 score of 3269

 

asus g1s - 2 gb ram, 8600gt, core 2 duo t7300

3dmark06 ~ 3900+ (i think it was 3916)

169.04 driver - no overclocking

EDIT - ~3700+ with the standard asus driver

 

Asus G1S-A1 (I think it's the A1 at least - Core 2 Duo T7500, this European version got some strange character string attached instead of "A1").

169.09 drivers, no overclocking.

3DMark 06 score: 3965

 

X205-S9359 o/c 5050 (3dmark06) at 1280x1024 (3dmark05 10100)
X205-SLI1 o/c 7650 (3dmark06) at 1280x800 (3dmark05 11100)

As you can see, at lower(same) res(3dmark05) there isn't much of a difference between the 8600gt sli and the single 8700.

Used latest rivatuner and 169.04 drivers on both.

16 Feb 08 update: Sager NP9262, 3DMark06, 10,340 3dmarks, Win XP 167.46, otherwise stock out of the crate performance with Q6600, 4gb Ram, 8800GTX, no O/C.

 

Hp Nx8220
Pentium M 1.83ghz
ATI x600 (64mb???)

3dmark06 - 38

 

Toshiba satellite a200-1m8
ati 2600m t7100
oc - 4098 3dmark06

 

hahah thats so funny

 

Hi.

It`s not fair comparing vista and xp benchmarks

Xp is going to have higher scores every time!

regards

John.