with the 660M being incompatible in the HM series (thx to mythlogic for testing that), i dont see a bright 680M future for my machine.... thx for nothing clevo!![]()
-
-
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
i guess Clevo want you guys to get new laptops every year
-
Lets be honest here also, if AMD was incapable of producing a quality product they would not be able to last in this market. There is SO much scrutiny over performance and function that anything less than a stellar product is immediately eviscerated by reviews. -
-
Only 2 more days
I`m also interested in seeing any news about new notebooks at computex -
jaybee, that sucks big time bro, but there maybe some bios update in near future maybe? sorry to hear that
-
-
Whats that HM series? I dont see HM series in clevo list. -
Kingpinzero ROUND ONE,FIGHT! You Win!
-
And here is the big reveal! :drum roll:
ASUS, NVIDIA Unveil Worldâs First Windows RT Consumer Device « NVIDIA
I kid. I kid -
so... asus started making crappy laptops because they were busy making crappy tablets...
bdw 100 milliin estimated?..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2 -
Speedy Gonzalez Xtreme Notebook Speeder!
that tablet looks good to bad is going to be annihilated by apple IOS based tablet -
Not crappy laptops, just overpriced and not really catering to enthusiasts anymore. Asus is focused on the lowest denominator. They don't care about the enthusiasts and reseller as much anymore, they want huge sales at NewEgg, Amazon, TigerDirect and BestBuy. It's just a different targeted audience.
People who are shopping for laptops on Amazon, TigerDirect, NewEgg or BestBuy won't have a clue what a Clevo/Sager is and Alienware would be well beyond their budget. Asus pretty much has that target crowd to themselves, so business wise, it was a smart move.
-
Just an FYI
Maximum PC | Origin PC Crams Kepler Based GeForce GTX 680M GPU into EON15-S, EON17-S Gaming Laptops
GTX 680M. Based on Nvidia's Kepler architecture, the GeForce GTX 680M is a high-octane GPU with 1344 CUDA cores, 4GB of GDDR5 graphics memory, and full support for Nvidia's battery-friendly Optimus technology. -
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
680M specs they list.
Core Clock
720MHz
Cuda Cores 1344
Memory Clock 1800MHz
Memory Size 4GB
Memory Interface 256-bit
Memory Type GDDR5
Direct X support DX 11
MXM Support Yes, MXM 3.0, type B
Cooling Dedicated Cooling System
NVIDIA PhysX support Yes
Don't even bother touching the core clock until you get that memory clock much higher, 900mhz is nothing for a card of this power.
Also does that clock include turbo? Is there any room for turbo above that anyway?
Could be a potent overclocker. -
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
4GB GDDR5, NVIDIA GTX 6x0M; 768 CUDA 256BIT, N13E-GTX (GK104) Kepler (28nm); MXM 3.0b;100W
-
Can we have the traditional Meaker performance prediction...
-
Mem clock of 1800
GDDR5. Thats 7200mhz effective lol. Thats not possible unless its some new type of GDDR5 chips on them.
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Nvidia cards usually get listed as DDR.
So 1800 = real 900 = data 3600.
With the core clocks reduced i'd say 25-30% slower than the 670 (which turbos up to over 1ghz regularly) but with such a slap to the memory clock (1.5ghz to 900mhz) I'd say 65-70% of the performance of the 670. But it could be really game dependant and I am not very confident with that prediction.
Hopefully the mem will clock if that's the config otherwise you will be so bandwidth starved. -
Nice.
Why would they put such slow RAM compared with the competition? -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Power consumption, just like the 480m.
That or the imc got hit hard by the voltage reduction. -
probably to reduce heat and thus have more head room for additional cuda cores and core clock?
Sent from my GT-I9001 using Tapatalk 2 -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
One thing to watchbis 3dmark 11 p runs being pointless due to the low resolutions. Game perfomance at 1080p would be lower due to restricted bandwidth.
The type of memory fitted could be SUPER important. -
This is turning out to be interesting.
-
So basically a severely dowclocked 4GB GTX 670...I can live with that! Bring on overvolting! Although I would have thought they would be using MXM 3.1 which supports PCIe 3.0 like the 7970m.
-
WHO said that it was impossible and no way it could happen? 99% of you guys.
The signs was there all along. 670 use less power than 560 TI which the 580M was based on. A downclocked 670 can be around 15% faster than 7970M I think
-
"As a refresher, all of Kepler's GPUs make use of a new GPU Boost feature, which automatically increases the clock speed if the GPU isn't already taxed." -
So it running at 720MHz means that it 26%ish slower than GTX 670?
-
And a big whopping "I told you so" to all you AMD fanboys who said that nothing could ever beat Pitcairn or the 7970M.
Performance over 7970M:
(16%+18%+20%+19%+26%+17%+16%+8%)/8 = 17.5%
GTX is around 18% faster than 7970M
It is freaking 80% (!!!) faster than GTX 580M
Watch that language! -
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
Interesting...so there is momentum that it's 1344 kepler cores. I take my hat off to nvidia if they pull this off
-
Dude wait these are just some pictures
I think that the GTX680M is gonne be relly nice but 18% faster as the 7970m i cant believe that so far ^^
Lets see what the future brings with it -
@Cloudfire I guess you can say that you were correct
downclocked GTX 670 it is. I'm pleased as well, time to get me one of these...
-
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
you are right, time will tell -
The GDDR5 is not running at 3600MHz. That is wrong since it have a memory bandwidth of 115.2GB/s
Now the question that remains is that if we can overclock this baby up to GTX 670 performance. (Not that I have any need for it though) -
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
-
-
-
Notebook Reviews - Laptop Reviews and Netbook News Picture
Nvidia now trolling there old 580m/675m's lol.
7970m vs 680m
http://www.notebookreview.com/shared/picture.asp?f=65230 -
Know your math. 900 MHz memory frequency corresponds perfectly to 115.2GB/s -
Origin lists it as 1800Mhz, which GPU-z will list as 900Mhz. I am running the same memory clocks in my 580m 1800Mhz as reported by Inspector and 900Mhz as reported by GPU-z, and have 115.2GBit/s bandwidth.
-
ummm yeah... it says right there 1800 mhz mem clock which translates to 900 mhz real clock ^^
edit: ah crap, widezu ninja'd me
Sent from my GT-I9001 using Tapatalk 2 -
-
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
ok, simple math using this formula:
bandwidth = Memory interface / 8 * memory clock * 2
256bit / 8 * mem_clock * 2 = 115.2 gb/s
mem_clock=1800mhz
which means the memory IS running 900mhz...so 3.6ghz effective...which is very low by today's standards -
@Cloudfire, the GDDR5 speed is 900Mhz, that's an effective clock rate of 3600Mhz which is 115.2GBit/s bandwidth.
-
-
-
And I have the m17x with 7970 otw.. I guess it's time to cancle order and wait for the new beast to enter the arena.
AMD 7970m vs GTX 680m
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by x32993x, Apr 20, 2012.