The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous pageNext page →

    AMD 7970m vs GTX 680m

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by x32993x, Apr 20, 2012.

  1. jaybee83

    jaybee83 Biotech-Doc

    Reputations:
    4,125
    Messages:
    11,571
    Likes Received:
    9,149
    Trophy Points:
    931
    with the 660M being incompatible in the HM series (thx to mythlogic for testing that), i dont see a bright 680M future for my machine.... thx for nothing clevo! :mad:
     
  2. w3ak3stl1nk

    w3ak3stl1nk Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    3
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Ouch, that's an eye opener.
     
  3. SlickDude80

    SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    3,262
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    106
    that's terrible dude! :mad: i guess Clevo want you guys to get new laptops every year :(
     
  4. Vahlen

    Vahlen Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    243
    Messages:
    323
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I had an Nvidia GT8600, it will most likely be the last Nvidia product I own IF I can help it. Any company that knowingly releases a faulty product without intentions of informing it's consumers or attempting a fix is a company not worthy of my money.

    Lets be honest here also, if AMD was incapable of producing a quality product they would not be able to last in this market. There is SO much scrutiny over performance and function that anything less than a stellar product is immediately eviscerated by reviews.
     
  5. jaybee83

    jaybee83 Biotech-Doc

    Reputations:
    4,125
    Messages:
    11,571
    Likes Received:
    9,149
    Trophy Points:
    931
    yeah, really sucks... actually wanted to keep this machine for another 2-3 years. but now ill probably swap to a haswell laptop next year... and take a reaaaal good and long look at the AW, MSI, Asus and Samsung competition this time :mad: :rolleyes:
     
  6. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Only 2 more days :D
    I`m also interested in seeing any news about new notebooks at computex :)
     
  7. maxheap

    maxheap caparison horus :)

    Reputations:
    1,244
    Messages:
    3,294
    Likes Received:
    191
    Trophy Points:
    131
    jaybee, that sucks big time bro, but there maybe some bios update in near future maybe? sorry to hear that :(
     
  8. Frost451

    Frost451 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    I couldn't agree more, the reason that you see alot of people with AMD cards is because its the only viable option at this time. Were not going to pay more for 675M to get half the performance at stock clocks, that just makes no sense. I prefer Nvidia because of their UI and their drivers have always been good to me. But I could not see paying $150 more for 675M. I run a GTX 580 in my desktop and very happy with it. But as of now I'm also very happy with my 7970m in my laptop. The only reason that I would upgrade to a 680m would be if I started having major issues with the 7970m. As of now I can play all the games I want to on it at very good frame rates. No crashing or issues, battlefield 3, crysis, shift 2, etc all run great.
     
  9. Supranium

    Supranium Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    80
    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30


    Whats that HM series? I dont see HM series in clevo list. :confused:
     
  10. Kingpinzero

    Kingpinzero ROUND ONE,FIGHT! You Win!

    Reputations:
    1,439
    Messages:
    2,332
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    55
    You meant ER mate, our HM uses Mxm slot, not a gpu soldered.
     
  11. long2905

    long2905 Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    2,443
    Messages:
    2,314
    Likes Received:
    114
    Trophy Points:
    81
  12. burnie22

    burnie22 Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    so... asus started making crappy laptops because they were busy making crappy tablets... :D
    bdw 100 milliin estimated?.. :confused:
    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
     
  13. Speedy Gonzalez

    Speedy Gonzalez Xtreme Notebook Speeder!

    Reputations:
    5,447
    Messages:
    3,143
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Asus don't make crappy Laptops the only bad decision was putting a gtx470M on the G75

    that tablet looks good to bad is going to be annihilated by apple IOS based tablet :D
     
  14. Zymphad

    Zymphad Zymphad

    Reputations:
    2,321
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    355
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Not crappy laptops, just overpriced and not really catering to enthusiasts anymore. Asus is focused on the lowest denominator. They don't care about the enthusiasts and reseller as much anymore, they want huge sales at NewEgg, Amazon, TigerDirect and BestBuy. It's just a different targeted audience.

    People who are shopping for laptops on Amazon, TigerDirect, NewEgg or BestBuy won't have a clue what a Clevo/Sager is and Alienware would be well beyond their budget. Asus pretty much has that target crowd to themselves, so business wise, it was a smart move.

     
  15. Zymphad

    Zymphad Zymphad

    Reputations:
    2,321
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    355
    Trophy Points:
    151
  16. basilios01

    basilios01 Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    114
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
  17. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,436
    Messages:
    58,194
    Likes Received:
    17,902
    Trophy Points:
    931
    680M specs they list.
    Core Clock
    720MHz
    Cuda Cores 1344
    Memory Clock 1800MHz
    Memory Size 4GB
    Memory Interface 256-bit
    Memory Type GDDR5
    Direct X support DX 11
    MXM Support Yes, MXM 3.0, type B
    Cooling Dedicated Cooling System
    NVIDIA PhysX support Yes

    Don't even bother touching the core clock until you get that memory clock much higher, 900mhz is nothing for a card of this power.

    Also does that clock include turbo? Is there any room for turbo above that anyway?

    Could be a potent overclocker.
     
  18. SlickDude80

    SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    3,262
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    106
    interesting...this is what is listed at Eurocom:

    4GB GDDR5, NVIDIA GTX 6x0M; 768 CUDA 256BIT, N13E-GTX (GK104) Kepler (28nm); MXM 3.0b;100W

    The HM series was last yr's model. It was just recently replaced with the EM series. So people that bought these laptops as late as a few months ago are a little mad that they can't update to modern vid cards
     
  19. iaTa

    iaTa Do Not Feed

    Reputations:
    1,328
    Messages:
    2,675
    Likes Received:
    197
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Can we have the traditional Meaker performance prediction...
     
  20. Supranium

    Supranium Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    80
    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Mem clock of 1800 :eek: GDDR5. Thats 7200mhz effective lol. Thats not possible unless its some new type of GDDR5 chips on them.
     
  21. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,436
    Messages:
    58,194
    Likes Received:
    17,902
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Nvidia cards usually get listed as DDR.

    So 1800 = real 900 = data 3600.

    With the core clocks reduced i'd say 25-30% slower than the 670 (which turbos up to over 1ghz regularly) but with such a slap to the memory clock (1.5ghz to 900mhz) I'd say 65-70% of the performance of the 670. But it could be really game dependant and I am not very confident with that prediction.

    Hopefully the mem will clock if that's the config otherwise you will be so bandwidth starved.
     
  22. iaTa

    iaTa Do Not Feed

    Reputations:
    1,328
    Messages:
    2,675
    Likes Received:
    197
    Trophy Points:
    81
    Nice.

    Why would they put such slow RAM compared with the competition?
     
  23. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,436
    Messages:
    58,194
    Likes Received:
    17,902
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Power consumption, just like the 480m.

    That or the imc got hit hard by the voltage reduction.
     
  24. jaybee83

    jaybee83 Biotech-Doc

    Reputations:
    4,125
    Messages:
    11,571
    Likes Received:
    9,149
    Trophy Points:
    931
    probably to reduce heat and thus have more head room for additional cuda cores and core clock?

    Sent from my GT-I9001 using Tapatalk 2
     
  25. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,436
    Messages:
    58,194
    Likes Received:
    17,902
    Trophy Points:
    931
    One thing to watchbis 3dmark 11 p runs being pointless due to the low resolutions. Game perfomance at 1080p would be lower due to restricted bandwidth.

    The type of memory fitted could be SUPER important.
     
  26. jaug1337

    jaug1337 de_dust2

    Reputations:
    2,135
    Messages:
    4,862
    Likes Received:
    1,031
    Trophy Points:
    231
    This is turning out to be interesting.
     
  27. widezu69

    widezu69 Goodbye Alienware

    Reputations:
    3,079
    Messages:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    168
    Trophy Points:
    131
    So basically a severely dowclocked 4GB GTX 670...I can live with that! Bring on overvolting! Although I would have thought they would be using MXM 3.1 which supports PCIe 3.0 like the 7970m.
     
  28. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    And WHO told you guys that the 680M was a downclocked 670? ME
    WHO said that it was impossible and no way it could happen? 99% of you guys.

    The signs was there all along. 670 use less power than 560 TI which the 580M was based on. A downclocked 670 can be around 15% faster than 7970M I think

    [​IMG]
     
  29. Shizm

    Shizm Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    25
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
  30. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    So it running at 720MHz means that it 26%ish slower than GTX 670?
     
  31. Shizm

    Shizm Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    25
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
  32. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    HAHAHA, so AWESOME :D :D :cool: :cool: :cool:
    And a big whopping "I told you so" to all you AMD fanboys who said that nothing could ever beat Pitcairn or the 7970M.

    Performance over 7970M:
    (16%+18%+20%+19%+26%+17%+16%+8%)/8 = 17.5%

    GTX is around 18% faster than 7970M

    It is freaking 80% (!!!) faster than GTX 580M



    Watch that language!
     
  33. SlickDude80

    SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    3,262
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Interesting...so there is momentum that it's 1344 kepler cores. I take my hat off to nvidia if they pull this off
     
  34. Scherfe

    Scherfe Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Dude wait these are just some pictures ;) I think that the GTX680M is gonne be relly nice but 18% faster as the 7970m i cant believe that so far ^^

    Lets see what the future brings with it ;)
     
  35. widezu69

    widezu69 Goodbye Alienware

    Reputations:
    3,079
    Messages:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    168
    Trophy Points:
    131
    @Cloudfire I guess you can say that you were correct :) downclocked GTX 670 it is. I'm pleased as well, time to get me one of these... :D
     
  36. SlickDude80

    SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    3,262
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    106
    what we aren't taking into account is the severely limited bandwidth (if those posted specs are right...3.6ghz??). If the vram clocks up, then we will see the true power of this card. That number doesn't make sense at all. They are going to put 4gigs of vram in this card, but it is @ 3.6ghz?? weird

    you are right, time will tell
     
  37. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    The GDDR5 is not running at 3600MHz. That is wrong since it have a memory bandwidth of 115.2GB/s

    Yeah, I`m getting me one of these as soon as they are available. With the great Nvidia drivers, the Optimus that works and the way it seems to crush the 7970M, it is a no brainer for $250 premium in my opinion :)
    Now the question that remains is that if we can overclock this baby up to GTX 670 performance. (Not that I have any need for it though) :D
     
  38. SlickDude80

    SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    3,262
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    106
    source? tenchars
     
  39. ichime

    ichime Notebook Elder

    Reputations:
    2,420
    Messages:
    2,676
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    56
    It could be that the 4gb modules run hot, hence the downclocking. If that's true, I think nVidia would be best served going back to 2gb since there are virtually no games that need more than 2gb at 1080p. I think the memory clocks will end up being the same as what they usually have for mobile chips (around 1200mhz/4800mhz effective)
     
  40. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Here you go

    New NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M now available from ORIGIN PC

    There are several resellers that list the 680M with 2GB too. Rabook is one of them
     
  41. nissangtr786

    nissangtr786 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    85
    Messages:
    865
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  42. svl7

    svl7 T|I

    Reputations:
    4,719
    Messages:
    3,758
    Likes Received:
    134
    Trophy Points:
    131

    Know your math. 900 MHz memory frequency corresponds perfectly to 115.2GB/s
     
  43. widezu69

    widezu69 Goodbye Alienware

    Reputations:
    3,079
    Messages:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    168
    Trophy Points:
    131
    Origin lists it as 1800Mhz, which GPU-z will list as 900Mhz. I am running the same memory clocks in my 580m 1800Mhz as reported by Inspector and 900Mhz as reported by GPU-z, and have 115.2GBit/s bandwidth.
     
  44. jaybee83

    jaybee83 Biotech-Doc

    Reputations:
    4,125
    Messages:
    11,571
    Likes Received:
    9,149
    Trophy Points:
    931
    ummm yeah... it says right there 1800 mhz mem clock which translates to 900 mhz real clock ^^

    edit: ah crap, widezu ninja'd me :)

    Sent from my GT-I9001 using Tapatalk 2
     
  45. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    It have an effective memory speed of 1800MHz :)

    I think it is time to post the two pics together and maybe bump them up incase someone haven`t seen them :p




     
  46. SlickDude80

    SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet

    Reputations:
    3,262
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    106
    ok, simple math using this formula:

    bandwidth = Memory interface / 8 * memory clock * 2

    256bit / 8 * mem_clock * 2 = 115.2 gb/s

    mem_clock=1800mhz

    which means the memory IS running 900mhz...so 3.6ghz effective...which is very low by today's standards
     
  47. widezu69

    widezu69 Goodbye Alienware

    Reputations:
    3,079
    Messages:
    4,207
    Likes Received:
    168
    Trophy Points:
    131
    @Cloudfire, the GDDR5 speed is 900Mhz, that's an effective clock rate of 3600Mhz which is 115.2GBit/s bandwidth.
     
  48. dimotion

    dimotion Notebook Guru

    Reputations:
    89
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    16
    I want this card in the M17xr4!!!!
     
  49. Cloudfire

    Cloudfire (Really odd person)

    Reputations:
    7,279
    Messages:
    10,304
    Likes Received:
    2,878
    Trophy Points:
    581
    Oh, ok sorry. Thought you just multiply the memory speed by 2. Now I know :)
     
  50. Shizm

    Shizm Notebook Enthusiast

    Reputations:
    25
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    5
    And I have the m17x with 7970 otw.. I guess it's time to cancle order and wait for the new beast to enter the arena.
     
← Previous pageNext page →