Probably both due to Single player campaigns. But speaking of Multiplayer, no doubt Battlefield 3 wins my heart.![]()
-
I take back what i said about buying MW3
Its look like a MW2 DLC after watching some youtube vids, its like they are not even trying anymore -
I'll be getting both and enjoying both sides of the water.
-
I like the SP Campaigns so I'll try both. I prefer the FOV in COD series than I do with BF series, the guns in BF are so HUGE and cumbersome.
Speaking of MP, I don't see why people rage at COD and love BF considering they are both just spawn and kill, spawn and kill with zero purpose. Disarm the M-Com? Disarm the bomb? Death match? Whatever, dont' care, pointless. -
Well there's Rush, Conquest, Deathmatch. BFBC2 as more spawn and kill, spawn and kill than BF2. The maps in BF series are usually quite large, and allow for vehicles which is a huge bonus over MW games. I felt in MW MP that it was spawn and die every ten seconds. Even in BFBC2 I'd usually last 30!
And in BF2 I could go many minutes without dying.
-
I must say the BF3 beta was a bit of a disappointment for me...origin got overburdened really quickly, the lag reminds me of mw2's match making, and the server browser in an internet browser? WTH!
Only reason I see myself getting mw3 OVER bf3 is if lag, hit detection etc. does not improve... plus I guess I kinda wanna see how mw2 ends
As for multiplayer, staking myself to counter strike global offensive. Still play 1.6 occasionally, be interesting to see if valve can finally balance the weapons. -
bf3 feels like cod to me. Sounds dumb but when i was playing in the tunnels that is what it felt like.
Battlefield 3 or Modern warfare 3? *POLL*
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by blaster, Sep 4, 2011.