The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    Battlefield 3 or Modern warfare 3? *POLL*

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by blaster, Sep 4, 2011.

  1. omarness

    omarness Notebook Geek

    Reputations:
    0
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    15
    Probably both due to Single player campaigns. But speaking of Multiplayer, no doubt Battlefield 3 wins my heart. :D
     
  2. KING19

    KING19 Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    358
    Messages:
    1,170
    Likes Received:
    779
    Trophy Points:
    131
    I take back what i said about buying MW3

    Its look like a MW2 DLC after watching some youtube vids, its like they are not even trying anymore
     
  3. junglebungle

    junglebungle Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    263
    Messages:
    499
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I'll be getting both and enjoying both sides of the water.
     
  4. Zymphad

    Zymphad Zymphad

    Reputations:
    2,321
    Messages:
    4,165
    Likes Received:
    355
    Trophy Points:
    151
    I like the SP Campaigns so I'll try both. I prefer the FOV in COD series than I do with BF series, the guns in BF are so HUGE and cumbersome.

    Speaking of MP, I don't see why people rage at COD and love BF considering they are both just spawn and kill, spawn and kill with zero purpose. Disarm the M-Com? Disarm the bomb? Death match? Whatever, dont' care, pointless.
     
  5. HTWingNut

    HTWingNut Potato

    Reputations:
    21,580
    Messages:
    35,370
    Likes Received:
    9,878
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Well there's Rush, Conquest, Deathmatch. BFBC2 as more spawn and kill, spawn and kill than BF2. The maps in BF series are usually quite large, and allow for vehicles which is a huge bonus over MW games. I felt in MW MP that it was spawn and die every ten seconds. Even in BFBC2 I'd usually last 30! :p And in BF2 I could go many minutes without dying.
     
  6. niharjhatn

    niharjhatn Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    246
    Messages:
    390
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    I must say the BF3 beta was a bit of a disappointment for me...origin got overburdened really quickly, the lag reminds me of mw2's match making, and the server browser in an internet browser? WTH!

    Only reason I see myself getting mw3 OVER bf3 is if lag, hit detection etc. does not improve... plus I guess I kinda wanna see how mw2 ends :)

    As for multiplayer, staking myself to counter strike global offensive. Still play 1.6 occasionally, be interesting to see if valve can finally balance the weapons.
     
  7. tvdang7

    tvdang7 Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    2
    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    bf3 feels like cod to me. Sounds dumb but when i was playing in the tunnels that is what it felt like.
     
← Previous page