Brand-new Nvidia 675MX shows up?

Hi,I'm wondering if you guys heard about this new card?
cause it already has a review from Taiwan

GT60搭載最新NVIDIA GTX675MX顯示卡測試發表
http://www.coolaler.com/showthread.php/295409-%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E9%A6%96%E7%99%BC%EF%BC%8CMSI-GT60%E6%90%AD%E8%BC%89%E6%9C%80%E6%96%B0NVIDIA-GTX675MX%E9%A1%AF%E7%A4%BA%E5%8D%A1%E6%B8%AC%E8%A9%A6%E7%99%BC%E8%A1%A8

Performance:

3DMARK06:23410
3DMARK VANTAGE:19959
3DMARK11 P:4255
Heaven Benchmark3.0 : 1104

--
there are some gaming tests in that link, check it out if you like
and it got amazingly low temperature, seems a very good card ..however the price is the same as 7970m,considering the driver issue and low temp ,still a good choice I guess

 

Hmm? A 675M X?

Is this a kepler card? Because I'm seeing that +135MHz OC limitation found in almost all Kepler based graphics card. Or is it just a regular GTX 675M (580M)?


Can you give us a GPU-Z screenshot and a PCB close up for the card?

 

According to the article ,it is GK104 ,same as 680M,just weaker

 

its also listed on the laptopvideo2go site in the drivers section:

INF v4.116 v4.117 and v4.118 - News - LaptopVideo2Go Forums

the device ID are different from the fermi ones

 

I am intrigued. Perhaps a Kepler bridging point between the 660m and and the 680m?

 

Seems interesting, a kepler based MXM card for the price of a 7970M

How far behind is the 675MX when compared to a 680M?

 

Using the tests from Notebookcheck, I'm seeing
16366 Vantage GPU on the 675mx vs 20723 for the 680m.
3959 3DM11 GPU on the 675mx vs 5918 on the 680m.


NBC has the 7970m at 21406 Vantage GPU and 5542 3DM11 GPU.

Using NBC's scores (NBC is not completely reliable, take the results with a grain of salt, yadda yadda), it looks like a card that performs better than the Fermi 675m but still falls short of the 7970, much less the 680m.

 

It is the successor of the GTX 570M. Looks like Nvidia didn`t want to wait for the 700M series, so they introduced "MX" prefix so that they can close the hole between the GTX 660M and GTX 680M.

My Kepler K4000M have 960 cores, I`m pretty shure this 675MX will have the same amount of cores since Nvidia usually do a Quadro and a Geforce version out of the same amount of cores.. And thats really great news for me since I can now use Geforce drives instead of the Quadro drivers
GTX 675MX is already listed in the Geforce.com drivers section btw.

With 64C max temperature in 3DMark11 and 3DMark06, this will be a great GPU for people looking for a cool GPU. Its about 20-30% faster than GTX 580M but much cooler.

Great find OP. +rep

 

Seems a bit far behind the 680M, and slightly behind the 7970M. But no driver/enduro issues like the 7970M?

 

Nah, its not close to 7970M. Probably around 15-20% difference between them.
But yeah, no graphic switching problems

 

According to the new linux drivers, there's supposed to be a 670mx as well.

 

You`re right R3d.
Asus is out with one soon with 3630QM and GTX 670MX

Asus Notebook G75VX-T4020H / i7 3630QM / 8GB - Online Shop @ diskontcomputer DC# 719961 ::

 

So it seems

NVIDIA Line up

670M < 670MX =(?)= 675M < 675MX < 680M


AMD Lineup

7850M < 7870M < 7950M (?) < 7970M



Maybe?

Curious of how the 670MX and the 675MX will make it into Sager/Alienware systems and the performance results


@Cloud

Is the 3630QM a replacement for the 3610QM?

Like how the 2630QM got replaced by a 2670QM last year?

 

The 670mx/675mx will probably be based on the new GK106 chips I think. Or maybe they'll be even more cut down GK104s (a la the gtx660ti) but I think it'd be weird for Nvidia to put GK106 in desktops only.

 

I suspect the GTX 675MX is the 660Ti and the 670MX is the 660

 

GTX 675MX is a GK104. GTX 670MX I`ve seen mentioned with GK106. So who knows it might be.

There will be 3 new GPUs that is Kepler it seems:

GeForce GT 645M
GeForce GTX 670MX
GeForce GTX 675MX

Nvidia dévoile les GeForce GTX 670MX et 675MX dans les drivers Linux - Nvidia - Cartes graphiques


@Mobius: No 3630QM is not replacing 3610QM. Its a 35W TDP CPU and 3610QM is a 45W TDP CPU.
EDIT: No I'`m wrong. The 3630QM is replacing the 3610QM actually. The 3632QM is 35W. 3630QM is a 45W

 

Mm, so the 3630QM will be replacing the 3612QM (35w TDP according to HT's W110ER article)?

Eh, a GK104? So GTX 660 based?



Having quite a trouble keeping up with new nvidia 6-series cards ._.

Spoiler

 

LOL nice pic. Have no idea. you`re not the only one who are confused by the million of different GPUs out there. guess we will have to wait for a GPU-Z screenshot

Check my edit on my last post btw. 3630QM is replacing 3610QM and both are 45W

 

Ah, so the 3630QM is the replacement for the 3610QM.

I guess same goes with the 3720QM --> 3740QM (meaker has one O: ) 3820QM --> 3840QM?


Any info on the GT 645M? Maybe in the M11x R4?

 

Anyone got a guess on release date for the 675mx?

 

Lol if 670MX supports SLI Alienware/Sager could have 3 nvidia choices ...

 

MSI is said to release their notebook with this GPU in November. So maybe October?

Yeah I could see the GT 645M going inside the M11x. No information about it yet, Notebookcheck have some piece about it but I`m not shure if that is accurate at all. Anyhow, they say its a faster clocked GT 640M and no new GK10x.
NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M - Notebookcheck.net Tech

 

We already have it for upgrade option in market,but there's no any laptop comes with it yet

 

GTX 670M
GTX 670MX
GTX 675M
GTX 675MX
GTX 680M

o__o

Can you buy the ES sample?

 

Interesting but unlike the 570 and 580 it looks like the 675mx wont come close to the 680 when tweaked.

 

..no I can't ,first there's no ES to buy and two ..now I dont have that money ,I dont know how much ES sample would cost,but normal one costs about 17500NT dollars~= $600 US

 

That's more than the 680M ._.

 

680m ES can get below 600 usd where?/

 

It costs $500-550 to upgrade a Clevo from a 660M / 670M to a 680M

 

Oooo I just saw 670M being offered... so 5 configs total.


If AMD's leaked desktop 8870 is correct (meaning the mobile card will come this year) nVIDIA might be forced to release a 690M.

 

AMD 8850= AMD 8950M

AMD 8870= AMD 8970M


GTX 680M + OC= GTX 685M

GTX 780/770 (?) (GK 110)= GTX 690M

This is how I believe it will work

 

Yes, from a 660M. But that doesn't mean the actual cost of the 680M is 500-550$.

 

I know I know

The card-only GTX 680M is around $750-900 now

Strange how an $370 desktop GPU is transported to a smaller PCB and sold "as is" but ends up a whole lot more than the original

 

i think gk 104 full die with higher clocks maybe at 800~850 on the core will be gtx 690m or gtx 685m ie is desktop gtx 680 but it might be gtx 780m also because i dont think AMD will release 8850/8870 desktop cards this year maybe in january they if 8870 s 249 and beats desktop gtx 670 even then we are in for a treat

 

GK110 has about as much chance of making it into a notebook and performing at any reasonable level as I do of winning against Bolt in the 100m.

7 billion transistors + 384bit mem bus............................

680M is on a custom designed PCB (Cost) with a small production run (Cost) and a cherry picked core (cost).

 

Would you mind elaborating on this? I'm assuming you didn't forget to append "m" to the 570, 580, and 680, so I'm curious as to what you're talking about.

 

There wont be an unlocked bios most like.............

 

Maybe you can force overclock it using my Pstate guide? (+135MHz limitations)

 

any word or rumour on release date?

 

I don't know all the details of how he did it, but an NBR member managed to make a vBIOS for me that allowed me a much larger overclock. I'm running a +170 MHz on my Kepler 660m, for example.

I hope he could do the same for the 675mx.

 

god I wish this were out now. I just ordered my NP9150 with the 675m because I was worried about the 7970 and 680 is out of my price range. If this card was available around the same price as the 7970 I would be ALL OVER IT lol

 

while i am happy with my 675m, a bit more power wouldnt hurt!

 

Lol, funny, looks kinda like someone messed up in marketing and they forgot to make the 670m a 665m, the 670m a 675m and the 675mx just 675m.

If by usually you mean the overall nvidia products, then yeah, however for fermi based architectures it seems they intentionally did not make any matching Quadro & Geforce cards except for the Quadro 5000m & 480m I think. But then again fermi was better for quadros, right? So things could be changing back to "usual" (I. E. flashing quadros to geforce).

 

So, you're saying it's possible to flash a Clevo GTX 680M to a K5000M? O____O

 

Yes I believe it is possible, svl7 would know better than I. However, you can't get any of the performance gains you normally get from a quadro card.

 

No its not possible. There are hardware differences between Quadro and Geforce cards now because Nvidia wanted to separate business and gaming GPUs and didn`t want anyone softmodding the Geforce cards to Quadro`s which was possible before. Not to mention that the memory on the Quadro`s are much more advanced and expensive than the memory on the Geforce cards.
Nvidia gotta satisfy the customers that paid 4x the amount of money for the K5000M, when they could have just bought a 680M, flashed it to K5000M and saved a lot of money. Rightfully so too in my opinion

You can however flash a Quadro to a Geforce though. I`m not shure why this goes when there is a hardware difference

 

ECC vRAM maybe?

So the K5000M has an ECC memory profile/compatible chips that can switch to non-ECC mode (680M vBIOS)

But the 680M doesn't have an ECC memory capabilities required by the K5000M vBIOS?

 

I don`t know if the ECC memory is what makes the difference that allows the Quadro to be flashed to Geforce. Sounds like an interesting theory
Its not the only hardware difference that separates the 680M and the K5000M btw. I don`t remember exactly what it is though. There is a guy in this forum who have studied them who said there was some fine lines cut by laser on the Geforce.

 

What's the laser cut for? Damaging the chip so it can't perform at the required K5000M quality level xD lol

 

hmmmmm, I just found the comment. Its from "Prema", he says the Geforce could work with Quadro vbios but without the extra performance you get in professional software with Quadro`s. So its kinda useless to do it. So you`re absolutely right Mobius, Nvidia damaged the Geforce GPUs on purpose. LOL who would have thought