Ignore the first sentence like I did.![]()
-
1280 x 800 is rather small on a 15.4" I was using 1680 x 1050 on a 15.4" for about 4 years, before switching to a 1440 x 900 on a 17", followed a few months later by a 1920 x 1200 on a 17". I enjoyed all three of these resolutions and now I'm on 1280 x 800 on a 14".
Depending on your uses, 1440 x 900 on a 15.4" could be adequate. I was actually reasonably pleased with 1440 x 900 on my 17", though that resolution sounds rather low in retrospect. I found the 1920 x 1200 to be highly detailed, but a little too small to read. While I am aware that you can always change the size of the icons or tax, it is somewhat cumbersome to have to switch whenever the website or document you are viewing changes in font size/type. -
-
Can't wait to see were else this GPU lands, the K series is very,very nice but a little out of my price range, heres hoping these cards land in a 13" ultraportable.
-
-
Hope you can add a 4860 in it
-
-
I find 1280*800 to be wayyyy enough for a 15,4" you bunch of nit-pickers ;-)
-
-
-
Goodbye nVidia marketshare in Laptop GPU's - NEW ATI 40nm chips announced!
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by DeRail, Mar 3, 2009.