This laptop truly is a BEAST! I can testify. I did pay a little more thoughAs far as the new cards go I'm not too worried about it - every bit of this is user-upgradable if power is permitting. And we know there's always a way around just about anything.
With the Dual 560's on this Intel chip games are "blasting away"!!!![]()
-
-
It would be nice if people would actually discuss about the GTX 660m.
-
it would be nice if there was gtx 660m to discuss, i guess we will just have to wait a few hours.
-
sooo i just kinda spent a good amount of time reading through all the posts...and i got nothing out of it. if the gt 640m is around gt 555m i would expect the gt 650m to be faster.. guess not...
-
does anyone know if intel graphic cores are more powerful than nvidia or amd cores
-
Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!
-
after some searching i found that each of the hd 4000s 16 eu(execution units) is similar to one amd vliw unit, which contains 5 streaming cores or whatever. so the hd 4000 would be equivalent to a 6620g. although intel has pretty bad drivers so im not sure if thats accurate.
-
Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!
similar regarding what power? the arch is way different.
and yes the intel drivers have improved, the latest drivers for the hd3000 are quite ok -
Some early 3DMark scores from notebookcheck...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M - Notebookcheck.net Tech -
bump... the 660m is out... now what?
-
Eh i can vouch that its a decent gpu, in the asus G75vw it never goes above the 30's while idling/browsing, even with the intel hd4000 perma disabled. While gaming its usually in the 40's, maybe it will hit 50 or so under max load so far from what i've seen, which is rather impressive. Performance leaves a bit to be desired, but it should suffice for most. Overclocking it is not that easy though, and nvidia hasn't updated their system tools to support it. Msi Afterburner supposedly can help, but the automatic turbo boost introduced with kepler seems to be more of a roadblock than helpful for people who want/need to manually overclock..
-
Its unclear if there would be an ungimped 192 bit version or not. If yes, would it be much better?
-
If you`re looking for a midrange GPU its not a bad choice.
Compare it with GTX 560M, its a pretty good scoop.
Its about 20-25W less but about 30% better performance
No wonder it runs cool -
Yeh i've sadly been pretty busy this past week so can't keep up with all the new threads and many of the old threads that dissect all the new technology, but the purported 75w its labelled at is likely inaccurate. Even if somehow it was 75w it certainly doesn't feel like it, and its been outrageously cool. Here is a picture showcasing the temps while playing an ultra demanding game on the PCSX2 emulator called Gran Turismo 3
Nonetheless its very unlikely that a 192bit version of it or even a 256bit version (presumably the imaginary gtx 680m) of it would hold a candle to the brute unparalleled power of the 7970m. Even if Nvidia bumped up the clocks outrageously to avoid their 4600 scoring catastrophe, it will likely be scorching hot, well over 100 tdp and prone to throttling as per the norm, extremely limited overclockability, and brutally expensive. No doubt the 7970m has already won the crown this year regardless of what Nvidia eeks out eventually, and as such its the most desirable Gpu on the planet. -
Hold on here, the 660m is not designed to compete with the likes of 7970m.
The 680m will be built on a more robust GPU with more cores. (likely the 660Ti desktop or 670 Desktop)
A 192-bit or 256-bit memory interface is not really needed as its overkill for this range of GPU. Keep in mind, the 660m has more memory bandwidth than a 192-bit 560m due to faster GDDR5. -
NissanGTR used to bet his life it would. Weird he vanished from these topics. I guess he already thinks it is old tech.
-
I think we can fairly conclude he was not being realistic.
-
some gaming fps from the GPU available:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M - Notebookcheck.net Tech -
Hi guys,
I'm sorry if this has been answered but the search function wasn't working and to be honest, I just couldn't sift through 37 pages to see if it had been, so I hope you'll forgive me if it has.
I've been looking at getting the Clevo 151EM with a GTX 660M recently, but I've run into something that confuses me. I've looked at a bunch of resellers and I've seen the 660M offered with 1.0GB GDDR5 (logicalblueone - Australia), 1.5GB GDDR5 (malibal) and 2.0GB (xotic on an ASUS). Now I'm not very computer saavy but from looking around the forums and online, it would seem that more is better in this case? But I haven't been able to find any info on it online about there being 3 different 660Ms, so I'm not really sure what's going on.
So my question is, are there 3 different 660Ms out there and if there are, would it mean getting the one with the 2.0GB of Video memory (I think that's what it stands for?) offers the best performance?
Thanks everyone and I realize that this card's only been available for a short period of time so if this info hasn't been released yet that's cool. I just thought I'd ask here as I was confident I'd get an answer either way. -
I just stopped by lenovo and had this conversation with tech:
Is lenovo gunning for Alienware or what? -
-
^ and you believe it ?
Sent from my wholly molly new iPad using Tapatalk -
-
-
I need to find a decent laptop, under $1000, with a 15 inch screen that has the 660m.
Any ideas? -
Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!
why it needs to be the 660m? you can get the 670m for around 900, check the force 16f3 or the 16f2
-
-
hey guys,
Is it worthwhile to upgrade my GX640 to 660m?
i know performance ranges up to 6970m/7870m/570m
but anyone have prove on heat, performance, power usage? -
How much does the GTX 660M cost? Seems way more efficient to go for the 7970M.
-
-
SoundOf1HandClapping Was once a Forge
To owners of the GTX 660M, does it do that turbo thing while running benchmarks, like, say, Vantage? I'm trying to see if those scores on NotebookCheck are with the turbo or without. I'm guessing with, but just checking.
-
My score is 2623... I don't really know about any turbo features being active or not though.
-
SoundOf1HandClapping Was once a Forge
Run a benchmark while also running something like MSI Afterburner. Enable On-screen Disaply so you can see what clocks you're using.
-
So upgrading to a GTX 660m is not worth it as I have come to understand from this thread. So I'm better off with a 675m right?
-
-
well the 660 comes in mxm 3.0b the 650 doesnt. and the 660m has better cooling, and higher voltage.
-
SoundOf1HandClapping Was once a Forge
Cooling depends on the laptop itself. From what I can see the MSI GE60 uses the same heatsinks for both cards.
-
Does this mean the stock 660M can pull 1100MHz+ with stock voltage overclocked?
Moreover if it's overvolted with a BIOS mod, anyone thinking 1150MHz+? -
Wat
Haven't been active recently why is Cloudfire banned?
Someone on this forum managed 1000MHz on the 650M WITHOUT artifactscan't find the post thought
-
You can find a 650M 1020MHz+ on the apple/mac os forum "retina MBP bootcamp overclocking"
But how many FPS can this overclocked 660M pull on 2033 and 3dmark vantage/11? -
-
My sig 3dm11 run clock speed is also 100% stable for gaming. Played hours of bf3 and skyrim with it.
GPU/DDR (970)1085/1060 wiht stock vbios. Im sure that GPU would clock even higher. I just ran out of slider in AB.
-
-
You have GDDR5 on your GTX660, while im stuck with DDR3. With a same OC, you still get better results due more memory bandwith.
-
Those are my results of OC from diffrent thread, if someone is interesed :
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i5-3210M Processor,LENOVO Product Name score: P3041 3DMarks - 1230 MHz Core, 1400(2800) MHz Memory Clock -
-
660M seems to be the nearly perfect sweetspot for mid-range gaming. They ought to have made it 192bit GDDR5 though.
-
Lol? Where did i say anything different?
Gtx 660m
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Oats04, Jan 11, 2012.