The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    New Nvidia RTX 2080 and 2080 TI OFFICIALLY ANNOUNCED + Preorder

    Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by GizmoSlip, Aug 20, 2018.

  1. wtferrell

    wtferrell Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    304
    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    31
    I just got my 2080ti fe yesterday. Installed, getting ready to put it through its paces
     
    long2905 and hmscott like this.
  2. jaug1337

    jaug1337 de_dust2

    Reputations:
    2,135
    Messages:
    4,862
    Likes Received:
    1,031
    Trophy Points:
    231
    nvidia has so much market share they quit innovating, and starting releasing dozins of cards less gimped each time to sell more. Anything but the top tier is gimped.. it is crazy

    They can do this because AMD hasn't caught up yet
     
    hmscott likes this.
  3. Joikansai

    Joikansai Notebook Deity

    Reputations:
    254
    Messages:
    1,663
    Likes Received:
    704
    Trophy Points:
    131
    On top of that I’m sitting here with my rtx waiting everyday to be able to see rtx on off o_O damn nvidia just release some software for user benchmarks who cares the games if I can benchmark every day :biglaugh:
     
    jaug1337 and hmscott like this.
  4. saturnotaku

    saturnotaku Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,879
    Messages:
    8,926
    Likes Received:
    4,707
    Trophy Points:
    431
  5. saturnotaku

    saturnotaku Notebook Nobel Laureate

    Reputations:
    4,879
    Messages:
    8,926
    Likes Received:
    4,707
    Trophy Points:
    431
    Well, this isn't good.

     
    hmscott, Papusan and jaug1337 like this.
  6. Ryan Russ

    Ryan Russ Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    41
    It's in my opinion much bigger than that. When I was a boy, the voodoo 3dfx (which Nvidia later acquired) did similar steps during the time they had, innovating the detail and lighting, and essentially creating the first modern GPU by forcing Nvidia to innovate.

    RTX, in my opinion, is a step up and the fact that the dlss cores are there adds to some serious potential. The DLSS cores are 1/4th the die, but are underutilized by most games. I think Nvidia is waiting to release a "DLSS core boost" tech. While the majority of the people look at the RTX for performance alone, Turing is a side-step in a much larger picture. By introducing these cards now, they're playing the long game with technology that their competition hasn't explored, much like 3dfx in the older days focusing on actual 3d graphics instead of vector based scalar effects. Ray tracing, especially like the kind NVidia is offering currently, changes the game. Now you can get realistic lighting effects and even expanded scattering without a huge performance hit. Not talking about the 30 fps it might take now, but the drop from 60fps to .2 fps that it used to do with any type of Ray tracing.

    Remember Crysis and it's siblings? The game changed the scene entirely because of not only it's graphics, but a realisitic lighting effect system in addition to those dx10 changes. It was brutal on the GPU side, but today it is somewhat still beautiful in comparison to modern titles although more antiquated in tesselation and structure. RTX seems to be geared to do the same thing with GPU tech.
     
  7. yrekabakery

    yrekabakery Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,470
    Messages:
    3,438
    Likes Received:
    3,688
    Trophy Points:
    331
    Crysis 1 was a DX9 game with a tacked-on DX10 path that looked the same but ran worse.
     
  8. Ryan Russ

    Ryan Russ Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    34
    Messages:
    152
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    41
    That simply wasn't the case. Between developer dx9 and dx10 there were enough changes to warrant the use of dx10. The dx9 hack that they pushed back in the day played around with settings but made things perform much worse than simple dx10. Back in the day you'd see a difference of 3-4 fps for the dx9 to 10 jump but if you forced the settings that made it "look" like dx10 you lost probably 10-20. The reason is because dx10 was more effective at managing the same settings you could force in dx9.
     
  9. yrekabakery

    yrekabakery Notebook Virtuoso

    Reputations:
    1,470
    Messages:
    3,438
    Likes Received:
    3,688
    Trophy Points:
    331
    http://www.tweakguides.com/Crysis_13.html
     
← Previous page