Post your benchmarks!

Windows 7 64 Bit Build 7100, i can also run Windows Vista 32 bit for you too, just tell me if you want hehe

 

1 gig
4 gigs system memory
vista 32 bit
and the rest is in my sig.

and that 64 fps is single card...almost all the test are single card, except one or two 1920x1200 test i ran...on for dondadah and the one up top. the i ran a 1680x1050 for kicks.

im going to fill out your benchmark form with stock/oc/single/sli
i see you have the 249/141/162 in the wrong spot..they should be in the high spot...

 

Having a high clocked desktop quad helps out at those low settings. What do you get with 2 cores (medium 1024 x 768)

 

a little secret for ya.....

they WERE ran in dual core mode...
most of my stuff is ran in dual core mode to prove a point that more cores are not always better..when gaming is concerned... encoding is something entirely different.

What do you get with 2 cores (medium 1024 x 768) <--- which game?

 

Crysis, and you sure about that? Well, it is only 6 frames. I'm probably underestimating what difference 333x2 mhz will make with the GPU bottlenecking...

 

100 percent sure
the part your under estimating (and we had this talk already) was you over clocking your cpu...
if i could over clock my cpu...i would be quite a bit higher than i am now...
this is why the 4870's/4850's are beating you...because you can't seem to get your cpu over clocked... once you do that...then you have a chance at taking that title....no over clocking or no high end cpu...no chance...

not to mention tester with a 4850 doing 6400 gpu points with a p9500
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showpost.php?p=4838990&postcount=2120

 

i didn't forget to run the benchmark but i don't have aa as an option. i think i haveto reinstall my gpu driver.
http://i42.tinypic.com/2aksoy.jpg

 

really? no AA as a option huh? did you check you ccc?

 

i don't have ccc installed. i don't use that.

maybe i should. i will install it because i have in on my desktop.

 

im guessing here...i thought that was part of your control panel

 

no i am confused. Lol. i mess with my drivers and i guess messed up aa some how so i will reinstall my drivers and see what's up.

 

just ran it again...it's 66 fps 1024x768@medium stock clocks of 500/799/1250

 

ok for crysis do you want me to run it with or with out patches. i installed it and it is fresh right now. all my other benches for crysis has beeen with.

 

run both... single card only

i think ill do my crysis video pretty soon....we can use ken lee's way of doing it. to get a good in game comparison between all cards...

 

I think they are in the right one... DMC4 does'n't have "medium" settings, only Low, High and Super High, so while other games use Medium settings at 1024x768, DMC4 uses High at the same resolution, and Super High at the native one.

 

nevermind...i see what cha mean now...

 

here is crysis unpatched single 3870 at native. on high settings.
5/14/2009 9:41:44 AM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1900x1200, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=2, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 103.13s, Average FPS: 19.39
Min FPS: 7.84 at frame 143, Max FPS: 28.37 at frame 987
Average Tri/Sec: -14124157, Tri/Frame: -728281
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.26
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 93.44s, Average FPS: 21.40
Min FPS: 7.84 at frame 143, Max FPS: 29.13 at frame 984
Average Tri/Sec: -15562099, Tri/Frame: -727045
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.26
TimeDemo Play Ended, (2 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

5/14/2009 9:41:44 AM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Last Average FPS: 21.40
.

i am going to run crossfire now.


here is the same settings crossfired.
5/14/2009 9:53:39 AM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1900x1200, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 100.28s, Average FPS: 19.94
Min FPS: 11.83 at frame 1945, Max FPS: 28.41 at frame 981
Average Tri/Sec: -14524354, Tri/Frame: -728242
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.26
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 93.84s, Average FPS: 21.31
Min FPS: 11.83 at frame 1945, Max FPS: 28.45 at frame 1011
Average Tri/Sec: -15466799, Tri/Frame: -725712
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.26
!TimeDemo Run 2 Finished.
Play Time: 93.49s, Average FPS: 21.39
Min FPS: 11.83 at frame 1945, Max FPS: 28.57 at frame 986
Average Tri/Sec: -15528113, Tri/Frame: -725879
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.26
TimeDemo Play Ended, (3 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

5/14/2009 9:53:39 AM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX10 1900x1200 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 21.35

 

Yep, crossfire not workin. But other M17 owners have crysis and crossfire working, don't they? Not bad results for a single card at that res though.

 

no they would have the same results.

here is 1024*768 everything med.
5/14/2009 10:12:09 AM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1024x768, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=2, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: Medium
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 56.82s, Average FPS: 35.20
Min FPS: 15.89 at frame 1944, Max FPS: 54.01 at frame 1003
Average Tri/Sec: 25922490, Tri/Frame: 736408
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.24
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 56.55s, Average FPS: 35.37
Min FPS: 15.82 at frame 1948, Max FPS: 54.51 at frame 78
Average Tri/Sec: 26329586, Tri/Frame: 744488
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: 1.23
TimeDemo Play Ended, (2 Runs Performed)
==============================================================

Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

5/14/2009 10:12:09 AM - Vista 64

Run #1- DX10 1024x768 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Last Average FPS: 35.37

that was unpatched i am going to run pacthed but just -10fps for motion blur.

 

Ok Dr.fel, i have things for you to update.

My W7 is

Windows 7 Ultimate
64 Bit
Build 7100

And i got my drivers running,
It is the official ATI 9.4 Windows 7 64 Release

With the 9.2 Catalyst control centre.

So ATI 9.4

I will re-run benchmarks now that the drivers are fully operational + Crysis bench is now operational.

Crysis benchmarks in, happy with these

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

14/05/2009 20:46:27 - Vista 64



Run #1- DX9 800x600 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: Low ~~ Last Average FPS: 84.07

NEXT BENCH RUN- 14/05/2009 20:56:41 - Vista 64


Run #1- DX10 800x600 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: Low ~~ Last Average FPS: 68.72

NEXT BENCH RUN- 14/05/2009 21:01:53 - Vista 64


Run #1- DX9 1024x768 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Last Average FPS: 52.67

NEXT BENCH RUN- 14/05/2009 21:05:34 - Vista 64


Run #1- DX10 1024x768 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: Medium ~~ Last Average FPS: 47.13

NEXT BENCH RUN- 14/05/2009 21:08:28 - Vista 64


Run #1- DX9 1400x960 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Last Average FPS: 35.25

NEXT BENCH RUN- 14/05/2009 21:11:50 - Vista 64


Run #1- DX10 1400x960 AA=No AA, 64 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Last Average FPS: 33.56

 

Thanks! I'm going to update the chart today.

I was wondering about including 2 desktop benchmarks in the chart, as a reference. Maybe of a fast dual core + 9600 GT or 4670 and a non-extreme quad-core and a 4870 or similar. What do you think? Anybody interested on running the tests?

 

System Memory is DDR2 or DDR3? 800, 1066 or 1333 MHz?

 

Hehe, we finally have some completed rows on the benchmark web Awesome, this is a really great idea!

I think it is worth putting on some Desktop benches, to see how far/close we are to a desktops level of performance, in this case i'd also promote OCing the laptops a bit.

 

Not a lot of new data these days (neither in the Spanish side)...

 

Hehe, i will try get the benchmarks on some of my other laptops and inform the German MSI forums to join.

 

Chart updated in the low end: added Mobility 4570 and 4530 (Crysis only).

 

WIC low 95
WIC medium 63
WIC high 35

X3 low 86.563
X3 medium 80.413
X3 high 66.772

Both of these games are more CPU bound, even on high settings. I'll have a QX9300 to test them with soon.

 

Thanks! Another row complete! Chart updated.

Yes, concerning GPU performance, the Crysis GPU benchmark and DMC4 seem the most interesting, but strategy games such as WIC are popular too, and as we list CPU, the info can be useful.

 

If I'm bored enough, I'll redo the whole chart with the QX9300 lol

It'll be interesting to see the difference it makes on an identical platform though. That information can be hard to find.

 

Almost 1 month since the last message! Anybody else wanting to contribute? Other graphics cards?

 

Hehe yeah its gone quiet, i would wait for m17x benchmarks to pile in, i've been suggesting the tests from here in the alienware forum x3-tc due to its unbiased nature and so on.

I will re-run benchmarks on 32bit os with 9.5 possibly 9.6 drivers with the ati overclock on, hopefully, my scores should get atleast another 5 fps on all games

 

Alright, since there are some Overclocked results on the page, I felt like the 4850 had to be represented OC'd as well. I ran the 4 High benchmarks again with my info the same except my GPU is OC'd to 550/900.

Crysis 26.8
DMC4 DX10 74.2
WIC 37
X3TC 71.0

 

I will post some benchmarks done on the machine in my signature for comparative purposes, a Sager NP9262.

GPU-Z Validation:

GPU-Z - 8800m GTX SLi @ 650 MHz Core, 1,650 MHz Shader and 1,050 MHz Memory

HD Tune:

HD Tune - 200 GB @ 7,200 RPM x3 Intel Matrix RAID-0

Windows Vista Experience Index:

Sager NP9262 - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ Stock - 8800m GTX SLi @ Stock - Apacer 4 GB of DDR2 RAM @ 800 MHz on 2 DIMM's - 200 GB @ 7,200 RPM x3 Intel Matrix RAID-0

3DMark 2006:

3DMark 2006 - 8800m GTX SLi @ Stock

3DMark 2006 - 8800m GTX SLi @ 650 MHz Core, 1,650 MHz Shader and 1,050 MHz Memory

3DMark Vantage:

3DMark Vantage - 8800m GTX SLi @ Stock

3DMark Vantage - 8800m GTX SLi @ 650 MHz Core / 1,650 MHz Shader / 1,050 MHz Memory

Far Cry 2:

Far Cry 2 - Ultra High - DirectX 10 - 1920x1200 - 8800m GTX SLi @ Stock

Devil May Cry 4:

Devil May Cry 4 - Super High - 1920x1200, 8800m GTX SLi @ Stock

FurMark:

FurMark - 1920x1200 - Benchmarking Mode - 60000 MS - 8800m GTX SLi @ Stock

 

hey, im waiting on you with your desktop...when is aurora coming out??? lol

 

Currently, I am waiting for Intel Gulftown (32nm, 6 Cores, 12 Threads) processors to come out in Q1 or Q2 2010, and for Nvidia GT300 (40nm, Around x2 the performance of GT200) in Q3 or Q4 2009.

I am anxious to see how my project turns out, good, hopefully; the machine is going to be completely watercooled (Processor, Graphics Card(s), Hard Drives, RAM, Northbridge, Power Supply Unit) by a ERM-2K3U unit from Koolance, with up to 2,000 Watts of Heat Dissipation. (I am thinking about getting the ERM-3K4U5 with 3,000 Watts of Heat Dissipation, but its two times more expensive than the 3U one, just for 1,000 Watts of Heat Dissipation, however, it has 5 pumps instead of just one, a server-grade / cluster-grade liquid heat dissipation unit.)

I will make sure to get some benchmarks around when I am done tweaking the system.

 

Read the first post in the thread... This is not a random benchmark thread, its purpose is to collect 4 specific benchmarks at specific settings from different systems.

 

I posted my benchmark results for comparative purposes only, so that the OP has more information to base his decision on, I read the original post and know the purpose for this thread, thanks for the notice, though, my post also includes a Devil May Cry 4 benchmark at Native Resolution as requested by the OP.

I am sorry for the misunderstanding, now I have edited my post to reflect my intention for posting my benchmark results in this thread.

 

nice..my little old setup can get as low as 10c on a good day and no over clocking...about 18'c while over clocked and idle. currently ranked about 25th in the world and 6th at evga... would love to see some numbers out of your rig!

 

Thanks for the new contributions! I'm very busy today, I hope to be able to update the chart tomorrow.

 

Shameless thread bump. There are way to many GTX 260m's on the market now to not have them represented here. Go the the first page for instructions, make sure you use the listed settings.

 

100% certain you would find what you are looking for in the ASUS or Alienware forums.

 

Not really. Not those benchmarks run at those exact settings so they can be compared to the rest. Also, results posted here go to http://optimitza.cat/benchmarks/laptops in a nice concise little table.

 

Yeah. It seems people doesn't like this topic anymore

It seems there are few comparisons comprising the GTX 260M SLI. Is anybody aware of good gaming benchmarks of this card?

 

i'm still in. cept i sold my whitebook and my sager and got an m17x. but somethings are missing that's why. i can't put my finger on it

 

I'll run these on the new G72 and let you know.