****The Official 3DMark Comparison List!!! Post you scores here!***

P8400 @ 2.5ghz, 4GB ram, 512MB Nvidia 9800M GTS (well, its GS but flashed to GTS speed).

Test done in 1280x768 (sorry, my screen max res is 1366x768) and with bunch of programs like steam running on the background (typical usage)

SM 2.0 Score 4456
SM 3.0 Score 4388
CPU Score 2110 (low, as I have gotten up to 2386 once)

3DMark Score: 9495 3DMarks

-----------------------------------------------------
re-ran test and got (with same settings and not much running on backround)

SM 2.0 Score 4568
SM 3.0 Score 4445
CPU Score 2233

3DMark Score 9773

 

Thanks for you input, and you can't be any more right, the res really makes a difference on what score you get, since it's 2AM right now i won't' attempt to change the list but tomorrow morning or afternoon i wil change it!

If anyone else has any more recomendations about anything please tell me because i would like to see this list make a sticky someday

 

nice i assume that you have a g50vt-x1

 

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 at 2.4 GHz
GPU: Nvidia GeForce 9500M GS 512MB DDR2, overclocked to 635 core, 1270 shaders, and 460 memory, using 179.28 drivers
RAM: 4GB DDR2

3DMark06: 4421 at 1366x768 (equivalent to 1280x800)
3DMark Vantage: E7215 at 1024x768

 

3DMark06 score: 13517
Graphics Card: 8800M GTX SLi
CPU: X9000

 

8600M GS T5670
OCed to 660/1450/900
3dmark06 @1280*1024 3601
3dmark06 @1280*800 4031

now running at 600/1300/900 because it's too hot!

 

Another score update, still playing with the drivers:

3dMark06 @ 1366x768: 10,082
3dMark06 @ 1280x720: 10,431

Here's the screen from the 1280x720 run (No, it's not really a 9800M GT):

 

1280x800
8800gts 512mb
T9300
vista 32bit
latest dox drivers
Score 9100.
have uninstalled dox drivers as Empire total War hates them.

 

1280x800
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
P8600 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
XP Professional 32-bit
Nvidia's 179.48 drivers
Score: 2111

 

1280 * 768
nVidia 8400M GS 256 MB O/C
Dox 185.20 Driver
Windows Xp SP3
Score : 2378

 

1st one from me

 

Ah, that Extreme... That's a great score!

 

It says extreme but actually it is a stock q9100.

 

lol...that's awesome. Why does it say extreme though? and nice score BTW!

 

My Score nothing Special but.......
8600MGT DDR3 (Core=560)(Memory=750)(Shader=1120)
Screen Rez = 1280x800 (5359)

 

I think the problem with this is there is no standard for screen size or overclocking. Some people are oc'ing and others aren't. Some are using high screen resolutions others are not. I think it all needs to be a standard. Like if you overclock post both your stock score and your over clock score. Also, for 3dmark 06 choose 1280x800 resolution and for vantage the minimum 1280x1024 will all other settings in the benchmarking programs untouched.

 

nVidia Quadro NVS 140m with 128MB - overclocked to 650/950 by Rivatuner

1280x1024

3DMark06: 2432

maybe more with new HDD now, dont know

 

Dammit, I'm not last, although I should be

 

For there to be a standard, resolution is not as important to maintain as it is for CPU. Any user with quad cores or heavily OCd CPUs will have enormous scores that do not mean anything at all.

 

1280 x 1024
Intel T9400
Nvidia 9800GS 512MB OC (580-1500-850)
Driver: DOX 182.05
3dMark06: 9523




without OC (530-1325-800) it is around 8600 with the same driver

 

i got 10625 , 8800m gtx oced to 560/1460/860
1280x1024 everything on default, just curious , at this oc level my top temp is 63C , how much higher can i go...and whats with dox drivers and downclocking of mem and core clock speeds lol after 25 mins of gaming top temp 65 everything downclocks until reboot

 

Most recent benchmarks using clocks in sig:

1366x768: 10,093
1280x768: 10,273

 

10,000 sweet

 

meh i give up my system cant do more than 10712 3DMarks without going up in flames ( i shud be able to oc more with a more suitable driver, which i cant find grr lol)

 

laptop in sig....3870's at STOCK clocks....3dmark06 default....16,105

 

Didn't see the memory request on the first post last time. I have 3.5 GB of DDR2 667 MHz. Or 4 GB if you go by how much it physically is, but Windows recognizes 3.5 GB of it. I'm not listed yet. Also had a score of 4215 with 178.26 and 595/400 clocks from last fall, but the Dox ones are more recent and I've used those drivers more.

 

My 8400GT in a Sony Vaio FZ gets 1953 in 3dmark06 at 1280 by 800 with no overclocking. The other components are a Core 2 Cuo T7100 1.8 ghz processor, 2GB of 667 ram and a 120GB 5400rpm hard drivw.

 

I know its old but could be used for comparion sake.

Asus Z84Jp Geforce 7700 Go 512MB and a T7600

In 3DMark 2006 1280x1024 = 3032

Not a bad score and shows vs todays card it is still very capable.

 

X9000-3.4 Ghz
9800m GT SLI

Score-14250
(1600X1200)

 

Gateway P-7811FX
T9600 2.8GHZ
9800m GTS 512MB
With XP and XF 177.85
3DMark06 @ 1280 x 1024 OC to 750-1020-1998 11034pts

 

wooo finally broke 10k at default res 10031
new W7 build 7057 rocks.

 

Congrats in joining the 10,000 club There's no going back now......

 

@ fatmandoo: Win XP scores don't count anywhere.

 

Add my scores to the list they are in my sig.

 

With the specs in my sig (cpu at 3.0, no oc gpu, drivers 179.13) I got 13038 at 3d mark06.

 

Wow, nice score, you should run it at 1280x1024 or 1280x800 so your score is relative to everyone else.

 

omg x9000 at 3.4ghz !! mine bsods for no reason at 3.2ghz help!

 

Just did my first GPU overclock 3DMark06 test:

9233 Marks @ 1280 x 720 using 179.48 Nvidia drivers. In non OC'd configuration (GPU clocks in sig), I usually hit ~8500.

I think I'll try using those DOX drivers from laptopvideo2go.com and see how much improvement I get.

 

That memory is scarily high clocked, Mobius

I don't have the guts to try that.

 

I was doing some extensive Lost Planet DX10 @ 1920 x 1080 testing, and there were benefits to be had by overclocking the memory. It seems that our 9800Ms despite 1600 MHz of 256 bit interface goodness, seem to be a bit starved

Going from 600/1500/800 to 600/1500/950 yielded a noticable increase about 2 FPS up from 13.- if I remember right, remember this was at 1920 x 1080 too

But yeah, I actually had a crash at 1000 MHz memory clock, or well not really a crash, the benchmark refused to render, though you could hear it goin despite the black screen. But 950 is stable, and I did have a crash at 650 with the core clock. 600/1500/950 is my max now

What program did you use to OC your CPU and RAM?

 

Everything at stock speeds:

8600M GT DDR2 (ForceWare 179.48)
T9300 @ 2.5 GHz
1280x800
3DMark06: 3869

 

setFSB, they are linked so the memory OC'd with the processor.

 

@ 1024x768? Why bother running it at so low of a resolution?

 

Why is that? I'm not trying to argue but just curious..
And with Vista 64bit Ultimate, most I got was 10683pts.. Couldn't break 11k

 

got 9374 @ 1366x768
and 9495 @ 1280x768
and 9930 @ 1024x768
using DOX 182.46

 

can i get on this list? check my sig....

 

It's really just because Vista runs are the standard, and XP runs inflate scores.

 

ASUS W90Vp-X1
O/S = Vista HP 64bit
CPU = T9600 (2.8GHz) @ 3.05GHz
Memory = 6Gb DDR2 @ 728MHz
Video = ATI 4870 (x2) 512Mb GDDR3 ea. in Crossfire

3DMark06 Score = 13978
Resolution = 1920x1080

3DMark06 Score = 14447
Resolution = 1280x1024

 

Dang I'm so jealous

 

Uh oh, looks like the big guns are coming into the battle.

That 1080p run is whoa.