Measure your Dual/Multi Core Notebook CPU Speed - Bye Bye to SuperPI

Not a bad time. I am not an overclocker. I got some new rams so I wanted to see what they were up too .

 

i'll try it in safe mode because it appears to be a trend...

 

I don't overclock, but I also don't see how what is in your screenshot is possible. Wprime scales more or less linearly with clock speed so I don't understand how a 1.7 GHz T2250 can get 32.8 seconds while the 2.4 GHz T8300 gets roughly the same result. Unless... was the Core architecture actually better than Core 2 clock for clock?

 

could be the same reason for this

 

OK, now it makes even less sense -- those are processors with the same architecture and greater clock speeds, they should be better. I think your processor is either some kind of mutant or simply got mislabeled. There is no way a normal T2250 can be that good.

 

tbh, i don't know myself as it came back from the repair shop like this.

 

Clevo D901C

E8300

 

btw... the secret... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=800445

 

Latest run I have done to this date, also the fastest:

Sager NP9262 / Clevo D901C - Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 2.67 GHz - 8800m GTX SLi - 4 GB of Apacer RAM @ 800 MHz in 2 SODIMM's - Triple Toshiba 200 GB @ 7,200 RPM Hard Drives in Intel Matrix RAID-0:



Smoking Hot!

 

Nice!! intense rig

 

Fastest T7300 Methinks



In Vista Home Premium Sp1

 

So yours is at 2.5 then and not 1.7

 

yes but the Sandra one i meant, if i run it at stock then its still VERY much higher. i think maybe the numbers for the T series are wrong because the T8300 or whichever one you said is higher rated than mine

edit: see here it is underclocked to 1300Mhz or something

 

Thanks.

I wonder how much I will get at wPrime with the desktop rig I am building:

[Link.]

 

EDIT:

Can't wait till I upgrade my M6862 with a Penryn!

 

The test seems to take advantage of threading very well. Dual Core results at the same frequency and similiar architecture are twice and fast and quad core almost 4x faster.

Is dual core really that helpful for simple web browsing and word processing? Maybe add a single threaded benchmark?

I have a mobile Sempron @ 1.8Ghz in my laptop. I am considering upgrading to MK-38(Single Core 2.2 Ghz) or TL-58(Dual Core 1.9Ghz). For things like booting-up etc the MK-38 would be faster right?

 

Here are mine (for my desktop rig--specs in the sig)

 

35.703secs with a T7600 2.33Ghz 4MB cache memory running at 533Mhz 4-4-4-12.

Vista Home Premium x86/32bit
Chipset/Northbridge: Intel 945PM
Notebook: Sony Vaio FE31M

 

These Intels are flying .

 

Indeed around a 2Ghz intel core 2 duo ought to be enough for anybody! (i'll laugh when i read this in 10years haha)

 

i only have 670Ms to go to beat 30 seconds on my T2250! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=800445

 

Hey! The Hubble telescope is still using components from the 80s!!! You don't see NASA laughing about it .

 

As I'm new here, I will now submit my wPrime from my Notebook and My Desktop.

Notebook Acer Aspire 6935G with P8600 (2.4GHz)

See my Notebook Review

Desktop [email protected]

 

got 53.359 on my t5500 someday ill try with firefox,nod,rainlendar,gigaget,theme closed..

 

Looks like my Octi-tron owns
Its barely breaking a sweat with wprime

Specs at the time of the test:
2 x AMD Opteron 2347's at stock 1.9Ghz (8 core) only 2gb reading of my 4gb kingston pc6400 ecc memory (Windows Server 2003 standard edition 32 bit trial). Run on ASUS LIN64SLI-WS/B with dual dynatron a86G coolers
Its a laptop for me, but I guess it goes under the desktop category cause its a homebuild.



K-TRON

 

Just installed a bunch of memory, this is in as used everyday configuration with the exeption of just turning off my Avast package.
Does this seem reasonable? Tomas M. 5 posts above kicks my butt with a lesser processor, is he super tuning or am I super slow?

 

His is overclocked I believe, yours seems reasonable.

 

32M in Wprime was 36.453 secs at stock and 29.609 OC @ 2.86 ghtz

 

AsusM51;
4gb Ram
Cpu intel core 2 duo 2.4ghz@ 2.7
300gb 5200 rpm
ati mobility hd 3650 512 DDR2 from 600/400@700/450
Windows vista ultimate x64 sp1 PT-PT

 

Eh... Did this on my Clevo D901C

Windows Vista Ultimate
4GB RAM
Stock clock speeds. Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550

 

I have no idea if this is still being updated but I (finally) upgraded the L100 from this:

25.) moon angel Intel Celeron-M 380 CPU @ 1.60GHz NB: Toshiba Satellite Pro L100 XP Pro 128.812s

...to this:

 

Via Nano U2250 (in Samsung NC20).

32M = 174.165

1024M = 5677.625s

John

 

This thread is kind of dusty.

Any new scores?

Still taking desktop scores?

 

I think Desktop scores are for Desktopreview.

Dusty...
yes, I think my SZ was never added to the list, even though in terms of speed it should have been (at the time that I ran the programme).

But in some places its unfair too - you can't expect a 13" to be as powerful as a gaming laptop - one would have to distinguish these too...

You could start a new one if you are willing to maintain it.

 

just joining the clan here

Lenovo 3000 G410 with Intel Pentium T2370 1.73GHz, 32M score: 54.75 secs

 

What version of wPrime are y'all using?

 

wPrime 2.00

 

Thx; still neccessary to set the thread count to 2 in this version regardless of CPU?

 

hmm, i think the program will detect your hardware and if it found out you use multiple core CPU, will set the thread count accordingly.

So if you have Quad Core, it will set the thread count to 4 by default.

CMIIW ....

 

29.28s running at 1.598GHz & 2 threads; not sure why it didn't run it at 2.53GHz...
edit - left it at the default 4 threads - 15.292s running at 1.598GHz & the default 4 threads...seems a bit more like it, but wonder why it shows my CPU to be a "1596MHz Yorkfield E0".

Looks like I just whupped the Notebooks score posted on the first page.

 

Your power management active?
If it is, use the "high performance" profile. Then re-run the program.
Note: You have to close wPrime first before changing the power management profile. If not, wPrime will run using the old profile although you already changed it.

Btw, my lenovo with "low power" mode only run (and detected) at 798MHz and thus making the score lower.

 

Thx - had already set the Power Management to "Performance".
Ran the test again and got 15.191s this time with Aero disabled.
All tests were made with my settings as normal, and with my Anti Virus enabled.

 

you should disabled your anti-virus because your AV actually scanning files in the background.

you will get better score with AV disabled.

 

Results submitted to HWBot under Team NBR.

 

welcome to the team

 

I did not know we had a desktop section now too! While this was a good achievement about 9 months ago when I built it the i7 can easily beat my score.

Custom Desktop
Q6600 @3.6ghz
Ram 1:1 DDR2 5-4-4-12
x64 Vista

WPrime 32M Test

 

we have desktop section?

 

Here are the results for my W90Vp-A1 running WPrime2.0:
(17.034s and 534.44s)

 

Use 1.55 its what all the other scores are on and what is used for the hwbot database.