Measure your Dual/Multi Core Notebook CPU Speed - Bye Bye to SuperPI

I really, really cannot wait to see what will my new rig be able to do, I am going to order the parts soon (specs in sig), I will make sure to post here once ready, though.

 

Laptop: Acer Aspire 5315
Celeron M540@default
Vista x64

32M - 99.245 sec (1861.9 MHz Conroe-L A1)

Desktop: Custom Built
AMD Opteron 175@Default
Vista X64

32M - 40.017 sec (2211.3MHZ Denmark JH9-E6)

 

Well at least we can see that we don't necessarily have to rely on SuperPi for testing processing speed..

 

dammn, I used wPrime 2.00 when submitted my result.

 

Why aren't we using 2.0? It is supposedly more accurate for comparing multicore/modern processors.



Also, for some reason v1.55 is not taking full use of my proc (1.55 versus 2.00 attached below).

 

On 1.55, one needs to go into Advanced Settings & set the number of threads to the number of cores in your CPU.

 

Thanks!
Kind of obvious now that you have pointed it out...




Anyways, attached is the score for my W90Vp-A1 using wPrime 1.55.

	Processor (CPU)	System Type/Model	Operating System	Score (32M) - Default Test	Score (1024M) - Stress Test
gothicaleigh	Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q9000@ 2.28GHz	NB: Asus W90Vp-A1	[COLOR="Blue"]Vista Home Premium[/COLOR]	17.636s	553.262s

 

That's what I thought too. I use v2.0 because it's the newest.
But every veteran here kinda like "you should use 1.55 instead"

 

2.0 is fine and 1.55 is fine as well.

This thread just seriously needs to be updated....

I do not have the time to redo the huge HTML tables.... I might make it simpler later using vB coding.

If another mod or user wants to update it, they are welcomed to.... just PM me the final HTML code and I'll update the post.

 

Maybe easier just to start anew? Who knows how far back you will need to go to start gathering the new information. So if you start new we flush out the old data and old users.

I would lose my old scores since I do not have those systems anymore, but it would be a good idea to move to version 2.0 now since its offical and on hwbot as the new submit method.

on that note here is my W90 record right now

From W90 Benchmarks

 

well if everyone is submitting their scores properly, they should be able to look at the results and compare them on hwbot.

 

E7500 @ 3.5ghz scores 23.5 secs on Wprime 2.0

Anyone got a higher score for a dual core in a notebook here?

 

32 seconds on the T61p and 33 seconds on the R61.

Wprime 2.0

 

I have seen an E8500 beat that... in a Clevo D901C notebook.

not in this thread I dont think.

 

Was that E8500 overclocked? Running at a higher fsb and having twice the lvl 2 cache would of course give it the edge too. I would have one if it weren't for the fsb limitations the C90S has.

 

I forgot... just remember that the score was ridiculous for a dual core... around 20 sec.

 

Advent 6555

32M -19.314 sec (1596.2 MHz Yorkfield R0)

Either the clocks aren't being read properly or the multiplyer isn't kicking in properly because the clocks should be 2Ghz (1995.5 MHz) to be exact.

 

its fine, the clocks on a notebook CPU are usually being throttled, so it picks up the speed in the middle of the throttling.

if you set your CPU to run at full speed the whole time, then the clock speed will be accurate.

you score is about right though.

 

17.718 for wPrime v2.00 32M test on my new build (see sig). :GEEK:

 

SU9400 @ 1.4 Ghz. 60.1 secs for me using 32M.

 

32m- 10.921 seconds, 8 threads, OCed to 3ghz, specs in sig

 

26.065

thats as high as i can get with a OC @ 3.18 ghz i run outta voltage and crash after that

 

I have a new laptop mobile cpu score. Hows 13.774 seconds sound for a 2.0ghz Q9000 OCed to 2.915ghz almost a 50% OC

This is with WPrime 1.55, it would have been a bit faster on the new version or if I had optimized the computer for the test.

 

14.414 @2.93

Your overclocked FSB is helping a lot

 

almost exactly half of mine....

vicious it is a nice OC

 

Pictures are always more appeasing -

From W90 Benchmarks

Actually 13.774 the score I looked at before was from a 2.9ghz run.

 

Not so much the FSB as the RAM overclock and low timings.

The largest difference from your cpu and mine is mine was like $150 and included in the cost of my machine

 

Nice Score ViciousXUSMC.

I think I got around 16 seconds for 32M without overclocking.

 

I think theres one too many in the notebook hall of fame if I can post scores that get me in there lol. A bit late at the moment I will re run mystuff later.

 

Visc whats your 1024 score?

Cheers

 

My temps are 59 on the first two cores, not 99 as it appears in the pic.

q6600 @ 3.2 in this pic, 400FSB x 8 Multi stock 1.2875V
same specs as in siggy, except 200 mhz slower.

32m 12.899 sec
1024m 403.977 sec
---------------------
Nice to see that I am close to an i7!

 

IIRC, there was a slight change in the algorithm between 1.55 and 1.58 that resulted in a slight difference in times with all other things equal. There's probably a slight difference between 1.55 and 2.00, as well. So the scores aren't 100% comparable, and for the best accuracy, you want everyone to be using the same version.

 

Processor (CPU) Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7300 @ 2.66GHz
System Type/Model Desktop: custom desktop
Operating System XP Pro SP3
Score (32M) - Default Test 30.078s
Score (1024M) - Stress Test n/a




Why this program won't run in W7, even running as administrator?

 

Works for me in RC. Try disabling UAC.

 

So I'm guessing 33.597 sec for 32m leaves a bit to be desired.

T9300 2.5ghz 4gb PC5300

although CPUz is reporting a cpu clock of 1198mhz (seems too low, ideas to increase it? Dell M6300)

 

Here's my numbers for my i7 920 CPU

Top result - running with 8 thread count
Bottom result - running with 4 thread count

 

T9500 ES 2,6GHz/6MB/FSB 800 @ ThinkPad T61

 

43.51 seconds for 32m wPrime
T5850 2.16ghz C2D undervolted to 1.000V
4gb ram
vista 64 bit
View Score wPrime 32M test | wPrime Multithreaded Benchmark

 

I can't get version 2.03 to run at all. Have tried compatibility mode, run as admin, and nothing. It just says error occurred -2147024703 right after it tries to initiate the thread structure.

 

Could be a problem with the new Turion II - maybe version 2.03 doesn't support it...

 

Lenovo X200 Tablet Intel SL9300 4Gb ram 45nm with IDA Win7 x64

 

Can someone explain why wPrime gave me better scores (fewer seconds) for the 32M test on my stock CPU clocks (BCLK) and worse scores (more seconds) on my CPU overclocks?

I used the settings of 4 threads.

I thought overclocking the CPU would increase its processing power and lower the seconds needed to compute in wPrime.

My CPU is a i5-450m in a Acer 3820TG.

 

I can not get any version of Wprime to work on my laptop. I always get an error that says library already exists, and then Error occurred -2147024703. Any idea what's up?