Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
Titan V slower than 1080ti tensorflow:18.08-py3 and 396.54 drivers
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/...-py3-and-396-54-drivers/post/5305057/#5305057
"Our next driver release on 1/15/19 will have the update.
Here’s the nvsmi command that will uncap mclk on TitanV:
nvidia-smi.exe --cuda-clocks=OVERRIDE
To return to default:
nvidia-smi.exe --cuda-clocks=RESTORE_DEFAULTS
Best, Tom
Devtalk Community Manager | NVIDIA Corporation"
"I have just been informed that version 417.35 has the update. Let us know if you have any issues.
https://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/141167/en-us
Devtalk Community Manager | NVIDIA Corporation"
"Thanks Tom for the update! May I know if it's going to be supported in Linux driver version 417.35 also?"
"Yes, the update made it into 415.25 for Linux.
https://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/141448/en-us "
"Hi Tom, thanks for the info.
Checked with the 415.25 drivers in Linux and it works like a charm. Now Titan V is able to drain more than 300W."
-
Aroc, Robbo99999, jclausius and 2 others like this.
-
The Most Complete Used GPU Comparison Yet. Pascal, Vega & Much More!
Hardware Unboxed
Published on Jan 5, 2019
Read this feature on TechSpot:
https://www.techspot.com/article/1775-guide-buying-used-graphics-card/
Graphs: https://www.patreon.com/posts/23771313
December used sales numbers and price vs performance starts @ 04:29
Last edited: Jan 5, 2019Dr. AMK, Aroc and Robbo99999 like this. -
-
Given the graph numbers showing the difference in performance in FPS between no RT cores vs RT cores, the uplift from Volta to Turing with RT cores is 25%-35% faster, not "many times" faster.
I can't find the comparison I recall seeing, but Nvidia showed a "many times faster" comparison with / without RT cores... that suggested the difference between real-time capability and non-real-time capability. I'll see if I can find it and edit this to include it.
Also there is a chart showing Turing uplift in shader performance between Pascal and Turing that suggests there is another 50% multiplicative bump in performance between Pascal and Turing that is helping uplift real-time ray-tracing performance:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/13282/nvidia-turing-architecture-deep-dive/4
Which begs the question, with all of that advantage in architecture between Pascal and Turing, why did Nvidia cheat the gaming community by holding back on basic performance from generation to generation, yet increase the price points dramatically - putting ownership out of the hands of so many that rely on Nvidia to be inclusive of all gamers?
Nvidia has completely ignored the $100, $150, $200, $250, $300 price points previously available, given a 50% performance uplift in basic shader / rasterization performance - along with the additional boosts from process and tidying up optimizations - should have made this new generation a complete success with all gamers, instead of only the 2080ti / Titan RTX buyers.
Everyone else is paying the same $ for the same performance +- core count distribution, which means Nvidia has created a noop flop of a GPU release out of what could have been a total success for everyone interested in buying one of the new generation GPU's.
Nvidia's failing is that they continued to ignore their base market of gaming enthusiasts and burned us all with this overpriced and underwhelming GPU generation.
When we can purchase last generation GPU's at the same MSRP and less actual cost for the same performance of the new generation, that's a total failure of a generational GPU release by Nvidia.Last edited: Jan 6, 2019 -
-
-
@hmscott Was you in the jury?
You need to come out from the closet
View attachment upload_2019-1-7_5-28-15.gif
NVIDIA GeForce RTX-20 Series Win CES 2019 Innovation Award
Techpowerup.com | Today, 05:04
The Consumer Electronics Association (CEA), the body behind CES, handed out CES 2019 Innovation Awards, with NVIDIA bagging one for its GeForce RTX 20-series graphics cards. CEA considered the RTX 2080 Ti, RTX 2080, and RTX 2070 for this award, and remarked the company's RTX technology to be "revolutionary," and that the "Turing" architecture it's based on brings real-time raytracing and artificial intelligence hardware-acceleration to the consumer space, augmenting programmable shading that's dominated consumer graphics for close to two decades now.Vasudev likes this. -
It's all about the new "BS" technology that pulls in cash, not whether it does anything useful in itself. That's what won the votes, the best cash grabbing scam.
Another cash cow train that people can ride to rake in the bucks, literally buzzword-worthy shiny overpriced sucker bait.
RTX - Nvidia's "hopeful" future for disposable income for 2019.
Last edited: Jan 7, 2019Vasudev likes this. -
I loved how Nvidia stretched the "performance" from 1070, to 1070ti, and then heck that's really close to a 1080, so it performs like a 1080 for $349.
I don't believe Nvidia's crap now any more than their first RTX announcement. That Nvidia graph that carefully shows the 2060 is much faster than the 1070ti is total malarkey based on "select" data that fits their narrative, not a real world view of performance.
Even the leaked benchmarks all showed performance between a 1070 and 1070ti, except for a couple better scores than a 1070ti due to faster memory. The core counts of the 2060 are more like the 1070, and so unless there are specific games that do better - what Nvidia will rely on to create distorted one sided graphs like that above - I'd not get too excited until real benchmarks come out for production cards on the 14th.
We all know that the 1070ti OC'd will make it up to a stock 1080 in many tests, so don't forget that when doing the comparison yourself. We also need to see 2060 OC vs 1070ti OC.
I'd suggest once again to wait for independent benchmarks before buying, and don't cherry pick the best results to justify wasting money on RTX BS, *really* look at all the numbers with a critical eye, you'll come away with a better real view of what's what to make an informed buying decision.
You can find 1070ti's with 8GB for the same or less, and that's a much better solution. Bump up to the $399 AIB price's (or more) and spend that on a real 1080 8GB, or even a nice used 1080ti, and you've really got something known with dependable results already established - even a used 10 series is a better choice at a better price.
I wouldn't believe any of that RTX 2060 made up BS - you can't rely on it, and there are effectively 0 games that support RT+DLSS. It's all smoke, mirror's, and marketing BS to sell overpriced shiny baubles. Just like all of the Nvidia marketing BS, you've got to wait for real results.
The pricing "starts" at $349, even if Jensen was careful not to explicitly say that this time, the AIB cards - the desirable ones - will be more expensive. Unless AMD surprises us and releases a competitive 7nm consumer GPU, then the Nvidia prices might drop.
I wouldn't spend inflated prices on 10 series priced to gouge people - those still priced like the mining crazies were spending - if you search and are patient, there are supposed to be $2B worth of backed up 10 series channel hardware out there, it should start showing up.
There may still be scalpers looking to skin the cash from the unwary for 10 series GPU's - I see them on that newegg like, but as long as you don't give in you won't get taken too. Search other venues, use the google shopping or other shopping tools to find sales and good prices.Last edited: Jan 7, 2019 -
-
@Papusan
The laptop power specs don't bode well, compared to the desktop RTX GPU power requirements.
The Nvidia published power limits for the laptop GPU's are a lot lower than the desktop GPU's:
Given the 2080 FE is supposed to be 225w and base model 215w, the mobile range of 80w-150w seems a bit too low to attain full 1080ti performance in the laptop.
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/graphics-cards/rtx-2080/
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition Review: Faster, More Expensive Than GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Power Consumption
https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2080-founders-edition,5809-10.htmlLast edited: Jan 7, 2019ajc9988, bennyg, Dr. AMK and 1 other person like this. -
-
Pretty sure competitive BF players were already playing w/TAA disabled using the console command, and at potato settings with the brightness jacked up.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The 1070ti and 2060 FE match performance, when they OC'd the 2060FE it matched the 1080 stock - but so does the 1070ti when OC'd
It comes down to price, and avoiding the RTX BS, so getting a new or used 1070ti / RX 56 / RX 64 all around the same price would still be the better choice, no need to feed the overpricing urge left over from the crazies buying up gaming cards to collect majick numbers (crypto).
From the article quoted in that video review:
"Is the RTX 2060 worth buying, and should you upgrade your current graphics card? As usual that depends.
...
I still wish prices were a bit lower, though, as an Nvdia "60" GPU going for $350 feels a bit too much like the cryptocurrency-induced pricing of 2018.
Let's hope street prices fall a bit closer to $300 on the basic models."
- Dream on, more likely the pricing will be hitting $399++ at retail for the desirable sku's.
NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 2060 REVIEW
By Jarred Walton 16 hours ago
https://www.pcgamer.com/nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-review/#comment-jumpTalon likes this. -
Why would you even…?
Linus Tech Tips
Published on Jan 7, 2019
The lowest-priced RTX-capable graphics card has finally arrived, but should you upgrade, or is your money better spent elsewhere?
NVIDIA RTX 2060 Hands-On: Ray tracing on a budget
Engadget
Published on Jan 7, 2019
NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 2060 is here, months after the company unveiled the higher-end RTX 2080 Ti, 2080 and 2070 graphics cards. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang unveiled the new GPU during his CES keynote, where he revealed that the card was powering a Battlefield V demo showing off real-time ray tracing. That's surprising, since you'd expect him to use the company's most powerful GPUs for a press conference being viewed by gamers around the world.
Read more: https://www.engadget.com/2019/01/07/nvidias-349-rtx-2060-gpu-is-more-powerful-than-a-1070-ti/
"RTX is available on a "handful" of games. Apparently a "handful" equals "1"
Swee Seen 6 minutes ago
"you call this a budget ?"
Nuj Star 4 minutes ago (edited)
"rtx 2070 should be 349... rip-off"Last edited: Jan 8, 2019
Nvidia Thread
Discussion in 'Hardware Components and Aftermarket Upgrades' started by Dr. AMK, Jul 4, 2017.
