Just for the sake of comparison, I installed gnome on my arch install and did a comparison. I optimized all daemons and modules to as slim as possible for the test.
Note: I use .xinitrc to boot my desired desktop so no login manager to slow things down.
Results:
KDE: Did 5 boot tests. The average time of boot was 18 seconds (as posted)
Gnome: Same 5 tests was able to boot with a average of 13 seconds
Gnome is faster in booting! The desktop feels the same as KDE in responsiveness.
Now, my openbox kills both with a boot time of 8 seconds (It boots insanely fast, there even is a slight drive lag as X starts because it loads so dang fast).
My personal test does not prove much besides my own theory to myself. Feel free to run your own tests but KDE is a bit slower booting then gnome. KDE even needs to show the pretty startup screen where gnome don't.
-
corbintechboy Notebook Consultant
-
-
I used to use Gnome all the time. I have been using KDE for the last month though, and i can attest to it being slower in that aspect, (as i have not tested it thoroughly), but not enough of an impact to where it matters. though..everyone is going to have a different opinion on this... -
corbintechboy Notebook Consultant
And for those who use any of the *buntu distributions are going to have a slight advantage to boot time because they don't use the BSD init system where most distributions still use the BSD init system, that improves boot to a degree. -
My experience is that the speed of KDE 4 highly depends on ones graphics hardware (and of course the driver). If you have a pretty strong graphics card it can be very fast, but if you have something with very limited or no acceleration capabilities (e.g. older integrated Intel graphics) it becomes very slow.
-
Interesting, I havent used KDE in a while (around 5 years) but before that I was under the impression that KDE was faster than Gnome as gnome had more eye candy.
-
Also, I did a post on Gnome 3 on my blog if anyone wants to read it here. -
-
-
What might be interesting for me is the scheduler patch that is said to increase the responsiveness [1]. I guess Liquorix already has that implemented. On the other hand I tried the userspace alternative some time ago but didn't notice any difference in my case [2].
[1] Gmane Loom
[2] Gmane Loom -
corbintechboy Notebook Consultant
I have also used Debian in the past and have very good luck compiling my own kernel. You may be able to compile a new kernel which may have better drivers as well as better system optimization in general. -
Honestly I'm pretty lazy. I want a system that runs fine out of the box, and Debian gives me that. I have no problems with tinkering, I simply prefer not to do it if everything I need works up to a point that I'm fine with. -
-
-
Maybe the most important site for people looking for software in Debian:
Debian -- Packages
...and its Ubuntu counterpart:
Ubuntu -- Ubuntu Packages Search -
Just a heads up. -
just curious. -
I haven't used Gnome in awhile. I use KDE exclusively.
-
-
Is Ubuntu bloated?
Discussion in 'Linux Compatibility and Software' started by Kyle, Dec 17, 2010.