I am running it at the moment and actually have run the new 3dmark as well so I know the difference. However the thermal paste I had seems to be pretty bad for the gpu (temps reach ~90c in 3dmark) so I'm going to order some gelid extreme (which seems to be popular and I've read good things about it) before really benching my card again. Might as well repaste the cpu with the same paste once I get it to drop temps even further.
Edit: the runs I made when testing temps:
AMD Radeon HD 7970M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2670QM Processor,CLEVO P150HMx <- Stock
AMD Radeon HD 7970M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2670QM Processor,CLEVO P150HMx <-Slight OC
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/265008 <- 950/1400, temps reached 94C during the benchmark... won't be doing more before repaste.
AMD Radeon HD 7970M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2670QM Processor,CLEVO P150HMx score: P6717 3DMarks <- 3dMark11
-
You must repaste buddy with ic diamond which i had-and when i was oc the card at 1030/1560 the max i reach was 81-83c-not 94c with that oc???
Dont run any other bench untill you repaste it....be carefull.....
-
don't worry buddy, I'm not doing anything GPU intensive with the lappy at the moment (no time) so I'll be able to wait till I have a proper paste installed.
-
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
That looks about right for stock
-
It would be interesting to see some 7970Mx2 CF results, anyone has posted any? I have browsed a lot and found non.
-
Take a look at the bench from vss at the hardwareluxx forum:
Luna p370 em - Seite 9 -
AMD Radeon HD 7970M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2670QM Processor,CLEVO P150HMx
Closing in on the 5k mark. -
give that 7970m a run for its money buddy
u could deff up the mem to 1450 or even 1500. also give the core another 10-20 mhz.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Very nice.... for a 7970M
It does show how worth it upgrading the HM series is. -
Yeah it does
I only lose to the ivy machines because I have the weakest cpu of the i7 lineup. -
We now need a bench of the same rig with a 680M to properly compare, i have only seen monster CPU benchmarks (with OC 680s).
heres my OC 3dmark btw, 950/1450, I am not able to get stable perf with higher OCs, any idea? I use MSIAB, but only see the core and mem sliders, the voltage are not movable, do i need to oc voltage to reach higher more stable values? -
Default Clocks @ p170HMx - Intel i7 2760QM and AMD 7970M
AMD Radeon HD 7970M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2760QM Processor,CLEVO P170HMx -
you could check if you core voltage under load is 1.000v or 1.050v. I'd imagine that could make the difference. Despite having 1.050v on mine the core won't take more than 1ghz (tested with stock memory, didn't matter) fully stable in games. But I'm happy anyways.
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
The 7970M does seem VERY sensitive to the power delivery system on the motherboard, have you tried maybe 1.025V as a middle ground?
-
but it looks a bit low for "not enduro affected" overvoltable 7970m or?
even whit my "enduro affected" (never seen it by me, but if all say it a have to believe in it) EM-model i can get 300 gpu-points more (see my signature) -
its cuz he has the second-weakest cpu of the sandy bridge line-up. its holding the 7970m back a bit.
and dayum, i still havent manage to break 8k in 3dmark11, even with that monster OC on my cpu *sigh* -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
-
show-off
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
*flutters eyelashes* "Me? Surely you jest!"
*cough*
Gotta love bandwidth
*cough* -
u should better get that cough checked out before someone steals ur laptop!
-
Now that's a nice score there Meaker.
Edit
So I decided to run one real quick At a bit lower than yours. 1145/1325
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3940XM,Alienware M18xR2 score: X2970 3DMarks
And going by this score. Both cards are dead even in extreme. -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
True, 3dmark firestrike extreme kicks the mostly of the shaders still, how about a little 3dmark11 extreme?
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3940XM,Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-16F3 score: X3142 3DMarks -
hummm, this one was ran last month.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3940XM,Alienware M18xR2 score: X3104 3DMarks -
That´s fun to watch
.
* runs to get some popcorn*
-
Hey Meaker what vbios(volt) you have for such big clocks???
this is nuts!!!
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
1.087V with a pencil mod applied to the memory.
-
And here is 3dmark11 X ran at 1145/1300
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3940XM,Alienware M18xR2 score: X3230 3DMarks
So it's pretty safe to say that running higher memory is not always a better thing. (Higher than what is needed, rather) -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
My score goes lower than yours though when I drop my memory clock to the same level so I still think I am paying a slight optimus tax.
-
1.087v??Where did you find this vbios??
My brother knows this way(pencil mod)but its very dangerous. -
-
What core and mem clock you used to get that P5537 score? I dont seem to be able to go over 950/1450 stable OC with MSI. Do you move only the mem and core sliders or are you doing something elese?
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Yes but I actually have a core that will use it
-
i wish i would be able to overvolt and use custom vbios too
1055/1550 core/mem -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
1055/1550 is pretty good for a 7970M anyway to be fair.
-
For some reason if i go higher than 980 core my lappy BSODS or the least crashes when running kombustor or 3dmark11. highest so far has been 980/1450:
but i am truly afraid to fry my card if i keep trying. -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
I used the data sheet for the chip, used the equation it gave to work out the values I needed and a multimeter to check values.
Sure if you just shade away and guess it is dangerous, but with understanding and care it can be done safely.
There is a good reason I have not shared where exactly the chip and resistor is because if you are capable of doing it safely you should be able to work it out. -
yes i know, but if overvolted i was maybe able to get 1100 on core
i get BSOD first if i go higher than 1060 on core or 1600 on mem. on 1055-1060 core / 1550-1600 mem i get always "driver stop working" error -
Being the same card i can only think of an electrical or power source issue, because you have a bigger rig (the p170). Anyone with P150EM can post its higher OC values? highest stable for me has been 950/1450, the 980/1450 crashed 3dmark (no BSOD tho).
I think i would need to mod the volts somehow to get higher OC, probably wont try, happy with my stock values. -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
It can be down to individual sample quality too as you get to these levels.
-
i believe those gold cards (oc to over 1ghz without ov) are from the same printing machine or same factory with newer or more accurate machines.
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
More likey they are from the centre of the wafer.
-
so you are sayimg i should not try more? how could i overvolt or its not recommendable?
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Over volting can be done through flashing an edited vbios (can be found over at tech inferno forums), you are not in any significant danger for a small jump like 1.05V to 1.075V.
-
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-3840QM,CLEVO P370EM
See Signature for Specs. -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
A nice score, do you plan on tweaking at all or it going to remain that way?
Also that's a very interesting arrangement of SSDs you have there.... -
Thank you!
Yeah, I'm going to spend the night tweaking it and seeing what scores I get.
I'm a fan of the Plextor SSDs. They get great reviews and I've never heard a bad thing about them from anyone. I may even swap out the Crucial mSATA for the new 256GB M5M Plextor just came out with. -
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Just be aware only 2 ports are SATA III so if you raid with one on a SATA II port any in the array will run at SATA II speeds.
3DMark Released
Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by MrDJ, Feb 4, 2013.
