The Notebook Review forums were hosted by TechTarget, who shut down them down on January 31, 2022. This static read-only archive was pulled by NBR forum users between January 20 and January 31, 2022, in an effort to make sure that the valuable technical information that had been posted on the forums is preserved. For current discussions, many NBR forum users moved over to NotebookTalk.net after the shutdown.
Problems? See this thread at archive.org.
← Previous page

    3DMark Released

    Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by MrDJ, Feb 4, 2013.

  1. VSSS

    VSSS Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    133
    Messages:
    245
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    31
  2. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,426
    Messages:
    58,171
    Likes Received:
    17,882
    Trophy Points:
    931
    MMM tasty brute force approach VSSS, that is a very nice system you have there, what temps were you seeing?
     
  3. VSSS

    VSSS Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    133
    Messages:
    245
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    31
    temperatures are very cool in my system,
    Fumark OEM Seting
    [​IMG]
     
  4. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,426
    Messages:
    58,171
    Likes Received:
    17,882
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Well those cards have not finished raising in temperature but it looks like it will level around 100C which is not bad for furmark.
     
  5. Tirenz

    Tirenz Notebook Evangelist

    Reputations:
    735
    Messages:
    651
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Very nice scores, vss! :)
    It seems that your temps seem to be a lot better than most of the crossfire P370em users that are reporting high temps on the P370em...
    I think I remember reading something about some mods in the hardwareluxx forum, is that right?
     
  6. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,426
    Messages:
    58,171
    Likes Received:
    17,882
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Well part of it is just making sure the paste job is good and the heatsink is making proper contact with the card. I think the worst temps were reported with ES cards too.
     
  7. VSSS

    VSSS Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    133
    Messages:
    245
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    31
    hi,
    so this is the prototype of a new cooling, HWL (VSS) NBR (VSSS) is my username

    I bought my set in HawkForce and graphic cards are the same as any other chip OEM, not ES!


    edit

    single card
    [​IMG]

    sorry for the spam

    OEM Cooling
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    witch Tape Mod
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    new Cooling (prototype)
    [​IMG]

    heaven benchmark 30min 900@1200
    [​IMG]
     
  8. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,426
    Messages:
    58,171
    Likes Received:
    17,882
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I was not suggesting yours was, just that the first people were reporting temps in the P370EM were.
     
  9. VSSS

    VSSS Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    133
    Messages:
    245
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    31
    my serial number is P370 xxxxx20, say that I am one of the first users in the P370 CrossFire, the Crossfire today all have the same temperature as my P370 with OEM Heatsinks
     
  10. VSSS

    VSSS Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    133
    Messages:
    245
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    31
    new Single GPU score
    [​IMG]
     
  11. M3ezu

    M3ezu Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    3
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
  12. jaybee83

    jaybee83 Biotech-Doc

    Reputations:
    4,125
    Messages:
    11,571
    Likes Received:
    9,148
    Trophy Points:
    931
    huh weird...how much of an improvement did u see score- and clock-wise?

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
     
  13. M3ezu

    M3ezu Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    3
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    the core is stable 10mhz higher (lulz) and I saw a lot more consistent GPU usage in the range of 98-100% instead of 90-97% with periodic drops to lower levels. 3dmark improvement was in the range of roughly 100 points, so not much. I've ran Crysis 3 for the past hour and the GPU usage seems to stick to full, framerate is consistent with no sudden/weird drops, seems to work better for my system. I'd imagine either I don't have the best PSU or the power regulators for the GPU ain't the best.
     
  14. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,426
    Messages:
    58,171
    Likes Received:
    17,882
    Trophy Points:
    931
    I forget what kind of clock steps the 7970M has, the 680M is 13.2mhz ish, what jumps does the 7970M see?
     
  15. jaybee83

    jaybee83 Biotech-Doc

    Reputations:
    4,125
    Messages:
    11,571
    Likes Received:
    9,148
    Trophy Points:
    931
    what do u mean by clock steps? the inervalls in which u can set the core clocks?

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
     
  16. Meaker@Sager

    Meaker@Sager Company Representative

    Reputations:
    9,426
    Messages:
    58,171
    Likes Received:
    17,882
    Trophy Points:
    931
    Yes, if you set 992mhz the clocks go to 980mhz, but if you set 993mhz the clocks are set to 993mhz, if you set 1005mhz the clocks go to 993mhz while if you set 1006mhz they go to 1006mhz etc.
     
  17. jaybee83

    jaybee83 Biotech-Doc

    Reputations:
    4,125
    Messages:
    11,571
    Likes Received:
    9,148
    Trophy Points:
    931
    as far as ive seen the clocks are pretty exact when it comes to the 7970m. just minute differences below 1mhz as reported by gpu-z.

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
     
  18. M3ezu

    M3ezu Notebook Consultant

    Reputations:
    3
    Messages:
    122
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    Mhm, I'm not sure if that 1.025V worked anymore. Can't seem to get the voltage to drop back to it via software methods anymore. (i thought I checked that it dropped to 1.025 before but I don't feel sure anymore) 1.075V works via software but when I tried it yesterday it cause erratic gpu utilization.
     
← Previous page