i agree, GTX285M will most likely be a die shrink of the aging G92b core, possibly with DX10.1 support, and not likely to have GDDR5 because G92b is just tooooo old to support GDDR5 (correct me if im wrong). GT300M will likely be the new GT200 core.
-
-
Sheer taunting I guess
-
All I have to say is finally!
But until they are out we can only speculate on performance and architecture.
Glad I didn't order a new CLEVO gonna have to wait for the new GPU's now..lol -
will this fit into my 9262? it better ...
-
All these new cards are going to be MxM3.0 .. Your machine is MxM2.1 so sadly no they wont..
-
Well I ordered a W860CU, and after 4 years of my present laptop I'm not going to wait god knows how long for an incremental increase to my soon to arrive GTX280m.
In a year or year and a half, I'll scoop whatever card is mxm3.0 compliant and upgrade then.
But considering how any game will run on my gtx280m for at least a couple years to come, I'll be damned if I'm going to keep waiting for every new thing on the horizon.
/rant -
I thought it was MXM IV and they are backwards compatible with MXM 3.0b?
-
I posted a thread on this topic some days ago ...
now the question is how soon will it debut ???
meaning should i go ahead to get a new sager setup now ???
or wait ???
how much will 1 item of the GT300M on itself costs ?
-
Now I remember an article a while back about nVidia attempting the G92b die shrink to 40nm and had disastrous results, dropping the project altogether. Perhaps a G92b dieshrink is not what the GTX 285m will have...
-
Megacharge Custom User Title
MXM IV belongs to the 2.1 family, MXM 2.1 type III IV HE etc, are all MXM 2.1 and are different than MXM 3.0a/b. No MXM 2.1 cards are backwards compatible with MXM 3.0 a or b. -
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
So is it worth waiting for that time before buying the W860CU? It will be officially announced after Black Friday and when approximately would be the release then? -
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
My guess is just as good as anyone else in this thread right now. Whether or not the GTX 285M will be 55nm or 40nm, it will still be a G92, and that is all the reason I need for waiting on the final itteration of the G92 architecture. In about a day, the G92 will have it's two year birthday since launching on October 29, 2007 as the 8800 GT.
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
Ok. Is the GTX280M a G92 architecture with a 55nm die?
So in all angles, the 285M would be a tad better than the 280M because of its 40nm die? -
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
No, it's going to be worse. Smaller transistors means less performance, thus you should stay away from it from all costs.
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
Gotcha, lol..
-
Megacharge Custom User Title
Just checked the UK site to see if they were at least still listed there, and they are still listed there.
http://www.nvidia.co.uk/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-uk
EDIT: They took the UK ones down now. -
as a measure of how much the GTX300M will cost ...
does anyone know how much a GTX280M costs ???
thanks
Sparky894 -
correct me if im wrong, i thought smaller transistor means higher performance? (higher frequency, less heat, less current leakage, higher density, etc)
-
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
@alexnvidia
You're right about that. Sov Sun was being sarcastic, lol.. -
$490, but if the 300M series has a smaller die size, it should cost less.
-
right, i thought so.. lol!
-
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
-
Wow I've had my 8800 GT now for two years...Happy Birthday
Where'd those years go. Hum... my 8800 GTX is coming up on 3 years...what the heck! I should be upgrading, spending lots of money on new video cards and new systems but my C2Ds (E6750, X6800 EE) run fine.
IMO - 285M is just gonna be a G92 die shrink and they will charge what the do for the 280M's if not more. Will the 300's be DX11, G92 die shrinks, Lots of speculation. -
I think the 300M is a 40nm dieshrink of current 55nm cards.
The 285M is just a higher clocked card, just like 7900 GTX and 7950 GTX, this is what I am speculating at this moment. If the 285M was such a great improvement they would call it 290M or 295M or something much more cool. -
Soviet Sunrise Notebook Prophet
Agreed. My expectations are no more than a clock hike with handpicked cards.
-
These will only come in MXM 3.0, so no chance seeing MXM 2.1 Type IV?
-
None ... unless some other manufacturers like Asus or Acer who might still use 2.1 decide to use them.
-
Going to go with the 285M being an overclocked 55nm core... maybe with GDDR5....which might be the reason why it doesn't get a 300 model number. It looks like it's meant as a stop gap GPU vs. the Mobility 4870 but it's so late in the game at this point why bother.
The 300M will almost certainly be rebadges of the 40nm low-scale G200 architecture. Fermi's massive size and general processing disposition isn't "mobile-ready". -
I'm with Phinagle, in thinking that 300M will be G200 chips. No way Nvidia bothers with 40nm G92 chips.
Of course 285M will be a bumped 280M, maybe nearing 9800 GTX. -
kevindd992002 Notebook Virtuoso
Ah. So 285M will still be 55nm? Just higher clocks?
-
i dont see why GTX285M wont get a 40nm die shrink, assuming it's still a rebadged G92b core. for starters, GTX280M is already on a whopping 75W thermal envelope on 55nm. If they decide to increase the clock speed further, that will bring the power requirement over the roof! but then again, it's such an old core, investing further in a die shrink will not be economically plausible. the real question is, why even bother upgrading GT200M line when they can do better with GT300M (based on GT200 core)?
-
Honestly for all we know the GTX285M may not even come out. For what we have to go on the GTX285M may just as easily be vaporware...something Nvidia had plans to produce but never gets released. It's blip that popped up on the driver page may be all we see of the GPU.
-
Blip...Pooofff lol
-
Does ATI/AMD have any cards that fit the 5797? Or are there's totally different connection?
-
Mobility 4870 , 3850 , 3870 as long as you use the MXM 2.1 models.
-
I'm assuming the likelihood of another mxm2.1 card that is an upgrade to the 260m / 280m line ...maybe smaller die, uses less power, etc...is slim to none?
-
Looking at it, Mobility HD4870 is not better than my 9800GT. But good to know it's there.
I'm curious to see what ATI is doing with mobiles. They've pulled ahead in desktops lately, but would be nice to see them do the same on the mobile front. -
More close to none than to slim. Sorry, unless Clevo or Alienware or whatever other notebook manufacturer decides to sell MXM cards just like desktop video cards, we are not gonna see any other new cards for 2.1, better than the current 280M.
But who knows, with the latest surge in sales for stand alone GTX 280M. Clevo might just as well decide to give this market a chance. -
I'm not putting off my purchase. If a 2 year old 8800 GT is still doing fine, then I would hope the 280 will still be chugging along OK in another 2 years. I replace the laptops ~ every 2 years anyway, so I don't feel waiting another 2-3 months is going to yield much benefit, at least to me.
This site is great, but it's very easy to get caught up in the "OMG the XXX is coming out in 2 months that's going to be so much better than the YYY that came out last week" mentality. -
I know
)
-
i feel you, the horrors of ever advancing technology. waiting can only lead no nothing, because by the time something is just available to the market, something even better gets cooked up.
-
I called my vendor "mySN" today, asking for nV 300m series, have to wait for Feb. -March 2010 maybe late Jan.
will see and wait! -
finally, some positive indication. late jan is just 3 months away.
-
Larry@LPC-Digital Company Representative
If you buy a NP8690 or NP8760 you will be fine for a while. With the latest PM55 Chipset, the i7, and an almost certainty of being able to upgrade the GPU in a few months, you'll be in the game for longer than you may think
-
You will be crazy holding off an order for something over pure speculation. With solid proof and a better time frame then a valid point can be made to wait some more on the new best thing. Honestly, I think Nvidia got something up their sleeves with the new GT300M cards but who knows..but before all that a beefed up G92 core 285m-295m gtx be released just to notch it up a little to hang in with the competition. Again, all pure speculation.
-
Taken down from UK site now.. looks like screen shots and speculations are all we have.. for now..
-
Hi I am thinking of buying the Sager NP9850 and will this system with the dual m280 SLI be support as well?
-
ok so why can't there be one mxm slot for laptops? desktops use only one type of PCI-E slot. I dont get the idea of having: mxm2.0, mxm2.1, mxm2.1B, mxm3.0, mxm3.0b, mxm3.0c, mxm3.0W/T/F, mxm3GTFO, mxm007, mxmScrewNvidia slots for laptops. why cant there only be one proper mxm slot so all the cards are compatible?
-
LOL then there wouldn't be as much profits for the ugly capitalist pigs hehehehe.
Don't get me wrong...I'm mildy pissed "they" came out with the np8690 less than 6 months after the 8662. I bought a highend 8662 when i should've waited for the 15.6 incher.
i7 and mxm3.0...mf'ers are always looking for the quick buck. -
I really doubt the GTX 285M will be a 40nm G92. Why would nVidia reengineer the G92 for 40nm when they have already have GT200 @ 40nm? The GTX 285M might be a G92 part but it won't be 40nm if it is.
GT300M on NVIDIA's WEBSITE!
Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by alexnvidia, Oct 27, 2009.