Clevo Overclocker's Lounge

Maybe Nvidia already have started the work with <Volta>?

 

Am I missing something or is that GTX 1080 desktop Graphics score not that much more than the 24350 score of @GTVEVO on his P870DM 2 x 980m SLI...
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/7333219

Is that GTX 1080 stock settings?

 

wow 4.8 @ > 1.4v with max <70C temp?
Are you using water cool?

 

@hmscott your first link is for 3dmark11, not firestrike. For 3dmark11 graphics only score is about 33k to 34k.

Those FS graphics scores are with a single DT GTX 1080 @ ~2050MHz and an i7-4700MQ. OC'd and not stock.

 

Hint, the May bench is not using 980s...

 

Could be the 1080m? ;-)

 

Fixed it

Would you please do/post a 3dmark11 run on the GTX 1080 to compare against these GX800VH 2 x 980 SLI scores, with highest Graphics score of 38595? Thank you
http://www.3dmark.com/compare/3dm11/11108327/3dm11/11241548/3dm11/11108109#

 

It's got a different vbios...

Doesn't seem high enough still... I thought it was the OC run... maybe it's...

 

Nope, no need for that when benching while living in friggin' cold Norway!

 

No. Only my mod U3 + Liquid ultra

A modded AC bench would probably make wonders

 

What do you think, guys?

More info found here: http://wccftech.com/geforce-gtx-1080-gpu-for-notebooks-specifications-leaked/

 

Holy what the fadooosh.?

 

Wow, is this faster than the desktop 980? How about the notebook 1080?

 

What the heck

 

Here's this... kind of interesting to look at. This is basically 200W 980 on MXM performance.

 

Ooops. Forgot to update AIDA64 Sensor Panel. The GPU label has to be manually typed in.

Steam certainly dreams up some strange things to award as unlocked achievements sometimes.

 

Here you go. I have also included the new MSI notebook with 6820k. Note that it is using GDDR5X but showing 3GB and scores 48k with SLI. Prototype maybe and/or buggy 3dmark version.

http://www.3dmark.com/compare/3dm11/11310952/3dm11/11241548/3dm11/11298029#

 

Brings a tear to my eye...

Almost there, they didn't OC the CPU enough - that June 3rd run with a 48,019 Graphics score, it's like... Magic

I wonder if that is a stock run, or a mild OC... I was thinking SLI 1080 might hit 3dmark11 50-60k Graphics score

 

Nice to see some competition.

 

So, I have my gtx 980 overclocked to 250/250mhz +50mv and Witcher 3 is running really well on max settings, however I have noticed that the gpu temps are sitting around 90c. What are your thoughts about gaming for extended periods at that temperature?

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

 

Yeah..., The damn BGA ting ruining the total score

 

That's ok, if it can bring a GPU score like that, I'll allow it

 

As I said Bga and Sli. No thanks http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/geforce_gtx_1080_2_way_sli_review,20.html

 

"Processor power then. We use a X99 / Core i7 5960X Extreme processor clocked at 4400 MHz. With multi-GPU gaming these faster clocked 6-core puppies do show an increase in performance.

You do need to wonder though if the 10~15% performance increase in lower resolutions really justifies that money, but obviously if you can afford two cards in SLI, you probably will go for the best and fastest infrastructure as well.

That would be X99 with a nice 6 or 8 or more recent 10-core processor."

With a nice big showy case, multiple water cooling loops, 1500w+ power supply, a bunch of nice big swooshy fans, and all the things that can be fit into several cubic yards of desktop computer

We haven't got the technology yet to fit all that into a nice svelte 18" screened laptop. Someday

 

Nope, I'm right there with you. It will NEVER, EVER be OK... period. Don't care what it's got for GPU(s) or how powerful they might be, BGA CPU or GPU will always be a deal killer. If Clevo stops selling notebooks with socketed desktop CPUs and Intel does not go back to offering socketed mobile Extreme CPUs I will never purchase another so-called 'high performance' laptop for the rest of my life. I won't put up with trash like that in my house. If I have to buy trash, it will be something cheap and disposable because that's all BGA is good for. It goes way beyond performance. Upgradability, repairability and serviceability and being able to swap out poorly binned chips for good ones matters a ton.

 

We have the technology to fit in a proper desktop processor TODAY Even with a very nice OC This in 17" machine

 

Yup, not to mention, buying BGA trash funds the ongoing delinquency of Intel and empowers them to shaft us all with their garbage. We need to cut off their funding and make financial solvency mission-critical for them. If they cannot sell BGA trash, they'll get their act together again and do the right thing for notebook enthusiasts.

 

Yeah..., All correct
Yo said never in my house in previous post... See under my avatar and take a look at my location

 

Did you guys ever wonder how the other side of the 'red-orb' that the Fox is entwined around looks like?



You already know the "Fox", now say hello to the "MR.":

Spoiler

 

Auf den Punkt getroffen, ha ha!

 

um, hello, elephant in the room?! how the HECK does fox already have a friggin' 1080M?! more details and benches please!

Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 NXT-AL10

 

Wow, holy!!
Is 1080m a mxm 3.0b card? You think it would be physically compatible with older laptops?

 

Ohne die URL zu lesen , sprang sie auf Schlussfolgerungen

Mein Beitrag neu geschrieben mit den Rohlingen aus der URL ausgefüllt.

 

Icksnay on the NDA, Eh?

 

Now, that sounds cryptic/scary!

 

It's easier to understand if you read it, the original post and URL content:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/threads/clevo-overclockers-lounge.788975/page-311#post-10273161

 

Now you provided the Rosetta Stone to me!

Back to topic! If @Mr. Fox has indeed a 1080m running in his Phoenix, then there is hope my Panther might roar a lil'bit longer!

 

+1

standard form factor please!

in any case, P870DM owners will rejoice, seeing as the 1080M is indeed compatible with their machines

Sent from my Huawei Mate 8 NXT-AL10

 

True it's compatible, but will the cost of the card justifiable ?
I mean I would rather get a Razer core and non reference 1080 for that price and the performance will be on par.
But it all depends on TB3 eGPU support.
@Prema have you had the chance or any info if the BIOS, has decent support ?

 

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8701156

Looks like there may be hope for the masses.... Maybe

Edit:
It's a fail. @Mr. Fox has dashed my hopes.

 

I'll be working on that once/if I have actual hardware to do so...

 

NICE!

I saw another thread where the AGA scores were getting capped around 14k ish with an external display. How is this one doing so well ?

 

*reads post, looks at sig, shakes head in bewilderment*

 

Hue hue ?

No but honestly, wont it be better than spending 1 k - 1.5k on just a card , to get a external setup that can be fiddled around easily?

I mean the main thing i hate about the 980 in my system is not being able to adequately cool it at higher clocks. With an eGPU i can even go Hybrid. (Though yes, high clocks might not change much because of the limited bandwidth).

 

Not looking at being capped at the moment...More interested in...
Motherboard
Alienware 17 R3


That's a standard socket if im not mistaken. The R3 doesn't have an extra power plug....Or does it now?

 

Damn im confused. Is that a MXM card!?
And by capped i meant, they were going over that mark by much.
I figured that score was with the 1080 through the AGA.

 

Nope, that is all BGA crap... no sockets and slots, so it is a totally emasculated dead-end/throw-away turdbook.

 

Alienware does not do sockets and slots any more. And, the 6820HK is a very mediocre 45W TDP BGA one-shot wonder.

http://ark.intel.com/products/88969/Intel-Core-i7-6820HK-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-3_60-GHz

 

Ah, so i see.....

If that cost like 1k then i'm all in. I can afford to upgrade every year for 1k.

Really only need it for 30 days then they can have it back.