When I had my quad @2.53 it had 2-3 FPS lower scores than 2.93. Basically, this is not that CPU dependent and Mandrake's scores are about 5-10FPS better than mine.
-
-
Vicious's best score:
Scene1: 136.52 fps
Scene2: 95.75 fps
Scene3: 158.01 fps
Scene4: 100.31 fps
Mandrake's first score:
Scene1: 136.71 fps
Scene2: 97.71 fps
Scene3: 152.98 fps
Scene4: 104.81 fps
Who is behind whom? -
-
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
-
those w90 scores are the highest it gets and not sure if it was a stable system.
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
becaues ati focused on aa for the 4 series. it wins at 8aa and 2aa. 2aa actually inproves performance.
-
It can't OC much, but it still can OC. You have to up the voltage to get a OC worth anything -
No AA....
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
yeah i know it's at it's max but i'm not sure the stock clocks but i think the overclock is 680/1700/1000. that's maybe just straight benchmark and is not stable. but i know the 4870 is 550/850 and overdrive is 600/900. and then with vic's guide i think it's 700/950 is i am not mistaken. so one can correct me if i am wrong.
-
-
My No AA scores:
Scene1: 180.82 fps
Scene2: 133.48 fps
Scene3: 215.60 fps
Scene4: 131.85 fps -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/526/devilmaycry4trialdx1020qw0.jpg -
-
Beating one of the best dekstop GPUs out there. WOW!!!
-
As for the AA argument, ATi has often dominated nVidia in this department (minus a few games). Here's a link/test which illustrates this:
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/sapphire_toxic_4850_dual_slot_review/default.asp -
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
the highest i pushed my 9800m gtx is 670/1670/950. i haven't really tried to much higher since i don't have a cooler and sli but i haven't broke 80c yet.
-
bibsybob
no, the 4870's still have the record for 8x/4x.
but this was one of his regular runs with the same settings...
dmc4 demo benchmark at 1920x1080, everything set to super high, AA 8x, dx10, and got these results:
<o>> </o>
>
Scene1: 136.52 fps
Scene2: 95.75 fps
Scene3: 158.01 fps
Scene4: 100.31 fps -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
everything looks even OC'd 9800m gtx, stock 4870, 280m stock for dmc4 at 8aa. can everyone agree unless we can get overclocked results for he 280m.
-
Mandrake can we get a screen shot of Crysis benchmark to prove to some people
-
Like I said a while ago, 9800GTX/4850/4870/260/280 are all in the same category, and it's relatively meaningless trying to make a competition of it. The mere fact that they are all so close is the most interesting part of this comparison... but if you have to know, hang up the towel and give it to the sli 280M, and wait for a real improvement in 2010.
And yes, I do find it hard to believe someone got 33 FPS @ DX10 Very High, WUXGA, stock GPU clocks. Call me pessimistic, but that's kind of impossible. -
I am thinking about gatting one of these, but performance dosent seem to be a great leap from 9800, anyway when are the ATI chips coming out? And are the ATI chips based off of the real 4000 series? I would imagine if they were that they would walk all over the 280.
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
the clock speeds are to low to perform higher then them. it is dead even.
-
-
yeah Ive been hearing a mixture on the 4870's for the M17x. Is it going to be GDDR5? 1GB VRAM? Higher clocks than the Asus W90?
also we need more people to post benchmarks! I want to see the difference in Crysis between SLI 260 and 280. -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
i'm not comparing the gddr5 because it's not released. i'm comparing 9800m gtx overclocked, 280m, 260m, and 4850(msi), 4870(asus 4850).
it's going to be 1-5fps second. overclocked i got 15fps, another geek got believe 18fps. and just add sli numbers to it. -
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
it's not to far off. if he bring it up the only thing he will lose is scene 3 which is shaders.
-
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
yeah it is small. i'm using orca browser to zoom in on the picture and it's still blurry
-
-
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
yes much better thanks.
-
could you plz run the same with very high details please
-
-
hm do you mean to run in very high mode? i change my settings directly in the game options on very high and run the benchmark gpu bat(or exe) in the crysis director. i didnt use the other crysis benchmark tool.
-
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
this is what you do. you run the game and change your settings, then you use the benchmarking tool. the setting on the benchmarking tool doesn't work except for the res, dx9,dx10 and 64bit. the shadows,textures, etc won't change unless you change it in the game.
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
can someone try this. i don't think it applies to the m17x since you can disable the 9400m in the bios
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showpost.php?p=5012414&postcount=1429 -
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
i'm not sure with aa on or off. but no all you have to do is open the game, change your settings and then appy it. then you can exit it and then run the benchmarking tool.
just keep the settings on the benchmarking tool the same as the game so you don't get confused of your settings.
regarding aa however, i would change it in the game just to be sure.
also motion blur isn't in the benchamarking so make you have it on the same settings also.
i notice with the patches (motion blur) you willl get a big performance hit. so can you tell us what version of crysis are you running? -
The graphics go so fast it's not easy to monitor. Changing to high settings in the game and turning on AA or leaving it off doesn't affect the numbers I'm getting. Still averaging 33 and maxing at 55. I'm up to patch 1.2.1.
Edit: I'll try to take a video of it tonight when there isn't so much glare. -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
i stand corrected as i just set everything to very high in crysis and then i set the benchmarking tool to high and got
6/27/2009 12:45:24 PM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1920x1080, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=2, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: VeryHigh
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 153.88s, Average FPS: 13.00
Min FPS: 9.53 at frame 1950, Max FPS: 15.31 at frame 998
Average Tri/Sec: -3986710, Tri/Frame: -306736
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -2.99
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 150.46s, Average FPS: 13.29
Min FPS: 9.53 at frame 1950, Max FPS: 15.47 at frame 988
Average Tri/Sec: -3881773, Tri/Frame: -292028
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -3.14
TimeDemo Play Ended, (2 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Completed All Tests
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
6/27/2009 12:45:24 PM - Vista 64
Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: VeryHigh ~~ Last Average FPS: 13.29
high specs stocked
6/27/2009 12:51:49 PM - Vista 64
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1920x1080, AA=No AA, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=2, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: High
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished.
Play Time: 95.03s, Average FPS: 21.05
Min FPS: 15.86 at frame 1951, Max FPS: 26.49 at frame 990
Average Tri/Sec: -18272626, Tri/Frame: -868198
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.06
!TimeDemo Run 1 Finished.
Play Time: 90.49s, Average FPS: 22.10
Min FPS: 15.86 at frame 1951, Max FPS: 27.12 at frame 1000
Average Tri/Sec: -18915258, Tri/Frame: -855818
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.07
TimeDemo Play Ended, (2 Runs Performed)
==============================================================
Completed All Tests
<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>
6/27/2009 12:51:49 PM - Vista 64
Run #1- DX10 1920x1080 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Last Average FPS: 22.10
but i know in my whitebook when i did this, it wouldn't work unless i changed it in the game first. i am 1000% sure of this and that's why i always did it. i may have forgotten to install a framework or something
btw everything is stocked. -
Do you always run it with 2 loops? I've been running all my tests at 1920x1080 based on recommendations here.
I'm running Vantage right now @ default settings. -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
oh yeah my bad i should also run 1920*1080. i'll do that and replace what i have.
i run 2 test because i don't feel like running 3 and 1 is not enough. anything can change while benchmarking. (windows update starts for no reason, antivirus decides to scan because it wants to annoy you. you get me?) -
I'll try the Crysis benchmark with 3 loops. -
First run...
-
M17x Benchmarks thread !!!
Discussion in 'Alienware' started by The_Moo?, Jun 22, 2009.