Well, I got my E8435 back after RMAing my Asus W90 and ran some tests (testing some custom drivers I'm working on). Haven't been on much, because in the meantime, I was working on my HTPC. Nonetheless, I posted my H score on orb, and my P score didn't change much so I left it as is. But when I ran on Extreme mode (I had to lower it to 1920x1080, so it's not official), I'm getting higher scores than my H score on the W90. Any of you guys experiencing this with the M17x/NVidia cards?
-
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
WHAMMY! CAUGHT UP! (god how I wish I had you by 1 point though haha)
P12193
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1381909
GPU: 11996
CPU: 12824 -
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
So I had the SLI status thing running during the magical run haha
Does the amount that is filled vertically represent the GPU utilization? Because if it does, Vantage could use it better(still MUCH better than 06 was though)
-
Alright somebody throw up a high 280 single imma be bored over the weekend ...
-
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
haha moo, I gotta use my time wisely, as college is siphoning it all away
Look to the clevo users with a single GTX280m as your competition maybe?
As a side note, which SLI mode is best for 3DMark06 and Vantage? -
I can't because they can use the vantage king driver
-
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
vantage king driver?
Which would that be? Dox? (it does work nice, got me my score)
-
185 from my understanding ....
I heard 179 was good to ... -
well look at scook9. just a movin' on up...ain't cha!
nice work!
, them 4870's are making a move these days. so what did you get when you ran the whole test.? (test 1 through 4)
4870's look to be still in the game mandrake...but wont know for sure till a whole run is completed.
also, has anyone seen or ran any current test on the 9800m gtx lately? curious as to if they gained any small improvements with newer drivers.. -
Ok, I know there are threads for this one but wanted to know if anyone else has had this problem recently. I am finishing up my review of my M17x and am almost finished except for one thing, I need one last run of benches. 3d Mark and Vantage are both responding with the blasted COM Surrogate error and I can't get it to go away. I have gone to through the posts here, Microsoft forums, and others (even the thinkgeek post) and none of the suggested fixes have yielded positive results.
Just looking for any suggestions from anyone else that has encountered this error recently. Any suggestions would be appreciated and sorry for getting off topic. -
hmm i need to get back to clocking again I been slacking
hmm those v mods that your using scook they exclusive to the 17x? can you still do a windows flash on those cards or is it a usb thumbstick jobbie?
Might consider upping the V's on mine for abit higher score -
Did you use the Dox 182.46 drivers?
-
these are my sscores....
how are they?
-
I have tried that a few times but I will try it again in the morn. Reset everything to default but still no luck. I will work on it more tomorrow, almost 4 here on the West coast.
-
-
-
hey moo, how is my score now?
does it fall in the average or high? -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
You gpu score is good if you are stock.
Turn physx off and overclock your cpu and run some stuff.
Scook9
Your almost there. -
sh*t mandrake! how are your scores so damn high? -
I've got it on along with SLI at the moment but wondering if it would be better off? -
-
Last Run with new Memory @ 1066/FSB 1066 - 11.882 (see Sig.)
-
why has no one thrown up a single 280
-
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
physx artifically overinflates the CPU scores (as I am sure you can see) because it is giving the CPU credit for the PhysX load that your GPUs are doing. If you want to compare, turn off physx.
-
-
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
well if we are throwing up GPU scores, I got 11996
-
-
EDIT: Damn 182.46 runs very bad on my System. 190.40 is the only one for me. (For Vantage.) -
-
-
-
-
Are you noticing a difference in your benchmarks?
-
But I will test the next day even more. -
-
-
Should I leave it on in general except for benchmarks or is it pointless if the games isn't using PhysX? -
i use to leave mine on while playing...no change when i tested it back then. just as long as the game didn't have physics running.
-
-
Stock:
Seems a bit low to me. -
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
NEW RECORD FOR GPU AND OVERALL
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1383467
P12281
GPU: 12042
CPU: 13061 -
-
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
always glad to entertain!
Now that I got this taken care of, I can actually use my laptop like a normal person haha
Just had to get that benchmarking out of the way -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
Nice job scook. How do you feel?
-
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
excellent
Like I said, now I can rest a while lol
edit: actually, I need to get the 06 score up first, soon -
well, well, well...would you look at that there!
congratz scook9! -
glad to see all of your hard "work" finally pay off. are you using a single 4gb stick of ram or a kit?
-
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
2x2GB Kit
This should offer twice the bandwidth compared to a single stick as you can utilize the dual channel ability of the chipset -
the3vilGenius 3vil knows no fear
This the benchmark tests i got in the data provided by alienware. Is that a good score, not really familliar with these things
AWMark Score- 8334 AWMarks
Graphics Score- 9956 Points
CPU Score- 5598 Points
Graphics Test 1 - Jane Nash- 28 FPS
Graphics Test 2 - New Calico- 30 FPS
CPU Test 1 - AI Test- 749 Plans/S
CPU Test 2 - Physics- 8 Steps/S
Feature Test 1 - Texture Fill- 853 FPS
Feature Test 2 - Color Fill- 5 FPS
Feature Test 3 - POM- 22 FPS
Feature Test 4 - GPU Cloth- 17 FPS
Feature Test 5 - GPU Particles- 23 FPS
Feature Test 6 - Perlin Noise- 37 FPS -
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
assuming that AWMarks are Vantage score, that is pretty good
M17x Benchmarks thread !!!
Discussion in 'Alienware' started by The_Moo?, Jun 22, 2009.