*OFFICIAL* M17x Benchmarks RESULTS *Part 2*

lol that was a reply to your last vangate post!

heres some LN2 laptop style


edit: damnit, John beat me to it...does anyone remember the guy who did this on the Asus W90?

 

pic don't work

 

how well are the 4850's doing in the m17??...i might want to grab me one for playing purposes. till the dual 5800's come out/.

 

kinc, but he didn't use ln2...no one knows just exactly what he did...and he never told.

 

Looks like a notebook smoking a bong.

My bad.

 

Word on the street is that they are as good as the GTX 260m's in SLI which should be about the same as the 9800m GTX SLI was

 

now i can actually speak on a damn ccc. i feel good...lol
bring on the modding.

 

yea it was Kinc, who knows what he did..

heres some competition drake (kinc's score for 06)

 

he got alot of voltage going to that qx9300.....that aint a stock bios

 

i never get tired of that screen lol. the fsb is at 1664.2mhz. that's so high.

 

if only we could push that kind of voltage

 

Yeah I've seen that before. Weird that he wasn't talking about it. Probably combined a couple cpu-z screen shots with a desktop 3DMark06 score. If he doesn't want to give more info we can assume the worst.

 

highly unlikely, since he is a world record holder / over clocker for asus. but also "heavily connected to asus" so they probably opened his bios for him.

 

believe it was true but the cpu is what made the score over 20,000. 5900 on the cpu isn't easy. not even the gpu score are high is you look at it. they seem stock to 600/900 to me.

 

I'll keep trying...

 

I also noted the sm2/3 scores were not phenomenal, but that CPU score is pretty sick - as others have noted. I agree, he needs to pony up some better shots of it all

 

them gpu scores are high...who around here has one matching?...lol

now he also could have used that - lod bias thing to also further that score...(speculations of course)
like over at killernotebooks when they jumped out with some astronomical scores from nowhere...lmao! and none of them posted on orb...

 

So there's more details in the orb database? It's borderline false advertisement by Asus.

 

rolex if you can't do it, lets trade your cards for mines.

i'll check my whitebook, m17x and np9262 scores and see if the gpu are high. drake, john, can you do the same. i will pull up the w90 score as well. lets see if it was all just cpu that broke 20,000

 

well his SM3 were 500+ higher than Mandrakes and the SM3 was a little higher (less than 100)

 

we tried everything in the book to get him to tell us what he did... never did... so we just let that die...at the time...he was at 20k and the rest of us we're just coming up on on 17k.

what ever it was....it sold that many more w90's...that you can be fore sure.

 

You hear that Dell!! Give me a "special" over-volting bios and we'll get some of those sales numbers up.

 

lol yea i bet you'd like that! my benching days havent even begun, when will that QX9300 comeee..! (lol on a side note, how cool is the notion of a QX9500 being released) {not happening, we know that, aah well}

 

here's quadzilla's


here's my m17x with the dual core. with the gpu maxed out

nice with the gpu's stock and bring down the cpui clock
3.212ghz

3.2ghz

2.5ghz

2.0ghz

1.667ghz


my whitebook



by looking at these i would say the cpu at 3.9ghz pushed the gpu clocks.

 

I got that 3DMark06 score with my M17 already with my dual-core.

Edit: @don not John.

 

i couldn't find drakes 18.3 scores.....but you also gotta realize...he did that over 9 (estimation) months ago... that's a damn long time to hold a record. in this game...


damn don, i didn't remember him getting that 8657

 

Ya I was off by a few hundred on the SM2 as well, my bad haha

Here was my whitebook with QX9300 (and a low OC on it - was a gimpy CPU for the OC)

QX9300 @ 3018 MHz GPU OC
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11477225

QX9300 Stock GPU Stock
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11453910

P9500 @ 2816 MHz GPU Stock (also a poor OC'ing CPU)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11403100

P9500 stock GPU stock
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=11362333

 

you mean with my whitebook. that screenshot is old. that's complete stuttering. that cpu score at 3.2ghz is sooooo bad. and the stuttering affected the gpu scores as well. i have a screen shot of my at 3.2ghz and hitting 13,500 because of stuttering.

got it fixed but sold it after.

 

All my high benchmarks are neatly organized in the link in my sig. You just need to sign up.

 

if i did that for every time someone said look at this picture....i would be a millionaire now...lol (5 dollars for every signup)

 

lol! Then every time I have a new benchmark I'll just say "new benchmark added!" and you'll be left guessing.

 

nah... don would keep me in the loop.

 

some one needs to purchase those 4850's and run some benchmarks they probably about the same as the 4870's and i hope they end in good hands like mandrake quad sley0 or don.

 

yes...that would be nice to see.

 

don's over there negotiating with someone for the 4870s. They posted they regret buying ATI and don has swooped in to the rescue.

 

wow i hope he can get them

 

this is my 3rd run of vantage very close

 

Only a 1000 more points to go. Get the liquid nitrogen out!

 

and this is my 3rd run of 06

 

ROTFLMAO!!
that's my boi!

 

Hi everyone!

I have read a lot here about your benchmark and is amazing what you all score!

I have just one question. Where can I found a benchmark of 2 similar configuration of the alienware one with gtx280m SLI and one with 4870x2 crossfire??

Thank you a lot

 

Do you have a specific benchmark you are looking for? A lot of the benchmarks we've been posting are not stock.

 

I just want to understand which configuration is the best choise for games.

If you have a vantage or some games comparision will be great!
I think, from what I read, that ati is the best choise but I am not sure and I need some test to prove that

 

One more question:

Can I compare this benchmark?? I think is reporting something that is not the real power of a 4870s crossfire on th alienware

http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-4870-X2-Crossfire.14406.0.html
http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-280M-SLI.17191.0.html

 

go for the ati's they like 10% faster than the 280's

 

The ATI's are proving to be more powerful in the synthetic benchmarks. With the right drivers people are getting 11K GPU score out of the box. With the nVidia systems it's closer to 10.3K. OC'ed I hit 13K with my ATIs and Don hit 12.1K with his nVidia's.

As far as gaming bechmarks, nVidia edges out the ATI in Crysis and blows away the ATI in Devil May Cry 4. Resident Evil 5 and Street Fighter 4 are both better with ATI.

Hope that helps.

 

Too many variables involved to go by what they post. I scored 5K higher in 3DMark05 than they show.

edit: I have benchmarks organized in the thread in my sig.

 

Thank you for your reply. you confirmed me what I was thinking about the 2 configurations. Just some games are designed for ati and some for nvidia and ati's configuration is scoring more in futuremark benchs.

Thank you I will post my bench and I will try to post my OC's result too very soon.

cy

 

I think its updated correctly again. The edit button is back jeeeej