Awesome thermal design, but
1. doesnt it make notebook coolers redundant if its pulling air in from the front?
2. won't it be a pain to clean?
-
-
Any idea how long the battery will be able to last if you underclock the processor/full power saving? I'll be needing to run mine on battery from time to time (but plugged in for gaming of course).
-
-=$tR|k3r=- Notebook Virtuoso
Hey Drake,
From the rear, do you see a M17x'ish appearance in it's design, LOL!
-
Donald@Paladin44 Retired
Ok, so please don't shoot the messenger...BUT:
"G73JH-A1 has been removed from January price list, schedule delayed to February." -
-=$tR|k3r=- Notebook Virtuoso
I am betting you won't need a cooler!
-
did we crash the main forums for the ASUS part?
-
40-50min average browsing with save mofe/underclocked Asus built in mode
20-30min gaming
^ My guess only
official PR mostly is your battery life when Computer is at idle/save mode/brightness low/wifi off
-
-=$tR|k3r=- Notebook Virtuoso
No problem here..... I still got my pre-order in!
The longer wait is a bummer though!
-
1. I don't see vents on the front so I don't know how accurate that pic is.
2. don't see why it would be.
yes, on how it tilts up. -
That was expected, the CES G73 Case seems unfinished
-
It's all your fault!! lol!
I'm waiting for what else CES has to offer before pulling the trigger. -
SHOCKED after your experience with Asus.
-
/slits wrists
-
oh well, my order's still locked in also!! And with the Raid option, no need to think about a SSD now!! atleast for me
-
IMO, RAID is still weak in notebooks. The controllers are usually sub-par. We'll see how this one is.
-
Asus is reputable for there MOBO's with RAID, I wouldnt be suprised if this exceeds some peoples expectations.
-
Raid isn't even close to an SSD. Raid might have high read/write speeds but still has the same access times, which kills it. the main selling point of an SSD is its tiny *less than .1ms* access times.
-
May not have the seek speeds, but it will none the less speed it up regardless over regular drives.
-
Overkill much?!?
I wonder how much they underclocked the core frequency by. Really hope they don't do 1600 SPs @ 500 mhz-ish, and swap-in GDDR3 the last min... Just expect the best, and fear the worst that's all. -
not in a noticeable way..I've used raid on the G51VX and it showed little to no real world gains..
-
Why fight about it? Just RAID a pair of SSDs.
edit: Are there bandwidth issues in doing that? -
There are TRIM issues with doing that.
-
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
the whikebook had a good raid bios. i dont remember if i save me benchmark from hdtune.
quicklite i like the nokia n900 in your pic. i was looking at it but no multitouch killed me. i'm using the palm pre right now. and i'm looking at the hero -
That's the worst option. The faster a single drive is by itself the less benefit you gain from going RAID.
1xSSD (OS & Apps) and 1xHDD (Storage) -
Access time is not the main selling point to me and to many other people, 3xReading/writing speed is the main selling point for most professional users who "Needs" the faster writing/reading, however access point make everything a breeze definitely for the average user but it's not required, a lot of the professional users work is not possible without raid
plus opening files with those huge DSLR photos in RAW takes FOREVER without Raid
-
A quick google searched and I fully understand what you mean. Thanks
-
Like EIement said, Its only in certain specific IO intensive environment, that RAID-0 technology shows decent gain. Even then the difference is not clear-cut as days and nights, as you feel when upgrading to a decent SSD, (X-25M) from 5400 rpm 2.5 drives.
Normally RAID-0 gives pretty marginal gains that's all, they generally don't scale the performance proportionally with spinning disk - SSD is different though, as the scaling there is often much more obvious.
Plus RAID-0 brings twice the probability of data loss, if one drive fails - then kiss all your data goodbye. Not to mention that since both drives are almost always-on, the battery gets hit quite a bit.
@dondadah88, its a great phone with awesome software - if only the hardware was as good and innovating, resistive TS + 5MP camera is a bit old in 2010. Going for a SE X10 next myself. -
Now I want one!
-
I wouldnt mind a laptop - but this is way too expensive and overkill for a non-gaming uni student...
-
I like the fact that for a non-gaming uni student such as yourself this is too expensive while a gaming uni student like me sees it as incredibly cheap (for what I'm getting at least - $1645 is still a lot of money)
-
It all comes down to the usage I suppose.
I don't really see the need of a laptop, when the labs here open 24/7, got fast net speed, and are filled with 2.8Ghz C2Q desktops, with some 3Ghz Nehalem workstations for video editing - getting a laptop actually means less processing power.
Having tried M1730 in the past, I know I'd just waste the graphical processing power, where as the CPU is often the bottleneck for me - I do some editing these days. -
Where can I find the "combined GPU/CPU Vantage scores" of other recent gaming laptops?
edit: Looks like a score of 8140 for the Acer Aspire 8940G priced at $1,349.99, correct?
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=5381&p=2
edit: Or is that a GPU only result? -
Any pics of this thing with the lid shut?
-
thats exactly what I wanna see atm.
-
something just occured to me, if u look at the pic( http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/01/asusces_0038.jpg), you can see how the optical drive is angled, so won't that making changing optical drives difficult?
or is it the bezel thats angled and regular optical drive behind that? -
Is the score of 8140 reported in this review a "combined GPU/CPU Vantage score"?
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=5381
URL edited -
giving error page not found, but if its the Aspire 8940g you're talking about, its probably 3Dmark06 score,not Vantage and its a combined score
-
That was the 06 score ...
-
Thats just the bezel cut to the shape of the chassis, the drive is straight into the machine...
-
I've corrected the URL in my question below:
Is the score of 8140 reported in this review a "combined GPU/CPU Vantage score"?
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=5381&p=2 -
Its not a vantage score at all, it is a 3DMark06 score as has already been stated twice.
-
I wonder what the 3DMark06 score is for this laptop =x
-
and its a combined GPU/CPU 3DMark06 score
-
I second that.. do u guys think it'll be similar to 280M GTX or higher than 280M GTX?
-
I do too...am hoping for 14.5k stock. I think that might be a bit too hopeful tho :\
-
i checked vantage scores for the 3870x2 and the 5870 mobility might be 3-15% faster
-
Do we know anything about the relationship between
a) combined GPU/CPU 3DMark06 score, and
b) combined GPU/CPU Vantage score?
I assume they are correlated? -
vantage is strictly DX10
3dmark 06 is DX9
vantage with nvidia gpus also makes use of physx which produces inflated scores by around 30% or something -
dondadah88 Notebook Nobel Laureate
throw up numbers and was it overclocked or stocked. if stock 3870x2 then
ASUS G73JH-A1 with ATi Mobility Radeon HD 5870 1GB GDDR5
Discussion in 'ASUS Gaming Notebook Forum' started by iaTa, Dec 31, 2009.