Cloudfire doesn't seem to be that clueless![]()
So glad i waited.
-
^^ he never seem to be one
the thing is rumoring is a dangerous thing, and we all love hardware business (that's why we have top of the line lappies and we follow upto the news of these new beasts), so we are all a little too ambitious when talking about rumors
btw good one waiting it out! now wait one more month and get 680mI think I will wait until widezu puts it on his computer, then I will go ahead and buy it
(but if the price from dell is 1k, then I am waiting until new gen, it is almost the price of a lappy
)
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Lets just hope clevo and dell don't decide to put 1ghz samsung memory modules on there.
Best case scenario is power is the limiting factor and you get hynix T2C chips on there.
I'd like to see what it can do too.
Great, a leap forward at 1280x720.
Now what's the jump in X score as that is what matters here. -
The CRYTEK have several times confirmed and stated that the CryEngine has mods that have proofed themselves going to the edge of GPU power and destroying FPS.. We ain't even taking full advantage of these engines.. that really blasts me away sometimes!
Not to forget the 4A Engine that is used in Metro 2033 (and Metro 2034/Last Night) which is using: PhysX, the engine uses many features such as destructible environments, and cloth and water simulations, and particles that can be fully affected by environmental factors.[5] The audio in the engine features 3D sound positioning, spatialisation and attenuation.
I just can't imagine how games are going to look in 4 years or so.. we will probably get near the point of perfection where the visuals in games will look better than reality (as if Crysis doesn't already do that)
P.S. Sorry for derailing the threadI will stop now
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
You also have to worry if the GPU is ocing itself during those tests it may not have anything else to give and it could just slap into its programmed TDP wall and not go anywhere.....
-
Meaker just wait for maxwell they will be bigging that up. I hope they deliver there future roadmap claims.
-
-
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
80% is a leap, I just want to know what that leap is at 1080p rather than 720p.
-
Outstanding achievement by nVIDIA.
--** Shoutout to CloudFire for the correct prediction on CUDA core count (1344)! -
Thanks graz, Zalgradis and Zero.
I was probably the only one in this forum who was able to come to the conclusion that a downclocked 670 should be easy piecy considering the previous generation. I was met with "Nothing can beat 7970M, pitcairn is too efficient" "You are an idiot, P4900 is the right score because all the big sites have that 3DMark11 score listed as 680M real score"
Nobody listened to me that it was an old outdated benchmark from a GK106 GPU which never saw the light of day because of 7970M.
But anyways, Origin have the 680M available from June 25th, plus Notebookcheck is supposed to get a sample for their review already this week. So benchmarks should be here anytime soon and we will see if the graphs from Nvidia holds any truth or if it is pure marketing.
Atleast it looks promising although this forum is flooded by AMD fanboys trying to find excuses (I was expecting it): "Overclocked 7970M will match 680M (that one made me laugh), the graphs from Nvidia is decieving, they overclocked the 680M, nobody wants their expensive GPU, nobody needs the extra performance over 7970M"
bla bla bla bla. Sometimes I get tired from reading all of these posts where people just need to justify THEIR own purchase. If 680M is better than 7970M, DEAL with it instead of trying to make excuses. If 680M was at the 7970M performance, then fine, it is what it is. Both cards will sell like crazy. Both camps should be happy about their cards since they are both an insane update over previous generation GPUs -
hm, weird, notebookcheck lists first benchmark results pretty much on par with the 7970M: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M - Notebookcheck.com Technik/FAQ
and no, those arent the first 4.6k 3dmark11 leaks anymore... -
-
Those scores doesn`t add up with the Performance score Nvidia got -
nvidia.com? where did u get that?
-
So when is this event where nVidia was supposedly going to reveal the 680M ? Today, at what time? And how can we get the inside scoop on it ??
-
ZOMG. Anandtech in their recent article about Origin and 680M
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
The point is, all we have are manufacturer benchmarks, so the verdict is still out on how well it clocks.
Also I hope you don't include me in the saying it could not be a down clocked 670.... -
these cards says 2gb mem
-
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
We don't know detail levels, resolution or AA/AF settings.
The jury is still WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY out on this one. -
They already have benchmarked it inside the Alienware too but they will wait til tomorrow...ARGH
-
its gonna be a rough night for cloudfire
-
Sigh...
Now I have to return my 680SLI desktop... 680M 1344 4GB VRAM SLI *drools* -
Yup I think so.
Yeah jaybee, I want to see it NOW -
-
I have no idea, probably July. Shouldn`t Alienware and Origin/Clevo offer the GPUs around the same time? Origin is shipping them from June 25th
BTW, I`m spamming F5 at Anandtech right now
-
Sent From My Rooted EVO 3D -
GTX 670 is on par with the 7970. Look at the memory bandwidth...
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Bandwidth past a point does not help.
7870 is not past that point at 1.2ghz. The 670 is at 1.5ghz.
You comparison is like saying 512mb of video ram is fine since the jump from 1gb to 2gb is so small. -
-
-
I have no idea. Too buisy pressing the F5
-
And you're probably gonna need a new keyboard soon! Oh, if only they supplied just the F5 button...
-
i think he means a desktop 7970..but then that's a speculation...
-
he was sarcastic
-
Originally Posted by Meaker
Bandwidth past a point does not help.
7870 is not past that point at 1.2ghz. The 670 is at 1.5ghz.
You comparison is like saying 512mb of video ram is fine since the jump from 1gb to 2gb is so small.
Well the 680M isn`t suppose to compete against 7970 is it?
i was thinking that when he stated 680M isn`t suppose to compete against 7970 ....i was thinking that was a direct comparison to a desktop card like the desktop cards above. i have yet to see a 670m card do 1.5 ghz or even close... -
I'm very glued to this thread as I am anxiously waiting for a reply from my Clevo reseller to see if i can change my order to a GTX 680m, i have been watching this thread for a long time and was always suspicious of the original p4900 score that was posted. Go Nvidia/Cloudfire
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Changing orders due to manufacturer benchmarks is.... well.... naive.
-
-
GTX 680M is available for single card and SLI already before the end of this month...
-
If GTX680M has GPU boost does that mean I don't have to OC it. It will OC it automatically? Also how does GPU boost work? Do I have to give it a FPS value for it to try and maintain. For example 60FPS? Or 80FPS if I need an extra 20FPS for recording with FRAPS.
Edit: Guys I think I found the offical GTX680M spec. http://www.anandtech.com/show/5914/nvidia-geforce-gtx-680m-kepler-gk104-goes-mobile -
Wow. Nice... too bad 16th June is my deadline on receiving a new laptop. Else, I might just have waited.
-
HaloGod2012 Notebook Virtuoso
and it looks like its 2GB not the 4 we thought
-
Full article explaining GTX 680M is up at Anandtech
AnandTech - NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M: Kepler GK104 Goes Mobile
-
SlickDude80 Notebook Prophet
well, here are the official benches of the 680m...7970m owners, no need to dump your cards
The only question i have is how high the 680m will overclock...i hope that 900mhz vram doesn't hold it back. From those numbers, is this card worth another $300 over 7970m?
my OC'ed 7970m scores better or even in Witcher 2, diablo3, bf3 and skyrim
EDIT: Cloud beat me to it
-
Dang 60FPS in Skyrim and ~100 in STALKER look nice. We never got Stalker numbers (or did we?) but isn't Skyrim about the same?
-
-
it has nearly double the cuda cores of the 680m leak that we had heard about. this is the way it should be, and im sure the price will come down, i remember the 580m was way more expensive at first but then it dropped afterwards.
-
Comparing with the 7970M review. Not all games could be compared but based on the sample pic and compared against the notebookcheck review:
http://www.notebookcheck.com/Test-Alienware-M17x-R4-Notebook.74805.0.html
and
http://images.anandtech.com/doci/5914/nvidia-gtx-680m-performance-new_575px.png
Battlefield 3:
7970M 34.7FPS
680M 47.4FPS
680M is 36.7% faster
Dirt 3:
7970M 64.1FPS
680M 69.5FPS
680M is 8.4% faster
Skyrim:
7970M 55.6FPS
680M 59.4
680M is 6.8% faster
Diablo 3
7970M 100.8FPS
680M 90.1FPS
680M is 10.7% slower
F1
7970M 65FPS
680M 67FPS
680M is 3% faster
Metro 2033
7970M 26.9FPS
680M 39.5FPS
680M is 46.8% faster
GTX 680M is 15.2% faster than 7970M.
Take a good look at Metro 2033 and Battlefield. Major p3wnage
AMD 7970m vs GTX 680m
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by x32993x, Apr 20, 2012.