"Razer Blade will have a new 14 Blade with GTX 870M and a 17 Blade Pro with GTX 860M and no, thats not a typo, though perhaps well see more than one model of Blade Pro as it seems odd for the smaller laptop to support a faster GPU."
Oh my goodness..![]()
-
-
Nope:
Test Schenker XMG P304 (Clevo W230SS) Notebook - Notebookcheck.com Tests
Kepler: 797Mhz + Boost
Maxwell: 1029Mhz + Boost -
-
ThePerfectStorm Notebook Deity
Here we go - official numbers - Nvidia: launch of the GeForce 800M series - NotebookCheck.net News
-
-
ThePerfectStorm Notebook Deity
Agree with you here octiceps, I'm waiting for benchmarks for all the cards as well.
-
-
Some Benchmarks: (already posted above)
Test Schenker XMG P304 (Clevo W230SS) Notebook - Notebookcheck.com Tests -
GeForce GTX 870M | Specifications | GeForce
Memory Specs:
Up to 2500 MHzMemory Clock (MHZ)
GDDR5Standard Memory Configuration
128-bitMemory Interface Width
64.0Memory Bandwidth (GB/sec)
Nvidia's own website ? -
ThePerfectStorm Notebook Deity
Watch GenTech's reviews for the GT60 Dominator/Dominator Pro, GT70 Dominator/Dominator Pro and GE60 Apache Pro/GE70 Apache Pro. Those give benchmarks of the 880M, 870M and 860M (which is also covered in the w230ss review).
-
ThePerfectStorm Notebook Deity
-
Good to see that the announced specs / testing are almost dead on with the leaked info Cloudfire has been posting. The Maxwell chips are really shinning bright on a 28nm process. Wonder what the 20nm releases will bring?
-
Any_Key likes this.
-
Ehm...
...how come 860M outperformance both 870M AND 880M in fps!?
GeForce GTX 860M | Performance | GeForce
GeForce GTX 870M | Performance | GeForce
GeForce GTX 880M | Performance | GeForce
Or am I just being retarded!? -
-
read the posts again. -
-
870 says it runs at an average just above 30 fps for Assassins Creed Black Flag and looking at the performance chart for 860M is looks like its close to 45 fps?
...please un-retard me! -
If you are only looking at 1 game. Thats even more retarded. Thats the only game maxwell outperforms kepler.
-
Aaaaaaahaaa....
....different max fps on the scale!
lol lol ...and I was all like copy 'n pasting screenshots, overlapping and drawing lines and s**t before I noticed!
Prolly should try to catch some sleep!Cloudfire likes this. -
Waiting for a Razer Blade refresh with Broadwell and an 870mx...
-
-
-
Cloudfire, it seems that the 870 scored 7280 at 3d mark 11 graphics that is 20% more than the GTX 680's 5789 graphics score, does that mean the 870 could be a full 20% better in performance or is 3d mark not conclusive and other benchmarks like extreme editions have to be looked at? and do you still stand by the statement of GTX 870 5-10% Above GTX 680, let us know your opinion
thanks mate -
Robbo99999 likes this.
-
Robbo99999 Notebook Prophet
680M: 256bit x 3600Mhz = 921600
870M: 192bit x 5000Mhz = 960000
I'm not saying there are any units to the above calculations but it looks like the 870M is going to have a greater bandwidth by about 4%. But you're definitely right in terms of the ROPS, less ROPS for the 870M. All in all makes me think the 870M isn't really going to be hindered by memory bandwidth in games anymore than the 680M, and therefore I think a comparison of 3DMark11 is a valid comparison of the 2 cards, indicative of gaming performance. It might not be the full 20% that gust0007750 asked about, as the somewhat higher shader performance might bring to light the memory bandwidth limitations of both of the cards, but I think it could be close to 20% depending on how memory bandwidth hungry a game is.
(As you say, I think the gap is likely to be smaller on the benchmarks that tax the memory bandwidth to a greater extent - like maybe the Extreme versions of 3DMark do).
EDIT: decided to 'like' your post in the end (yep, I know you don't/shouldn't really care!), because I think you're right in the main about it, I just put some figures on it to put the memory bandwidth of the 2 cards into perspective. (I think I'd rather have a 680M with an unlocked vBIOS vs an 870M). -
-
Memory bandwidth might be similar even with a 192bit bus, but the 870m has less ROPs than the 680m too.
-
Guys do you think the G-sync, V-sync of the 870 can cause significant improvements over 680? and I am really torn between the incredibly discounted 680 and the 870 with the 4800 which I will not benefit fromif any of you guys has facebook and is willing to help me choose please pm me your facebook email thanks...it will mean alot coming from a guy with an inspiron 1300 that stutters in texashold'em
-
-
-
-
GTX 870m 128 bit or 192 bit? GTX 880m just an O/C GTX 780m. The "good" GTX 860m going to soldered on boards... And lastly, the 370SM3 is blinged out (tail lights on the back side for crying out loud!)
I think I am going to wait for the dust to settle on this stuff. I got $4k in the bank waiting to be spent. It can wait some more. -
deadsmiley, James D and octiceps like this.
-
-
-
I gotta say, I'm quite impressed with Maxwell from what I've read, but sheesh, that Razer 14" took me by storm hadeadsmiley likes this. -
ThePerfectStorm Notebook Deity
-
-
honestly i've had so much fun learning from you guys, and researching stuff that i like is just fun! I think if i ever decide between the GS60, the p34g, and the razer blade, i would gladly stick around.
-
-
ThePerfectStorm Notebook Deity
I'm more concerned about text readability on a 14" 3200x1800 screen.
-
Check out MSI homepage, MSI GS70 2PE apache pro has 870m, not 860m!!!
-
ThePerfectStorm Notebook Deity
-
Robbo99999 Notebook Prophet
Found a link to this NVidia Web Page, describing the specs of the 880M, on laptopvideo2go.
GeForce GTX 880M | Specifications | GeForce
Interestingly, and I'm sure wrongly NVidia says it has a 128bit memory bus only & a pitiful bandwidth - I think they've had some major typo/brain freeze problems when they created that page - that info has to be wrong surely! -
ThePerfectStorm Notebook Deity
-
Robbo99999 Notebook Prophet
Yes, according to those pages the memory bus configuration and bandwidth are the same at 64GB/s from the 850M all the way up through to the 880M! I don't know how they can make those errors, they're the ones supplying the GPU's themselves! I wonder how long it will take them to correct it!
-
If this is the case, I may consider the MSI (except I completely LOATHE the logo on the lid). I really want a decently powerful 17" that doesn't weigh a ton. This MSI looks quite promising. Curious to see 870m performance, power, heat numbers.
In any case I'm still holding out for a few more months for 20nm Maxwell 870m in a thin and light. Perhaps MSI will update accordingly, or Aorus will throw us a surprise too. -
@ HTWingNut
Well it seems that the MSI GS is already using a 860m (Keppler). According to this german website (from Cebit):
View attachment 109829
View attachment 109828
New details about Nvidia`s Maxwell
Discussion in 'Gaming (Software and Graphics Cards)' started by Cloudfire, Feb 12, 2014.