-->*OFFICIAL: MSI GT725 Owner's Lounge*<--

It was already tested by electrosoft and it worked fine.

 

Yeah, we found that without modification we can get 2, occasionally 3 cores overclocking themselves for a single thread (you can do this by following the earlier youtube examples.)

Now it seems that darth actually got what was originally started, to work properly, and now were locking IDA/DDA in .

Darth, which program are you using to lock eist in?

We also have speed step options in the bios too dont we?

Edit* Damit just realised, q9000 is running on frikin half multis.

 

Interesting stuff. Once you get it perfected Im interested in the readings, I'd like to see if my X9100 wants to show some extra legs
..Although perhaps Im being greedy, my 2 cores already operate at 3070Mhz when they're not idling
Know it'll do 3.3+ though from my multiplier clocking with my M17.

 

Well alex, give one core a shot.

Go to youtube, find a 720p video (hopefully this works.)

Then go to task manager, assign all your IExplorer processes to core 0 with the afinity option, and play the video, monitor which ever core oc's (if it does) with CPU-Z,

 

Mine doesnt overclock unfortunately, just goes between 1600 and 3060-70Mhz on that core.

 

Hmmm What about intel XTU? (I think it was.)

Strange that, maybe your machine doesnt have IDA/DDA features?

 

Possibly. Im not overtly enamoured with the Nvidia chipset

If you load CPU-z whats the multiplier range your CPU breaks...when IDA kicks in does it go OVER the shown range? Also XTU doesnt work as I dont have an Intel based machine

 

Ahh curse nvidia.

I dont get a multiplier range, but i can make it hit 8.5 without a problem.

Just incase you havent had a chance to miss through yet, heres the screenie

 

Might be because mine is a QS, mines a dual core, or the already high multi haha

 

So does this kick in for you guys when you use setfsb as well? I tried the hd video trick for mine and it almost never went past its x6 multiplier and when it did it jumped to x8 which is normal. If it works with setfsb that might make it worth it though.

 

Yeah i've had it still work when overclocked, had my q9 running at 2.7 once before. (Only for single threads though )

 

can i have my q9000 at 2.0ghz and when i push turbo go to 2.4?

do u know how to change my cpu volts?

 

I dont think you can unfortunately lena, unless we find a bios bypass (someone would need to mod it.)

And why in blazers would you wana change your cpu voltage :S?

 

can u pls set ur ocing tutorial to ur sing to easily find it?
i will compare 2 bios and see the differences!!!

 

There you go man, but take it easy if you do decide to go ahead, remember anything can happen, take your time, and read closely ok?

 

i have already read ur post and overclock my q9000 but bios u provide are sooo old.. also i just check that bios u provide to oc with last on and are EXACTLY the same..!!!!!! just in advance section there is not that thing it says about %. Every code is the same..:// i dont understand what program should i find to edit bios and find more info from what i have already saw..
u know my problem with old bios is the slpash screen.i dont like it.do u know how can i change it to the newer one?

 

I dont know how to change bios pics unfortunately, but yeah the bios i post are old there meant to be! they dont have the limiter thats why we use them hehe.

I could rip the advents bios, but i think that could be fairly risky unless someone did a good comparison of the two inside out.

 

With default settings in the bios and no Oc.

 

but how are you locking the damned multi dead .

 

I think it's my processor by default , that's why i asked lena for some screenhots to compare .. HWinfo , everest and sometimes cpuz read it the same @ 2.6 10x ... and that with EIST on .. when it's off it read it @ 2.4 9x .. confusing ?

 

so whats it working at, 2.4 or 2.6? lol, i had this problem before with wprime.

 

2.6 .. as most seems to read it that way anyway , the guy tod me that turning EIST will force the clocks @ the ida frequency , that's on a dual core .. go ahead and try it , disable the thing in ur bios and activate 2 core

 

still thinking about it. Why, seen a bargain or you changing AGAIN

 

Hmm ok, when i get home, i will disable speed step from bios, then force it via RMCLOCK64, and pray that it works .

 

Whenever I disable speed step, setfsb always gives me a bsod.

 

I had to delete a few posts in here - stay on-topic and don't insult people.

Also, this forum is not a instant messenger/text messanger - use proper English with proper punctuation.

 

Thanks! I rather wondered why some people seem to prefer slot, as I didn't see a significant advantage. I would have thought they'd be more prone to dust, etc. And with the tray, if all else fails you've got the pin hole to get the disk out, so I would surmise with slot type it would have to be dissasembled to retrieve a stuck disk.

 

<.< I like the slot load drives, but I've heard some pretty bad stories about them. I recall a forum member posted a while back that his dell slot load laptop would launch the cd out when he hit eject.

 

Haha, i think slot loadeds are pretty good too, but like vulv said, it breaks down, dismantle job (or double sided sticky tape card) job right there, thats the only problem with them.

I know the dell/alienware m17x had a user or two with a malfunctioning slot druve, but they could force eject it by holding eject while booting up, thats the only fail safe i've known of.

Mind you my slot loaded drive in my cars broke cant get the disk out.

 

its good coz of me..isnt it?

 

yes Lena it is

 

OR you can get an external bluray player which in my opinion would cost you less . Anyway , remember we talked about touchpad protectors etc ? I got mine in today Haven't got the chance to stick it yet but it looks great without any blown up pixels and stuff .. check attached Very "high Quality" pic i've taken
EDIT : I screw up on the sizing ! had to do a lot of cutting ...

wished mine was like that instead of getting stuck in all the time ..

 

Excellent! Refresh my memeory, where did you get these done?

 

I would prefer a slot drive. Pull out laptop drives are generally extremely flimsy feeling, the GT725 included. Some slots even have a little brush type thing right at the entrance to stop dust etc.

But a disk-shooting drive? Thats hilarious! Kind of like the sd card spacer in the GT725

 

Hi,
Do you guys perhaps know how to set the machine to wake up from standby with an usb mouse? I don't have the option the enable it in device manager (neither in win7 or vista). The option is greyed out. Maybe the bios does not support this?
Thanks!

 

That's fine.
But i have 1.10 bios and regardless if i enable or disable "usb legacy support" (which is dos usb support if i'm right) the wake on options for usb root hubs are still greyed out in windows so i cannot turn it on.

 

Anyway , Anger flushed out so let's carry on where we left shall we ? .
@ Animaleyes : I was thinking about changing again but changed my mind after seeing it running over 2.4 without me doing anything

So cata , any luck ? Rmclock doesn't seems to like me or any other software on my 725 so I gave up trying ..

 

Does the q9200 come in oem form or did you get an es? Could be why prehaps?

 

Could be .. Comes as ES only. According to some little research I've done , Intel doesn't planned on releasing it

EDIT: Tried Crystal on my studio15 last night and managed to hit 2.5 on multiplier alone No luck on the 725 though.

 

Ahh grand news man, im currently settiing up my pc again as i've done a nice big format, straight after that it'l be to rmclock.

 

Kool ! how did you managed to make it work on w7 64 ? I tried everything ... even the asiv.exe thingy but in vain. I'm sure nice things can be done with that thing

 

Didnt you know man? theres now a signed rmclock dll? .

 

Oki i'll give it one more shot If it doesn't work I will give up on the whole OC crap. (on the 725 that is)

 

Haha, WE NEVER GIVE UP!

Im sure theres a way of cracking this, setfsb OCings easy enough, but getting this to work would be mega!

Signed 64bit component?
http://go.notebookreview.com/?id=525X832&url=http://www.flipfire.net/download/rtcore64.zip

RMClock
http://go.notebookreview.com/?id=525X832&url=http://cpu.rightmark.org/download/rmclock_235_bin.exe

 

Thanks !
Ok , still @ 2.6 using RMc which was the actual clock to begin with . Doesn't seems to budge Could be because I'm using the latest bios..
Better results on my studio15 though .. How about you ?

 

rmclock always gives me trouble.

crystsalcpuid allowed me to increase my multiplier but only when doing non-intensive tasks. At max, it would reduce back to normal.

 

Hmm strange darth, i can get a single thread running at 110% total speed all the time, having troubles getting rmclock to work too at the moment, reporting back tommorow.



God, last time anything like that happened, i had a blown ram stick on my hands .

Changing the process priority to high seems to shift the clock up slightly more (for me anyway.)

 

really? how? it just automatically does it for you?

 

Yep, after the assigned affinity, it behaves nicely,

 

assigned affinity to just 2 cores, right?