Sheep are very silent whenever a socketed discussion comes up they get heated up like BGA and shut it down as they love that tech and thus these designs are put forth in the testing, First the Battery Drain on "ALL" BGA machines then came the faux heatfins/ heatsink then this is the new standard tripod b$ no one knows what they are buying, Hahaha where are the BGA Advocates ? Thin and light but want high performance, against physics this is what you will get. Please buy more of them so that next time you will get a fully soldered laptop with thickness like a Macbook Air with GTX1080 SLI - Soldered RAM, Soldered HS, Soldered SSD, Soldered Display, Soldered CMOS, Soldered Battery everything.
![]()
I seriously look forward for that day, It's gonna happen soon. Just wait for the outcry and then grab a popcorn, soda and watch the world burn![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
-
Last edited: Mar 7, 2017Ashtrix likes this. -
-
TBoneSan likes this. -
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
@Papusan, why the hell do you care about the P640HK? It isn't even in your target market. You want DTRs, you use a DTR. This notebook is 1/3 the volume and mass of your heavy-as-hell P870KM. It's meant for a different purpose altogether. The fact that it comes with BGA parts is also because it is small. It is not for you, so why do you bother ranting about it?
Plus, the 'triple screw' heatsink mount is not new. The W230ST used it, four years ago:
Last edited: Mar 7, 2017 -
Edit. Regarding TRIPOD. See same pict. Cpu is the lost rPGA socket modell and cpu heatsink have all 4 legs intact.
Last edited: Mar 7, 2017 -
-
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
Likewise, each machine is built for a specific load. If you exceed that limit, and it throttles, don't complain. The AW13r3, MSI GS43VR and P640HK do well at their stock loads. Value for money is achieved. The Razer Blade Pro is a different story, and calling that one out on its ****ty stock performance, I agree with.
You see, like I said earlier. It isn't because of BGA that something throttles. It is the poor implementation of cooling, the mismatch of hardware power draw with a machine's given volume and ability to dissipate that heat... And sometimes, ill-judged attempts to push a piece of hardware beyond its specified limits.
Problems, which I heard even the better machines like the P870DM have. Doesn't the CPU and GPU in your machines hit 90° C when stock? Compared to any desktop, that's rubbish.
Of all the things you guys think of dissing, you choose the number of screws on a heatsink mount? Seriously???Last edited: Mar 8, 2017 -
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
Duplicate.
-
If you looked at the picture of the test I put in the link...Then you can clearly see that this Kaby BGA 7700hq chips run fully throttling clock speed 2.29GHz and max cpu pacage power around 28.7W. I see you say they perform decently, Oh'well. FYI (This is around 56% of max capacity of this Turd chips). People need to see what this is... Pure Trash!! Info out to the people!!TomJGX, Ashtrix, TBoneSan and 1 other person like this. -
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
Last edited: Mar 8, 2017 -
Edit: Of course the VID voltage is lower when the BGA chip IS IN FULLY THROTTLING MODE!! What did you expect?Last edited: Mar 8, 2017Georgel likes this. -
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
-
Why pull my conclusion in doubt? Don't do that!! Probably put in a limit on the maximum power draw. Maybe they know that this BGA MACHINE will get serious problems with maximum power draw. And the psu can't deliver enough power for this Turd!! 124w power draw vs. 120w psu is in line with the rest.
-
That looks really awful...
-
Time for fully temp fix my good friend.
Georgel likes this. -
-
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
Nevertheless... @Stooj, you mentioned you had a friend with this machine. Could you test this out? A CPU running at 2.3 GHz with no thermal throttling whatsoever is really odd... -
Papusan likes this.
-
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
-
-
Also the Laptop components power draw there's not just a CPU and GPU now add that tinny adapter It's pretty normal joke that machine is running full-throttle LOL due to the Mobo hardcap, Still even if it runs doesn't matter as the heatsink is trash grade also a 7700HQs JOKE turbos/trash voltage binning it has..worse than Haswell BGA turbos. Meh waste of time talking about this BGA Turdbook.
Last edited: Mar 8, 2017Papusan likes this. -
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
This notebook is almost meant to use BGA (I'd like to see an LGA socket and the PCH stuffed into a 14" chassis—tell me when it has happened; also, we can't talk about rPGA because there is no more rPGA to talk about), so why do you worry? It's like what I said earlier. You guys take thin and light notebooks and force a huge load on them, it's not going to work well.
This circlejerk is almost becoming a joke. I've got a question. Do you guys get high when you rant about a notebook like this, and call it a 'turdbook' while jerking your E-wieners just because 'hurr durr look at me, me has a Core i7-7700K and 64000 GB 10 GHz DDR400 RAM and GTX 1080 SLI OC and beats every puny little thing in the world'????????Last edited: Mar 8, 2017 -
BGA has it's place in certain applications, but the contempt for it in expensive units is fully justified. And with Apple pushing the 'right to repair' legislation with other big manufacturers jumping on board - sh#t just got real, I'd say 'told you so'. BGA doesn't end well for all of us.
People need to stop taking it personally, it's a machine.Last edited: Mar 8, 2017 -
Only joy and happiness should exist for everybody!
BGA surely has its place. It is just that the top end of electronics should not praise BGA. Especially when someone buying them might render stuff and such. Especially heavy duty FHD and 4K renders. Especially when some people really need to powa.
But if someone needs portability, it is a thing to start with; As for price / performance ratio, there should be a line after which they start putting socketed hardware from. Like really should be a point after which BGA is considered not okay. For example, a 5000$ laptop should not come with BGA. No. That's just. No. At that price you can build desktop + monitor + all peripherials + audiophile headphones + gaming chair + gaming desk. Placing a BGA CPU at that price point might not be absolutely okay...TBoneSan likes this. -
To explain what I mean: Clevo is not as popular as other brands that only sell BGA. Say, a professional might need the most power he can get but doesn't really have the time to read and all - they could end with a BGA and not be happy with it and never even know that there was a much better option available.
-
Nor is approved when this low end chips throttles in this Jokebook down to 2.79GHz when the cpu really should run 3,4GHz in games.
-
-
Georgel likes this.
-
Thousandmagister Notebook Consultant
You can always buy a better adapter . OEM adapter barely deliver enough of power for notebook
I bought 150W Dell Slim Adapter for my 14" Clevo W230SS (45W Haswell + 75W Maxwell) . Now my notebook can overclock like a charm . The original 120W adapter is crap , it makes my laptop shut down randomly when overclocking
I can't believe they would be that stupid to use 120W adapter on a i7 7700HQ + 1050Ti
TBoneSan, Ionising_Radiation and Papusan like this. -
Papusan likes this.
-
-
I was making the point that using a bigger PSU doesn't always give the machine access that extra power depending on the machine/BIOS etc
ThePerfectStorm, Papusan and Ionising_Radiation like this. -
-
Well, I owned BGA for over 10 years before P775. From i5-450 and many other CPUs in laptops from a wide array of producers.
I know you are right about this and BGA was pretty awful for me. Even Clevo with their default BIOS was quite bad.
BGA just are not adequate for certain tasks.
If someone really doesn't need the powa, it's better for them but as a power user, it was quite disappointing to see that a 4710hq still had quite a few problems, and it throttled. Like... it reached 100C on Acer Aspire VN-7-791, to the point where it would shut down. Just from moderate gaming -
This thread will love this whole article.
There is no information about the product, no CPU, no GPU, no price, no RAM, nothing! The article mentions a 1 inch thickness. People really need to stop calling a 1" thick laptop a gaming laptop. They are slim machines which would probably pass acceptably as strong office notebooks but really really really it is a bad idea to keep proposing the idea of thiness on laptops. IT just hurts everyone, makes people wish or think they wish thin machines then they hurt when the machine is not performing well. Like really. Encapsulating the whole motherboard is also really bad since it permits like zero upgrades, zero everything...
The more they push the BGA and the more they push it in the higher prices, the more of a problem it is for us... It's not even about just whether it is strong or not at this point. The simple idea that they're pursing thiness and flashy office notebooks is giving me an itch. Romanian buying power is low as it is and idk, it is just wrong to sell the hard working people something that could had been better and could had been more serviceable.
Link to the article in question
http://www.pcgamer.com/all-the-powe...source=facebook&utm_campaign=buffer_pcgamerfb -
-
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
@Mr. Fox and @Georgel, why don't you guys get it? The Inspiron notebook isn't in your target market. Its height is certainly enough to cool the components it has (GTX 1050 Ti + i7-7700HQ), and these are specs that don't even deserve socketed components because they are neither valuable nor powerful enough. It's for people who want to play stuff like DOTA, CSGO, Overwatch, and perhaps occasionally Civ, don't care about the occasional performance decrease, don't have enough money for a P870DM, don't even want a P870DM, and don't give two flying hoots that they haven't got powerful enough specs to run the latest benchmarks (and waste electricity). They, unlike everyone else here—occasionally myself included—just want a notebook to play games on, at decent frame-rates (GTX 1050 Ti ≈ GTX 970M; that is a GPU with performance that could be found on a P750ZM 1.5 years ago and is now on a laptop half the height and weight).
Oh, and this notebook is dirt-cheap for its specs. The price? $750. I would buy this notebook, if not for Ryzen and Vega/Navi.
I say again what I said before:
Last edited: Mar 9, 2017 -
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
Duplicate.
-
Who is the big boy?
It's time Mr. Dell merge its gaming division in a single brand... DELL
-
red = only aesthetic
blue = actual heatsink
fake heatsink look cool and big!
FredSRichardson, Ashtrix, Georgel and 2 others like this. -
Ashtrix, Georgel, Dr. AMK and 1 other person like this. -
@Ionising_Radiation I guess for the same reasons BGA lovers don't get it. Because this the the BGA venting thread and venting is healthy... especially when something as vile as this cancer has metastsized and destroyed almost everything we hold dear. I will never stop hating on the notion of BGA in something liars and shysters are pitching as high performance. That is misrepresentation and deception. It might not be so bad if they presented it accurately as a low budget compromiser option rather than something amazing. These lies and deceptive marketing stunts need to stop. It's not right. Perhaps they are concerned that it would not be as successful if they were honest about its shortcomings, and that would be further evidence of misrepresentation.
Edit: see above example of deception and misrepresentation. Shameful. They had space for something better, made it look like something better, but wimped out... again.
If these compromiser products had all of the appropriate disclaimers and disclosures about their capabilities, or lack thereof, they would not sell nearly as many and they know that.Last edited: Mar 10, 2017Ashtrix, Georgel, Papusan and 1 other person like this. -
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
TL;DR: shut up, it's getting annoying. I understand that you don't like the implementation of soldered components in ultra-high-end notebooks, but you have absolutely no right to diss notebooks that aren't in your target market (anything smaller than 15", thinner than 3 cm and cheaper than $1200—e.g. the Clevo notebook mentioned earlier by @Papusan and now this) and are priced entirely correctly for the components they contain. I say again: the notebook mentioned by @Georgel is entirely worth its price. For $750, one can achieve 1080p 60 FPS in many games that one couldn't with that sort of price this time last year.
P.S. that notebook can even maintain 3.4 GHz on all cores when stressed to its max:
Last edited: Mar 10, 2017 -
Last edited: Mar 10, 2017
-
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
Last edited: Mar 10, 2017 -
-
Ionising_Radiation ?v = ve*ln(m0/m1)
-
But, I will always dictate what is valuable from my own perspective, and mine is the only one that I care about. Thank goodness I do, because most of the OEMs do not. I will plant as many land mines in the path of the OEMs selling trash as possible. It may not stop them, but I'll take a pound of their flesh anywhere I can, as often as I can. If one person can turn only one person against it, then it is worth all the effort. If the one turned against it does the same, the BGA hate will continue to grow and spread. Not going to take it in the bo-bo lying down and pretend I like it. The whining from the Kool-Aid drinkers that do not like the criticism of BGA garbage it is just a side benefit.
You're totally welcome to stay, but just so you know, the anti-BGA beatings will continue until morale improves.Last edited: Mar 10, 2017
BGA Venting Thread ;)
Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by FredSRichardson, Nov 29, 2016.