we dont know what setting they used running furmark, we know 8msaa 1920*1080p fps too low, cooler than 800*600 0msaa
but as expected, dell oem gtx580m use mlcc on mosfet circuit, clevo use spcap (cost down)........although clevo one is easy to add more capacitor
-
This kinda defeats the "upgradability" of the notebook GPUs (under a standard MXM slot) as the price to upgrade does not make business sense. I might as well buy a new one at that price.
So bottom line - get the best I can get at the onset, and never look back? -
http://forum.notebookreview.com/computer-components/593485-fs-gtx-580m-sli-single-heatsink.html -
-
Let hope the 580m drop down in price when the 6990m is out for Sager. I really much rather have a Nvidia card over an Ati card, little things like force AA really annoy me.
-
Give both these chips time to cool off (meaning a few months not a week or 2) and you'll get better pricing all around. NV's prices are too high. Sooner or later that will cut off sales and they'll realize that. For now they have not.
But even 6990 may cool some as well. Aftermarket pricing is going to be the steepest when the chips are brand new, even worse than pricing with a machine.
So people looking to save money are best off just window shopping. -
Karamazovmm Overthinking? Always!
you can force AA on the CC panel. You dont have the ability to set game profiles for every game that you own, and that is one great feature from nvidia, I still hardly see that as worth the steep pricing. -
RadeonPro settles the issue of game profiles anyway.
Seems like _Cheesy_ is an Nvidia spam bot gone haywire. -
invasion of the nvidia bots. lol. but seriously he'll have more post than u kevin in 3 months.
-
sorry couldn't help myself quite well lol.
-
-
Hey heres some stable overclock results with a P170HM
740/1750/1480 core/mem/shader with default 0.87 voltage
3DMarkVantage P GPU 15872
3DMark11 P GPU 3791
Heaven 2.5 808 (compare to here)
not great but im just starting on it, and Heaven 2.5 needed the clocks lower to avoid tearing so thats the main reason for stopping there
btw the 485m overclocking thead lists the top single card overclock as equivalent to 3DMark11 P GPU 3396, at about the same clocks as the 580m above -
nice i can only get my core and shader on my 485m to 695/1390, but my memory will go to 1800.
-
so would hizzaah's 730.5 core been from a voltage overclock
these are the highest semi stable clocks ive got
3DMarkVantage P GPU 16253 @ 755/1848/1510
3DMark11 P GPU 3973 @ 770/1940/1560 -
so on my 485m the limit at 1.03v is 716/1432/1814 for some reason the next step on the memory is 1827 so i only got an increase of 20mhz when using the increased voltage. too bad the increase is only 0.03 volts
-
btw i have a hard time adding variable resistor on pwm to up voltage
that pin is too small and there is no way measuring a working laptop gpu with multimeter...........finally give it up -
740/1750/1480 on 580m runs 3DMark11 and Vantage without any clue, but Heaven 2.5s a problem, retesting it now at default settings
ok so Heaven 2.5 is temperamental with an oc'd 580m, but its near perfect at 720/1863/1440; compared to 620/1500/1240 the default benchmark difference is 740 to 880 -
no those are totally stable, no artifacts no crashing, that's with the stock driver my machine came with, and i play all of my games with those clocks. I'm going to see if its more stable at higher clocks with the new 280.26 driver. and the highest clocks were 730/1460/1840, but i got artifacts. and what i mean by steps is what you type into your overclocking program is not exactly what it outputs. when you check with nvidia inspector it will give you the actual clocks.
-
oh right decent overclock then, but lol try running Heaven 2.5 on default setting with it, bet it tears it a new one
yea im using nvidia inpector now instead of msi afterburner, how i decided on 1863 memory but dont really understand what its doing -
the clocks are limited in the specific frequencies that they can set to both the memory and core. the memory has ~13mhz between steps, and the core has ~2 mhz between steps.
-
-
Hi
Does anyone of you knows how to use the new NVflash 5.100.0.1? I want to update the VBIOS in my GTX580M and in no way can I deal with it. In version 5.100.0.1 I have a message: "This program can not be run in DOS mode", and version 5.95.0 I have a message: "ERROR: No NVIDIA display adapters found." -
look at this thread http://forum.notebookreview.com/sager-clevo/595765-flashing-video-bios-windows-7-64bit-help.html
You can actually do it in windows 7 without having to do it in dos.
Download nibitor, nvflash and the batch files, that atmosk provided, and nvidia inspector(hint there at the bottom of this post).
check on nvidia inspector to see what the specs are that you want to change.
Extract nvflash into a folder, and then put the batch files in that folder.
Double click the batch file that says backup, and then there should be a rom file in the nvflash folder called backup. make a copy of this file just in case, and then rename one of them vbios.rom.
Then open nibitor and open vbios.rom to edit the voltages or whatever you want to do, the voltage can be edited by opening tools then fermi voltage editor. now i have a supscion that you cannot edit the 580m's vbios in nibitor, so you can try setting it as a gtx 560, as they are essentially the same chip, just different clocks, or you could find a premodded vbios, or just wait for nibito 6.04.
Rename the rom file backup to vbios.rom.
Double click the flash_vbios batch file.
If a black screen pops up and then beeps twice then disappears, you need to click the batch file again and take a print screen of whats in the cmd window.
it should look like this. so i had to change mine from 10DE.0000 to 1558.5102
Next open the vbios.rom using nibitor, and in the advanced info tab change the sub vendor id and subsystem id to what it says its supposed to be in the print screen.
Double click the flash vbios_file and it should ask you to press y and then itll take a few seconds and then you are done.
Then restart your computer.
use nvidia inspector to check that what you wanted to change was changed
here is the stuff that you will need
nvflash windows 5.100.0.1
Backup.bat
flash_vbios.bat
Nibitor 6.03
Nvidia Inspector
edit: im going to try this on my d820. -
It is much safer to do it from DOS.
Old-School FTW! -
considering that a lot of people don't know know that much about dos i think this method is easier.
also why do the shader and core need to be at a one to two ratio. -
The ratio is maintained for stability issues. You will generally be able to reach a higher over-clock if you maintain that ratio. -
Many thanks. But I wonder why the DOS message "ERROR: No NVIDIA display adapters found"?
-
hmm maybe nv flash doesn't support the 580m yet.
-
It worked with bootable USB stick . I had the wrong version of NVflash 5.100.0.1 (for Windows). Like you said, I had to edit the subsystem ID and subvendor ID. Everything works as it should. And even better.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2920XM Processor,CLEVO P150HMx score: P4400 3DMarks
Many thanks one more time. -
cool glad it worked. oh btw can you change the voltage on your card to be higher and what voltages does it support.
-
For me it's maximum. My power supply is too weak (180W). I had to reduce GPU clock to 800MHz for the 3DMark Vantage (with 224W on full load).
-
holy crap youre system is totally maxed out! too bad you didn't get the 17" with the bigger power adapter!
-
I look forward to P270WM
-
my latest 3d mark 11 with oc on my 485m 730/1460/1800 this is my maximum overclock!
http://3dmark.com/3dm11/1653888;jsessionid=kxmazt0um0au?show_ads=true&page=%2F3dm11%2F1653888%3Fkey%3D0EdHEr87f7UuqZJ3XM7vm7Xu0wLPda
3897 3d marks -
-
what do you mean by default setting, the settings in the program or in the overclocking.
edit: i cant get it to show my results. so ill try again tomorrow. -
Okay. 10char
-
My OC results without overvolting (760/1800):
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2920XM Processor,CLEVO P150HMx score: P4125 3DMarks
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2920XM Processor,CLEVO P150HMx score: P17385 3DMarks
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2920XM Processor,CLEVO P150HMx score: 22251 3DMarks -
Nice, I was looking for something like that. Now to only hope I get my P170HM soon.
I wanted the 580m results to show someone something. -
Guys i have questions regarding drivers for my 580 M
U see recently Nvidia released the 280.26 driver , but when i check nvidia forums i see nothing but complain and negative feedback bout their driver ...
So Right now i still useing 275.50 from Clevo , did anyone with 580M tries the 280.26 driver ? can please share your impression ?
Thanks in advance -
Ill post a regular run in a bit. im in my room using a vnc to control my computer from my phone, the computer is across the house.
Edit: ok I'm running the bench with stock clocks right now. Also noticed on idle with fn+1 the gpu idles at 30C in a 28C room ftw! -
@aduy
Are you using 280.26 ?
Did you notice spike in voltage when you watching video in youtube ?
many user in nvidia forums report that their GPU jump to maximum voltage and clock when streaming youtube lol -
hmm no i didn't notice that but then again i wasn't monitoring my voltage while watch a youtube video. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2630QM Processor,CLEVO P150HMx score: P13420 3DMarks anywho heres my stock clock 3dmark vantage. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 485M video card benchmark result - Intel Core i7-2630QM Processor,CLEVO P150HMx score: P16042 3DMarksand here is my overclocked one. tomorrow ill try to do a better overclock with more memory overclock.
-
and Vantage somehow looks blurier than when using beta 280.19 plus theres some micro stuttering going on in the New Cisco.
didnt see any issues with 280.19 so might roll back -
Does anyone know whether one of these cards would work in a Clevo w880cu? Anyone here happened to have tried it?
Any info people could provide would be great, I am thinking of upgrading from my stock 480m. -
when overvolted and overclocked to the max what do you get with crysis set to very high?
-
I got a new P170HM with a GTX 580m.
Idle at around 38°C - 39°C
F.E.A.R. 3 -- 1980x1080 everything on max settings
Load 75°C everything without Fn + 1
I just did the furmark 1.8.2 benchmark with 1920 x 1080 MSAA Samples 32x .
I got a Clevo P170HM with a 580m gtx.
After 28 min. my temperature hit a constant 96c-97c (FN + 1 enabled) is that still normal or should I worry?
I still use stock paste, would it make much of a difference if I used AS5 or ICD 7? -
Have not ran furmark yet. I have played a few different games and temps are between 88 - 94c (depending on game). So I guess we are in the same boat. I guess we shouldnt overclock(wasnt planning to do this anyway)
Also I am running 280.19 drivers, cause they seem to be 2c cooler for me then the 280.26.
I am changing the paste today to see if it will make any difference!
In the mean time, does anyone know if bmpm5 and me have a problem or not?
Other then that I am enjoying this notebook alot! -
All settings on Ultra, 1920x1080, V-Sync disabled.
DX 11 patch and High Res Texture Patch installed.
Dont know what the fps were, but for me it was playable.
Temps measured with HW-Monitor, 86°C FN+1 was not used
Seems alright.
might change the stock paste to ICD7 over the weekend (maybe a new paste job will get us some more °C) and will do a new test with furmark and Crysis 2
btw. I use the 280.26 drivers -
After I applied the new paste today my temp while playing the same game and even the same mission went down from 92c to 76c! I couldnt believe me eyes!
I even applied a bit to much to my liking but thought I just give it a shot and I am very happy with the result, I think the original paste wasn't done very well.
I used Arctic mx-3. (I wanted the mx-4 but they were sold out on that) I knew they didnt have any ICD7 so I orderd that on inet and will apply that when it arrives.
Gtx 580m
Discussion in 'Sager and Clevo' started by materax, Jun 8, 2011.