Most of my games support SLI. The ones that don't aren't as demanding and can be run with my current 980. So with that...it would be a much better choice for me to go 1070 SLI. Each 1070 will be faster than my 980. It will be about 25% slower than a single 1080 in non sli.
Also I benchmark, 1070 SLI > 1080 easily.
The only two games I'm interested in this year are Dragon Ball Xenoverse 2 and Battlefield 1. Maybe COD but we'll see about that. Xenoverse 2 will not support SLI but I can run Xenoverse 1 easily with a 980 @ 4K so I expect a 1070 to play 2 no problem. Battlefield 1 will most likely support SLI so I'm not worried there.
I love the 4K 100% Adobe RGB panel and will keep it. The GPU upgrade will also allow me to use G-SYNC on this panel since my current 980 is a non G-SYNC 980. I still deal with 120hz 1080p (My old Alienware 17 that my bother has) it's nice and all but I'm fine with my 4K display.
-
Mr. Fox likes this.
-
-
Edit: I have a difficult time showing respect when awesomeness is trickled out to a small group of customers purely as a publicity stunt. It is not an accurate representation of their product line and makes me not want to own anything they sell.Last edited: Aug 7, 2016 -
Unless of course we do what Khenglish did and buy 1070 SLI then swap out the core with 1080 LOL -
buy the 1080 desktop from micro center and return it after core swap saying "performance not as advertised" lol
full money back
as for what I'm going to buy next gen, probably just a refresh of the aw17, they're really cheap from dell outlet with all the coupons from twitter and whatnot -
-
-
Meaker@Sager Company Representative
Plus it would offset a card from its heatsink mounting unless you de-soldered its connector to do it.
-
You don't need to answer
-
If they would have gone with the PCB in the middle, none of this discussion would have been necessary. Everyone that wanted 1080 SLI would be able to have it. That would have been the customer-centric approach and would have eliminated the need for them to reinvent the wheel. Buying a couple of GPUs and an enhanced heat sink assembly we would have been good to go. But, we can forget about that now. You're either going to be happy to be a single GPU jocket indefinitely, madder than hell about getting screwed, or filthy rich and ready to drop another huge wad of cash on the 2.0 version of basically the same product.
And, this is a very bad trend no matter what angle you're coming from... we already had two oddball MXM form factors in Clevo machines and that was enough. Now we have a third oddball form factor (not pictured) in 1080, for a total of four PCB variations including standard MXM. Where does this stop and what kind of slippery slope does it lead us to? They've totally ruined the P870DM ownership experience with this fourth version that won't fit next to each other because they made a really horrible design decision. A decision that doesn't instill much confidence in the brand and will cause me (and hopefully many others) to pause and re-evaluate what their next step should be. Maybe a person that is not getting screwed because they did not already buy the obsolete version less than a year ago thinks this is not a big deal. Those people need to stop and ask themselves, " Will this pathetic situation be where I find myself this time next year?"
http://www.eurocom.com/ec/upgrades()ec
Last edited: Aug 7, 2016 -
-
You would still need to get a new heat sink because of the L being flipped. I'd be OK with buying new heat sinks.
-
-
PrimeTimeAction Notebook Evangelist
Initially P870DM was holding one desktop 980 or two 980M. so you could just swap those with their equivalent GPU now.
P870DM3 is new product which they never offered before. Now usefulness of this new product is a different issue altogether.
My two cents...Last edited: Aug 7, 2016 -
Last edited: Aug 7, 2016
-
Does anyone have a dropbox or google drive link to the manual? I must have really bad timing but all the ones I've tried don't work anymore.
-
They could have used the middle PCB and given existing P870DM-G owners a 1080 SLI upgrade path. Hopefully, they will still do that and haven't told us yet. If they don't, then they should be ashamed of themselves for screwing us by not using the design pictured in the middle. They should also be ashamed of themselves for having never released the Titan-slayer 980 SLI.Last edited: Aug 7, 2016Papusan likes this. -
Anyway the screw goes in here:
temp00876, hmscott, ajc9988 and 1 other person like this. -
But since the Heat Sink can be screw to the frame and the GPU gets screwed to the Heat Sink, we should be good.Papusan likes this. -
-
why -
https://sslcdn.techinferno.com/uploads/monthly_09_2015/post-1023-14495000819169.jpg -
how odd.. -
We have a similar situation on the zm, no top screw. Meanwhile, the 775dm heatsink has one and extra coverage...
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk -
In which way would a single 1080 would not fit? Length? Width? Cos it has enough width just to do one in the master slot but the length needs to be verified.
Sent from my SM-N910G using Tapatalk -
-
My gut feeling made me choose the GT72S with the 980 and now I feel like I made the right choice. The 870DM was alluring with its non BGA cpu but I got that on my business laptop so can't complain
Now let's see if we manage to fit an MSI 1070 in the P75XDM :3 ( @Prema looking at you ) cough -
Sent from my SM-N910G using Tapatalk -
-
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk -
-
New heatsink, probably. Also, it is still unknown whether it needs additional power to run it, which early dm and zm boards don't have the connector soldered to the mb. Other than those concerns, it should be fine, although it may be hot running overall. Time will tell!
Sent from my SM-G900P using TapatalkGeorgel likes this. -
@Prema
By any chance do you know if Clevo are extending that courtesy to supply heatsinks for purchase? -
can solder connection to mb? -
Edit. Clevo has perhaps studied Eurocom's Poll of the week earlier who was about upgradable GPU's?Last edited: Aug 7, 2016oveco, TBoneSan, steberg and 1 other person like this. -
Edit: To clarify, I'm talking "10-30% improvement over single GPU is considered normal with newer titles". I think OCing a single 1080 would actually give you a better benefit in many cases. Especially because we:
- Don't have an OC'd SLI bridge (LED bridge)
- Don't have a HB bridge
- Don't have any confirmation that the MXM slots are changed in some way to allow more GPU-GPU transfer of data (which would negate the need for a better bridge, and is NORMALLY tied to PCI/e connection speed, in which case we have 3.0 x8/x8 because no enthusiast CPUs)
- Don't have access to PCI/e 3.0 x16/x16 configsLast edited: Aug 7, 2016 -
-
-
Georgel likes this.
-
-
-
If y'all really wanna put some pressure on Clevo simply suggest people/yourselves from dishing out 4000-5000$ on their next flagship.
Show them that their enthusiast niche doesn't like being exploited, a company like clevo won't want to play it unsafe and potentially lose their already half bent towards MSI customers... Thats where they need to be hit to understand what their fanbase wants imo.TBoneSan likes this. -
-
They lose a few customers, you'll see that they'll release they're in no position to pull of stuff like this -
Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk -
-
electrosoft, steberg, TBoneSan and 3 others like this.
*** Official Clevo P870DM2/P870DM3 (Sager NP9873/NP9872) Owner's Lounge! - The Phoenix 2 is here! **
Discussion in 'Sager/Clevo Reviews & Owners' Lounges' started by Spartan@HIDevolution, Aug 3, 2016.