Yes, there is no reason for it to change
The physical slot is more than sufficient. Note that in the desktop space the change from PCIe 2 to PCIe 3 is not warranting a change of the physical slot......no reason for it too in the mobile space
-
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
-
thanks for the quick reply thats very awesome to hear considering all the sites that sell the x7200 say its user upgradeable
-
-
(Since that was the next gpu out after the 485M)
-
-
-
What are you trying to achieve? You want to *limit* a process to a particular virtualized CPU?
Since modern OSs (Win 7, Linux and OSX) are all preemptive, multitasking operating systems, processing time slices are assigned round-robin to open resources (including CPUs). By limiting the number of resources (assigning a number of CPUs to a process), you could end up slowing down the entire process. Especially if that process is multi-threaded.
But, if you must, try creating batch files to launch whatever process you want using the "/AFFINITY" parameter - See http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/wind...-assigned-to-a-specific-cpu-in-windows-vista/. Note, I think the article may be wrong in terms of "what" AFFINITY to use. It is a "hex numbered mask" where each bit represents a CPU:
0x1 (1) = CPU0
0x2 (2) = CPU1
0x4 (4)= CPU2
0x8 (8)= CPU3
0x10 (16)= CPU4
0x20 (32) = CPU5
0x40 (64) = CPU6
0x80 (128) = CPU7
0x100 (256) = CPU8
0x200 (512) = CPU9
0x400 (1024) = CPU10
0x800 (2048) = CPU11
So if you want to run on CPU 2, CPU 4, and CPU 10, Affinity would be 0x4 + 0x10 + 0x400 = "414" hexadecimal. -
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
Windows 7 was optimized with Intel to be Hyperthreading "aware" so as to make optimal use of the hyperthreaded cores. No user intervention should be needed unless you have a specialized specific app you are planning to run....
-
-
cookinwitdiesel Retired Bencher
Easiest way is to test it yourself. I have played with locking single threaded benches (Super Pi and single thread wPrime) and did not see a tangible difference between locked to one core or windows managed. But that was only one instance at a time, more thorough tests could definitely be done by some one more motivated than me
-
I don't know enough internals to know if L1 is always restored once a thread of execution is assigned to a CPU (for example, if a thread is executing, is lifted when its time slice is up, and then restored to the same CPU core, it wouldn't need to go from L1 -> L2 and L2 -> L1), but assuming the architecture does so, setting the process to a single core wouldn't gain anything.
As scook9 mentioned, you could try some N number of long running processes (one assigned to a single core, and the others assigned to different cores) and see if times differ than if they ran on all CPUs. -
Proccesslasso is what your looking for.... If you really want to get indepth with that.
-
-
Larry@LPC-Digital Company Representative
The new EC (firmware) in this release may lower your temps a few degrees like it did for wwoods...
_ -
-
but its not realy sager that did the changes tho is it its normaly a clevo bios that have bin rebranded and added some stuff for OC and XTU other wise they would have bin able to answer my question when i asked the techs at sager about the fing CPU prob like paying 1k for a cpu with unlocked multiplier and getting the same posibilitys as a fing non extreme cpu sorry for my irritation but its starting to realy eat at me
-
It's time to let Clevo know that we require a more serious attention to OC'ing potential of the flagship system. -
Hi Everyone!
I was thinking does your USB 3.0 ports working at USB3.0 Speed? I had updated my Drivers and it doesn't seems to reach superspeed for mine.
Any advice? -
-
http://forum.notebookreview.com/sager-clevo/416916-clevo-bios-thread-204.html#post8211027 -
Could be something that blocks the 28nm cards from booting up along with some tweaks.
-
Isn't the third fan blocked for better ventilation? However it feels much hotter compared to the other fan openings. Should I open it myself? If so, how?
-
Support.3@XOTIC PC Company Representative
-
-
yes, it increased "internal" air flow
it hav been well tested and decided to close :
3dmark06 loop, room temp 25c
row: open 285m / close 285m / close 480m -
And one more...
See third paragraph "In regards to the closed Vent..." - http://forum.notebookreview.com/sag...formation-thread-post8291837.html#post8291837 -
Do you guys actually see 50C+ on the HDDs?
-
-
-
-
-
It's a bit chilly today in the midwest (USA) - ambient is like 21.8C right now. I just noticed the temps went up a degree on one of the XTs to 39C. The other is holding at 35C. No cooler in play, just sitting on my desk.
TBH, I cannot remember which bay holds what drives, and cannot check anytime soon. I wonder if the elevated temp is the one under battery. I'll dig at this sometime in the next day or so. -
but that break the feeling, i like to put same things together
btw my x18m/x25m/x25e all no temp monitor too -
Guess I would just stick with 2.0 speed for now. -
-
Support.3@XOTIC PC Company Representative
-
-
-
Not saying its gonna happen, but I want to to run a feasibility spreadheet to see... -
I'd love to upgrade but the wife would kill me. She still thinks I spent under $2k for my 7280... if she only knew!
-
-
Something else to put on my dream list. -
Unlocked Sager v13 BIOS is ready.
-
-
Not sure what you mean by Engadget knowing nothing about who makes the P270WM. They're just reporting on a press release from Maingear. Perhaps after reading the rest of this post, it'll make more sense.
In regards to your Sager question, it would depend on your location. Note, someone please correct me if I'm incorrect, but this is my understanding -
We know Clevo is the actual manufacturer. However, they are located in Korea. So those lappies need to be dispersed throughout the world to reach customers, as Clevo is not an exporter. That means companies like Sager (North America and other regions) and Eurocom (I believe for Great Britain) are importers of Clevo products.
Sager (or any other importer for that matter) may sell barebones Clevos to other Builders - AVA Direct, RJTech, Mythlogic, and any other Builder I may have missed - which may also include Maingear. These Builders may rebrand a particular laptop to their own product line, and some may not. For example, I have an actual Clevo X7200 from AVA Direct, not an NP7280, Eurocom Panther, Maingear Titan, etc.
Sager ALSO holds some of their imported products back and brands them as Sager for resale. These are then sold by Sager itself as well as regional reseller partners such as XoticPC, PC Torque, LPC Digital, PowerNotebooks, Fortnax, and anyone else I may have missed.
So, that is why it may seem that Sager is more associated w/ Clevo than anyone else. They're the ones bringing the products into a particular region, and in my case, the United States. Does that make sense? -
-
-
-
Good luck getting ahead of any similarly configured machine from said rival.
Who designed?
And I'm sure there are others as well.
In the end, I'm sure the builders want to appear bigger than they are - as that they have manufacturing capability. Don't get me wrong they do offer other valuable services like stress testing, better components, etc. They do offer value to a Clevo based laptop.
Also note, this has gone on for quite some time. Alienware and Voodoo PC used to be in this camp as well - rebranding Clevos.
Guess I'm just used to it after all these years. -
*** Official Clevo x7200 and Sager NP7280 owners lounge ***
Discussion in 'Sager/Clevo Reviews & Owners' Lounges' started by italian.madness, May 26, 2010.